Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Height, weight, weight change, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the Netherlands Cohort Study

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The association between several anthropometric indices and breast cancer risk was evaluated within the Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer, which began in 1986 and is conducted among 62,573 women aged 55 to 69 years at baseline. After 4.3 years of follow-up, data on 626 women with incident breast cancer were available with complete information on height and weight at baseline. In multivariate case-cohort analyses, a significantly positive association between adult height and breast cancer was found (P trend < 0.001). Compared with women with height ≤ 155 cm, the rate ratios of breast cancer for women with heights up to 160, 165, 170, 175, and ≥ 175 cm were 1.22, 1.19, 1.44, 1.77, and 2.06, respectively. For weight at baseline, the significant positive association with breast cancer observed in age-adjusted analysis disappeared in multivariate analysis with adjustment for height and other confounders. For body mass index (BMI) (wt[kg]/ht[m]2) at baseline, no association was observed with breast cancer in multivariate analysis; compared with women with a BMI less than 23, the RR for women with a BMI of 30 or more was 0.98 with P trend=0.46. Weight and BMI at age 20 showed weak inverse associations with breast cancer risk. For gain in weight or BMI between age 20 and cohort baseline age, inconsistent increases in risk were found, with no significant trends. These data support a positive association between height and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women. Further study is needed to evaluate the role of early diet and breast cancer in this population, and its relationship to height.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Waard F, Baanders-Van Halewijn EA. A prospective study in general practice on breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women. Int J Cancer 1974; 14: 153–60.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hunter DJ, Willett WC. Diet, body size, and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 110–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ursin G, Longnecker MP, Haile RW, Greenland S. A meta-analysis of body mass index and risk of premenopausal breast cancer. Epidemiology 1995; 6: 137–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Törnberg SA, Holm LE, Carstensen JM. Breast cancer risk in relation to serum cholesterol, serum beta-lipoprotein, height, weight, and blood pressure. Acta Oncol 1988; 27: 31–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tretli S. Height and weight in relation to breast cancer morbidity and mortality. A prospective study of 570,000 women in Norway. Int J Cancer 1989; 44: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vatten LJ, Kvinnsland S. Body height and risk of breast cancer. A prospective study of 23,831 Norwegian women. Br J Cancer 1990; 61: 881–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vatten LJ, Kvinnsland S. Body mass index and risk of breast cancer: a prospective study of 23,826 Norwegian women. Int J Cancer 1990; 45: 440–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ballard-Barbash R, Schatzkin A, Taylor PR, Kahle LL. Association of change in body mass with breast cancer. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 2152–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ballard-Barbash R. Anthropometry and breast cancer. Body size-a moving target. Cancer 1994; 74: 1090–100.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes-Josiah D, Potter JD, Sellers TA, Himes JH. Early body size and subsequent weight gain as predictors of breast cancer incidence (Iowa, United States). Cancer Causes Control 1995; 6: 112–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van den Brandt PA, Goldbohm RA, van't Veer P, Volovics A, Hermus RJJ, Sturmans F. A large-scale prospective co-hort study on diet and cancer in The Netherlands. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 285–95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van den Brandt PA, Schouten LJ, Goldbohm RA, Dorant E, Hunen PMH. Development of a record linkage protocol for use in the Dutch cancer registry for epidemiological research. Int J Epidemiol 1990; 19: 553–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldbohm RA, Van den Brandt PA, Dorant E. Estimation of the coverage of Dutch municipalities by cancer registries and PALGA based on hospital discharge data. Tijdschr Soc Gezondheidsz 1994; 72: 80–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van den Brandt PA, van't Veer P, Goldbohm RA, et al. A prospective cohort study on dietary fat and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van den Brandt PA, Goldbohm RA, van't Veer P. Alcohol and breast cancer: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141: 907–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Self SG, Prentice RL. Asymptotic distribution theory and efficiency results for case-cohort studies. Ann Stat 1988; 16: 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baker RJ. Glim 3.77 Reference Manual. Oxford, UK: Numerical Algorithms Group, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aitkin M, Anderson D, Francis B, Hinde J. Statistical Mod-elling in GLIM. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Year-book of the Netherlands 1990. The Hague, Netherlands: SDU Publishers, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. London SJ, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Rosner B, Speizer FE. Prospective study of relative weight, height, and risk of breast cancer. JAMA 1989; 262: 2853–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Folsom AR, Kaye SA, Prineas RJ, Potter JD, Gapstur SM, Wallace RB. Increased incidence of carcinoma of the breast associated with abdominal adiposity in postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 131: 794–803.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Swanson CA, Jones DY, Schatzkin A, Brinton LA, Ziegler RG. Breast cancer risk assessed by anthropometry in the NHANES I epidemiological follow-up study. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 363–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Palmer JR, Rosenberg L, Harlap S, et al. Adult height and risk of breast cancer among US black women. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141: 845–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Willett WC. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York, NY (USA): Oxford University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  25. De Waard F, Trichopoulos D. A unifying concept of the aetiology of breast cancer. Int J Cancer 1988; 41: 666–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vatten LJ, Kvinnsland S. Prospective study of height, body mass index and risk of breast cancer. Acta Oncol 1992; 31: 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Van Noord PAH, Arias-Careaga S. The Dutch-Famine 1944–45: lasting effects on adult height. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141: S11.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stein Z, Susser M, Sanger G, Marolla F. Famine and Human Development. The Dutch Hungerwinter of 1944–45. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Albanes D. Total calories, body weight, and tumor inci-dence in mice. Cancer Res 1987; 47: 1987–92.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stoll BA. Does extra height justify a higher risk of breast cancer? Ann Oncol 1992; 3: 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dorgan JF, Reichman ME, Judd JT, et al. The relation of body size to plasma of estrogens and androgens in premenopausal women (Maryland, United States). Cancer Causes Control 1995; 6: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brinton LA, Swanson CA. Height and weight at various ages and risk of breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol 1992; 2: 597–609.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Den Tonkelaar I, Seidell JC, Collette HJA, De Waard F. A prospective study on obesity and subcutaneous fat pattern-ing in relation to breast cancer in postmenopausal women participating in the DOM-project. Br J Cancer 1994; 69: 352–7.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Den Tonkelaar I, Seidell JC, Collette HJA, De Waard F. A prospective study on obesity and subcutaneous fat pattern-ing in relation to breast cancer in postmenopausal women participating in the DOM-project. Cancer 1992; 69: 2663–7.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Le Marchand L, Kolonel LN, Earle ME, Mi MP. Body size at different periods of life and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128: 137–52.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Radimer K, Siskind V, Bain C, Schofield F. Relation between anthropometric indicators and risk of breast cancer among Australian women. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138: 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chy SY, Lee NC, Wingo PA, Senie RT, Greenberg RS, Peterson HB. The relationship between body mass and breast cancer among women enrolled in the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 1197–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Limburg Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Piet A. van den Brandt, Miranda J. M. Dirx, Cécile M. Ronckers, Peggy van den Hoogen & R. Alexandra Goldbohm

Authors
  1. Piet A. van den Brandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miranda J. M. Dirx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cécile M. Ronckers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peggy van den Hoogen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Alexandra Goldbohm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van den Brandt, P.A., Dirx, M.J.M., Ronckers, C.M. et al. Height, weight, weight change, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the Netherlands Cohort Study. Cancer Causes Control 8, 39–47 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018479020716

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018479020716

Search

Navigation