General Obstetrics and Gynecology ObstetricsComparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination☆,☆☆
Section snippets
Material and methods
The Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition (PIN) study was conducted at prenatal care clinics at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospitals and at Wake County Human Services and Wake Area Health Education Center. As described in detail elsewhere,7 we recruited women for a prospective cohort study with enrollment at 24 to 29 weeks of gestation. Given the clinic locations, most patients resided in Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Burlington, and surrounding smaller communities in central North
Results
Evaluation of digit preference for LMP dates (Fig 1) showed a notable tendency to recall the 15th of the month, followed by peaks for the 1st, 5th, and 20th days of the month.Accounting for months with fewer than 31 days, there were deficits in reports of the 27th to 31st of the month and for odd numbers adjacent to multiples of 5, such as the 9th,
Comment
These results add to the growing literature that indicates LMP alone is fallible as a method for dating conception on the basis of comparisons to ultrasound scanning.5, 9, 10 The errors in recall and reporting are apparent in the pattern of digit preference, larger standard deviation, and greater variability among term births. There appear to be two distinct problems with LMP-based estimates. First, there is a problem of inaccurate recall, reflected most explicitly in digit preference as found
Acknowledgements
We thank the project manager, Jude F. Williams, and the clinic site coordinators, Barbara Eucker and Anne Carter; the obstetrics clinics and staff for their cooperation (particularly Dr Thad McDonald, Dr Peter Morris, Ida Dawson, Dr Cathi Weatherly-Jones, Dr Juan Granados, and Sara Caviness); and the many obstetric care providers in these clinics who assisted in the conduct of the study.
References (15)
- et al.
The duration of pregnancy [letter]
Lancet
(1969) - et al.
Time of ovulation and prolonged pregnancy
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1972) - et al.
Prematurity, postdates, and growth retardation: the influence of the use of ultrasonography on reported gestational age
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1989) - et al.
How does early ultrasound scan estimation of gestational age lead to higher rates of preterm birth?
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2002) - et al.
Classical and “true” gestational postmaturity
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1976) - et al.
A comparison of the ability of a sonographically measured biparietal diameter and the last menstrual period to predict the spontaneous onset of labor
Obstet Gynecol
(1990) - et al.
Errors in gestational age: evidence of bleeding early in pregnancy
Am J Public Health
(1999)
Cited by (314)
Management of preterm labor: Clinical practice guideline and recommendation by the WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine and the PMF-Perinatal Medicine Foundation
2023, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyAccuracy of Serum Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin for Estimating Gestational Age in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: Population-Based Study
2023, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaAssessment of Fetal Well-Being
2023, Avery's Diseases of the Newborn
- ☆
Supported by grants No. HD28684 and DA09096 from the National Institutes of Health; cooperative agreements S455-16/17, S0807-18, and S1099-19/19 through the Association of Schools of Public Health/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U64/CCU412273 through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and funds from the Wake Area Health Education Center in Raleigh, NC.
- ☆☆
Reprint requests: David A. Savitz, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, CB #7435, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435. E-mail: [email protected]