Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is Small Beautiful?

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioral screening questionnaire that can be completed in 5 minutes by the parents or teachers of children aged 4 to 16; there is a self-report version for 11- to 16-year-olds. In this study, mothers completed the SDQ and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) on 132 children aged 4 through 7 and drawn from psychiatric and dental clinics. Scores from the SDQ and CBCL were highly correlated and equally able to discriminate psychiatric from dental cases. As judged against a semistructured interview, the SDQ was significantly better than the CBCL at detecting inattention and hyperactivity, and at least as good at detecting internalizing and externalizing problems. Mothers of low-risk children were twice as likely to prefer the SDQ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991c). Manual for the Youth Self-Report. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1989) EQS: Structural equations mannual. Los Angeles: BMPP Statistical Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, I., Lucas, C., & McGuire, R. (1992). Measurement of behaviour difficulties in children using standard scales administered to mothers by computer: Reliability and validity. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron, C., & Rutter, M. (1991). Comorbidity in child psychopathology: Concepts, issues and research strategies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1063–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, G, Everitt, B., & Pickles, A. (1993). Modelling covariances and latent variables using EQS. London, England: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elander, J., & Rutter, M. (1996). Use and development of the Rutter parents' and teachers' scales. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 6, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombonne, E. (1989). The Child Behavior Checklist and the Rutter Parental Questionnaire: A comparison between two screening instruments. Psychological Medicine, 19, 777–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (in press). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

  • Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., & Bailey V. (1998). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A pilot study of the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 7, 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology, 148, 839–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Tizard, J., & Whitmore, K. (1970). Education, health and behaviour. London, England: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedje, H., Broman, J.-E., Hetta, J. & von Knorring, A.-L. (in press). Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the “Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.” European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

  • Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1989). Health measurement scales. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E., Sandberg, S., Thorley, G., & Giles, S. (1991). The epidemiology of childhood hyperactivity. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E., Schacher, R., Thorley, G., & Wieselberg, M. (1986). Conduct disorder and hyperactivity: I. Separation of hyperactivity and antisocial conduct in British child psychiatric patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 760–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1994). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, R., Scott, S. Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is Small Beautiful?. J Abnorm Child Psychol 27, 17–24 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022658222914

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022658222914

Navigation