Skip to main content
Log in

Self-Administered Questionnaires versus Face-to-Face Interviews in Assessing Sexual Behavior in Young Women

Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effects of mode of assessment, person, and situational variables on the accuracy of self-reports of sexual behavior remain uncertain. To evaluate these influences, 190 young women completed measures of erotophilia and social desirability and then monitored their health-related behaviors with a diary for 8 weeks. They returned on two occasions to complete either a face-to-face interview (FTFI) or a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) regarding their behavior over the same interval. To check the apparent accuracy of participants' retrospective self-reports, a difference score was calculated by subtracting responses obtained on the FTFI or SAQ from the diary card. Results indicated that both modes of assessment were reliable; reliability did not differ as a function of mode of assessment. However, SAQs elicited less discrepant responses for protected vaginal sex; SAQ and FTFI reports for unprotected sexual behaviors were equivalent. Situational and person variables did not predict accuracy scores, which were impaired at higher frequencies of behavior. Results suggest that both modes of assessment were reliable and SAQs may be more accurate for some sexual behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Boekeloo, B. O., Schiavo, L., Rabin, D. L., Conlon, R. T., Jordan, C. S., and Mundt, D. J. (1994). Self-reports of HIV risk factors by patients at a sexually transmitted disease clinic: Audio vs. written questionnaires. Am. J. Pub. Health 84: 754–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N., and Sudman, S. (1979). Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design. Washington, DC: Jossey Bass.

  • Carey, M. P., Braaten, L. S., Maisto, S. A., Gleason, J. R., Forsyth, A. D., Durant, L. E., and Jaworski, B. C. (2000). Using information, motivational enhancement, and skills training to reduce the risk of HIV infection for low-income urban women: A second randomized clinical trial. Health Psychol. 19: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, J. A. (1999). A framework of conceptualizing reporting bias and its antecedents in interviews assessing human sexuality. J. Sex Res. 36: 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, J. A., McDermott, L. J., and Pollack, L. M. (1986). Questionnaire response bias and face-to face interview sample bias in sexuality research. J. Sex Res. 22: 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1964). The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, R. (1987). Asking sensitive behavioral questions in telephone interviews. Int. Q. Comm. Hlth. Ed. 8: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L., Ryan, R., Roffman, R., and Kulich, M. (1995). How could I forget? Inaccurate memories of sexually intimate moments. J. Sex Res. 32: 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., White, L. A., and Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia–erotophilia as a dimension of personality. J. Sex Res. 25: 123–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., and Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, over dispersed poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychol. Bull. 118: 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalichman, S. C., Kelly, J. A., and Stevenson, L. Y. (1997). Priming effects of HIV risk assessments on related perceptions and behavior: An experimental field study. AIDS Behav. 1: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunneborg, C. E. (1985). Estimating the correlation coefficient: The bootstrap approach. Psychol. Bull. 98: 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFall, R. M. (1970). Effects of self-monitoring on normal smoking behavior. J. Consult. Clin. Psych. 35: 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaws, M., Oldenburg, B., Ross, M.W., and Cooper, D. A. (1990). Sexual behaviour in AIDS-related research: Reliability and validity of recall and diary measures. J. Sex Res. 27: 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. G., Turner, C. F., and Moses, L. E. (1990). Methodological issues in AIDS surveys. In Miller, H. G., Turner, C. F., and Moses, L. E. (eds.), AIDS: The Second Decade.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reading, A. E. (1983). A comparison of the accuracy and reactivity of methods of monitoring male sexual behavior. J. Behav. Assess. 5: 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strecher, V. J., Becker, M. H., Clark, N. M., and Prasada-Rao, P. (1989). Using patients' descriptions of alcohol consumption, diet, medication compliance, and cigarette smoking: The validity of self-reports in research and practice. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 4: 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., and Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Publ. Opin. Q. 60: 275–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, G. R., Redman, S., Gibberd, R.W., and Sanson-Fisher, R.W. (1991). The reliability and stability of a quantity-frequency method and a diary method of measuring alcohol consumption. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 27: 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinhardt, L. S., Carey, M. P., Maisto, S. A., Carey, K. B., Cohen, M. M., and Wickramasinghe, S. M. (1998). Reliability of the timeline followback sexual behavior interview. Ann. Behav. Med. 20: 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinhardt, L. S., Forsyth, A. D., Carey, M. P., Jaworski, B. A., and Durant, L. E. (1998). Reliability and validity of self-report measures of HIV-related sexual behavior: Progress since 1990 and recommendations for research and practice. Arch. Sex Behav. 27: 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durant, L.E., Carey, M.P. Self-Administered Questionnaires versus Face-to-Face Interviews in Assessing Sexual Behavior in Young Women. Arch Sex Behav 29, 309–322 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001930202526

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001930202526

Navigation