Skip to main content
Log in

Community action against asthma

Examining the partnership process of a community-based participatory research project

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community Action Against Asthma (CAAA) is a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project that assesses the effects of outdoor and indoor air quality on exacerbation of asthma in children, and tests household- and neighborhood-level interventions to reduce exposure to environmental asthma triggers. Representatives of community-based organizations, academia, an integrated health system, and the local health department work in partnership on CAAA’s Steering Committee (SC) to design and implement the project.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a process evaluation of the CAAA community-academic partnership.

DESIGN: In-depth interviews containing open-ended questions were conducted with SC members. Analysis included established methods for qualitative data, including focused coding and constant comparison methods.

SETTING: Community setting in Detroit, Michigan.

PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three members of the CAAA SC.

MEASUREMENTS: Common themes identified by SC members relating to the partnership’s ability to achieve project goals and the successes and challenges facing the partnership itself.

MAIN RESULTS: Identified partnership accomplishments included: successful implementation of a complex project, identification of children with previously undiagnosed asthma, and diverse participation and community influence in SC decisions. Challenges included ensuring all partners’ influence in decision-making, the need to adjust to “a different way of doing things” in CBPR, constraints and costs of doing CBPR felt by all partners, ongoing need for communication and maintaining trust, and balancing the needs of science and the community through intervention.

CONCLUSIONS: CBPR can enhance and facilitate basic research, but care must be given to trust issues, governance issues, organizational culture, and costs of participation for all organizations involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green LW, Mercer SL. Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1926–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett K. Collaboration for Community Empowerment: Redefining the Role of Academic Institutions. Berkeley, Calif: Center for Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchanan DR. Building academic-community linkages for health promotion: a case study in Massachusetts. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10:262–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fals-Borda O, Rahman MA. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. New York, NY: Intermediate Technology Publishers/Apex; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whyte WF. Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Israel BA, Lichtenstein R, Lantz PM, et al. The Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center: development, implementation and evaluation. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001;7:1–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lantz P, Viruell-Fuentes E, Israel BA, Softley D, Guzman JR. Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit. J Urban Health. 2001;78:495–507.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Bureau of Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC; 1990.

  10. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 3rd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmerman MA, Israel BA, Freudenberg N, Becker MH, Janz N. Evaluating twelve AIDS prevention interventions: methodology. In: Freudenberg N, Zimmerman MA, eds. AIDS Prevention in the Community: Lessons from the First Decade. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1995:199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alter C, Hage J. Organizations Working Together. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Educ Res. 1993;8:315–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Florin P, Mitchell R, Stevenson J. Identifying technical needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. Health Educ Res. 1993;8:417–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Education for Health. 2001;14:182–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edith A. Parker DrPH.

Additional information

Ms. Brakefield-Caldwell is retired from the Detroit Health Department.

Community Action Against Asthma is a community-based participatory research project of the Michigan Center for the Environment and Children’s Health (MCECH) aimed at investigating the influence of environmental factors on childhood asthma. We acknowledge the contributions of all of the partners involved in this collaborative effort: University of Michigan Schools of Public Health and Medicine, the Detroit Health Department, the Michigan Department of Agriculture, Plant and Pest Management Division, and 9 community-based organizations in Detroit (Butzel Family Center, Community Health and Social Services Center (CHASS), Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice, Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation, Friends of Parkside, Kettering/Butzel Health Initiative, Latino Family Services, United Community Housing Coalition and Warren/Conner Development Coalition), and Henry Ford Health System. MCECH, established in 1998, is funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (grant number P01-ES09589). MCECH is affiliated with the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center (URC), a collaboration among partners from academia, the local health department, community-based organizations, and an integrated health system. The Detroit URC is funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Please refer to www.sph.umich.edu/urc for more information. We also thank Sue Andersen and Kathy Edgren for their assistance in preparation of this manuscript.

Funding for this project comes from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (grant number P01-ES09589).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, E.A., Israel, B.A., Williams, M. et al. Community action against asthma. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 558–567 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20322.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20322.x

Key Words

Navigation