Skip to main content
Log in

Health outcomes by self-report: validity of the SF-36 among Australian hospital patients

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the performance of the SF-36 as a self-reported outcome measure in a diverse sample of Australian hospital in-patients. The data derive from the Care Continuum and Health Outcomes Project with a total of 2088 randomly selected patients, yielding a response rate of 80%. Distributions, completion rates and, in particular, correlates of measures were used to investigate the validity of the SF-36 according to clinical and psychometric criteria. Physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations- physical, general health and vitality scales better represented physical than mental health, with the relative strength decreasing in that order; while mental health, role limitations-emotional and social functioning scales better represented mental health, with the relative strength decreasing in order. A cultural dimension was a strong independent correlate of all scales. While the SF-36 performed satisfactorily, there were weaknesses: the social functioning scale was too narrow to cover social health, both role limitations scales had crude response categories and particular subgroups, the frail elderly and those with complex health conditions, required measures with finer gradings for scales such as physical functioning and bodily pain. Further testing is needed to develop self-reports for use in hospital outcomes measurement which is already proposed in Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Faden R, Leplege A. Assessing quality of life: moral implications for clinical practice. Med Care 1992; 30: MS166-MS175.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ware JE. Conceptualizing and measuring generic health outcomes. Cancer 1991; 67: 774-779.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Cleary PD et al. Failure of physicians to recognise functional disability in ambulatory patients. Ann of Intern Med 1991; 114: 451-454.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gotay CC, Korn EL, McCabe MS, Moore TD, Cheson BD. Quality-of-life assessment in cancer treatment protocols: research issues in protocol development. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84(8): 575-579.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ware JE. Measuring patients' views: the optimum outcome measure. BMJ 1993; 306: 1429-1430.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deyo RA, Patrick DL. Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigations, patient care, and policy research. Med Care 1989; 27(3): S254-S268.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Centre, Health Institute, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305: 160-164.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247-263.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu R, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32(1): 40-66.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCallum J. The SF-36 in an Australian sample: validating a new, generic health status measure. Austr J Public Health 1995; 19(2): 160-166.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCallum J. The SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: Australian validation. In: Health Outcomes & Quality of Life Measurement Conference Proceedings.Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1995: 75.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kurtin PS, Davies AR, Meyer KB, DEGiacomo JM, Kantz ME. Patient-based health status measures in outpatient dialysis: early experiences in developing an outcomes assessment program. Med Care 1992; 30(5): MS136-MS149.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alonso J, Prieto L, Ferrer M, Anto JM. Comparison of two generic health status measures: the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 387-388.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gliklich RE, Hilinski JM. Longitudinal sensitivity of generic and specific health measure in chronic sinusitis. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 27-32.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hollingworth W, Mackenzie R, Todd CJ, Dixon AK. Measuring changes in quality of life following magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: SF-36, EuroQol or Rosser index? Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 325-334.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stucki G, Liang MH, Phillips C, Katz JN. The Short Form-36 is preferable to the SIP as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8(3): 174-181.

    Google Scholar 

  18. VanderZee KI, Sanderman R, Heyink J. A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: the Nottingham Health Profile and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 165-174.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stevenson C. SF-36: Interim Norms for Australian Data. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shadbolt B. The care continuum and health outcomes project: a longitudinal study of ACT hospital inpatients. In: Health Outcomes & Quality of Life Measurement Conference Proceedings.Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1995: 107.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Osoba D, Zee B, Pater J, Warr D, Kaizer L, Latreille J. Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EROTC quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 353-364.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McCormick A, Rosenbaum M. Morbidity Statistics from General Practice 1981-82. Third National Study: Socioeconomic Analyses. London: HMSO, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mathers C. Health Differentials among Adult Australians Aged 25-64 Years, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gannon D, Gordon C, Egloff B, Shadbolt B. Health Related Quality of Life in the ACT: 1994-95.Canberra: ACT Department of Health and Community Care, Canberra, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shadbolt, B., McCallum, J. & Singh, M. Health outcomes by self-report: validity of the SF-36 among Australian hospital patients. Qual Life Res 6, 343–352 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018431326207

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018431326207

Navigation