ReviewInterventions to increase influenza vaccination rates in children with high-risk conditions—A systematic review
Introduction
Influenza is a common cause of morbidity and mortality across the world. Severe morbidity and mortality are more common among elderly people and those with certain chronic diseases [1]. For example, in the United States, the average excess hospitalization associated with influenza in previously healthy children under 4 years of age was 100 per 100,000 and in the age group 5–15 years, 40 per 100,000. For children at particular risk of serious infection, these annual rates were about 5 times higher than in those that were previously healthy. The World Health Organization consequently recommends that influenza vaccination should be offered to all individuals over 6 months of age with chronic heart or lung disease (including asthma), metabolic or renal disease or immunodeficiency [1]. Similar recommendations have been adopted in the United States [2] and the large majority of European countries [3].
In the UK, the vaccine is offered without cost to at-risk groups [4]. Despite these recommendations, Influenza vaccination rates in children with High-Risk Conditions (HRCs) have traditionally been low. In England and Wales in 2003–04, uptake was only 8% overall in children aged 0–19 with HRCs [5]. A more recent study, utilizing data from the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) collected during the 2009/10 influenza season, found that uptake for the seasonal influenza vaccine was 26% for children with HRCs aged 6 months to 4 years, and 34.5% for those aged 5–19 years. Older age groups with HRCs had higher rates, from 37.1% in those aged 20–39 to 74.8% in the 65–79 age group [6].
Several studies examining how to improve influenza vaccination rates in susceptible groups have been published, including a systematic review on improving influenza vaccination rates in the elderly [7] and a systematic review on improving influenza vaccination rates through reminder/recall systems in children with one particular HRC (asthma), with data published up to 2009 [8]. However, no systematic review on improving influenza vaccination rates in children with high-risk conditions other than asthma (such as chronic airway disease, chronic kidney disease, heart disease, liver disease and immunosuppression, e.g. from malignancy or medication) has been identified.
The aim of this review was to identify, describe and compare studies that have examined interventions aimed at improving influenza vaccination in children with HRCs.
Section snippets
Method
Two databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched using the following combination of keywords – Influenza AND vaccination OR immunization OR children AND asthma OR malignancy OR high-risk AND reminder (asthma is the commonest chronic condition in children, and malignancy is a common indication for influenza vaccination). There were no time or language restrictions in the search. The search was last conducted on 18/03/2014.
Results
The 18 studies included one systematic review of a specific intervention in asthmatic children [8], seven Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), six before-and-after studies, one non-randomized controlled trial, one retrospective cohort study, one quasi-experimental post-test study, and one letter to editors. Most of the studies (nine) were carried out on children with asthma, four were on children with HRCs, one covered children with onco-haematological malignancies, one was on children with
Discussion
This review does not include a meta-analysis because the heterogeneity caused by the different study methods, study populations and intervention programmes made it impossible to meaningfully combine the data.
Most of the studies were undertaken in the United States, except two studies that were conducted in Italy. There were no reported studies from other parts of the world, including the UK, where the extensive primary care system managed by general practitioners and funded from general
Conclusion/implications for practice
We would suggest that the evidence found in this review supports the following conclusions:
There is good evidence that reminder letters can improve influenza immunization uptake in children with HRCs, although it would be helpful to test this in countries other than the United States.
There is a lack of evidence that multiple reminder letters are more effective than single letters.
There is weak evidence that telephone recall improves uptake and good evidence that a known clinician making the
Acknowledgement
Thanks to the Health Protection Agency/Public Health England for funding the research.Contributors: All authors participated in defining the research question and devising the protocol. NA led on the identification and analysis of papers and all authors contributed to their assessment and interpretation. NA prepared the first draft of the paper and all authors contributed to its revision and preparation of the final document. Conflict of interest statement: All authors have no conflict of
References (41)
- et al.
Factors associated with uptake of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccine among clinical risk groups in the UK: An analysis using the General Practice Research Database
Vaccine
(2012) - et al.
Combining evidence and diffusion of innovation theory to enhance influenza immunization
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf
(2006) - et al.
Seasonal influenza vaccination reminders for children with high-risk conditions: a registry-based randomized trial
Am J Prev Med
(2012) - et al.
Factors conditioning effectiveness of a reminder/recall system to improve influenza vaccination in asthmatic children
Vaccine
(2009) - et al.
Improving influenza vaccination rates for children through year-round scheduling
Ambul Pediatr
(2006) Influenza vaccines. WHO position paper. Weekly epidemiological record
(2005)- Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Who should get vaccinated against influenza. Available at:...
- Vaccine European New Integrated Collaboration Effort. Seasonal influenza vaccination in EU/EEA, influenza season...
- Public Health England. Immunisation against infectious disease. Available at:...
- et al.
Influenza vaccine uptake and distribution in England and Wales using data from the General Practice Research Database, 1989/90–2003/04
J Public Health (Oxf)
(2005)
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Using reminder/recall systems to improve influenza immunization rates in children with asthma
J Pediatr Health Care
Appendix: Jadad scale for reporting randomized controlled trials
Evidence-based obstetric anaesthesia
Improving influenza vaccination rates of high-risk inner-city children over 2 intervention years
Ann Fam Med
Improving influenza immunisation for high-risk children and adolescents
Qual Saf Health Care
Improving influenza vaccination rates in children with asthma: a test of a computerized reminder system and an analysis of factors predicting vaccination compliance
Pediatrics
Do computer-generated reminder letters improve the rate of influenza immunization in an urban pediatric clinic?
Am J Dis Child
Identification and recall of children with chronic medical conditions for influenza vaccination
Pediatrics
Influenza vaccine compliance among pediatric asthma patients: what is the better method of notification?
Pediatr Asthma Allergy Immunol
Cited by (32)
Influenza Vaccinations Among Privately and Publicly Insured Children With Asthma
2023, Academic PediatricsShort Message Service Reminders to Parents for Increasing Adolescent Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Rates in a Secondary School Vaccine Program: A Randomized Control Trial
2019, Journal of Adolescent HealthCitation Excerpt :The benefits of sending a reminder also appear to be restricted to individuals who had missed an earlier dose, as those students who were up-to-date with the vaccine (i.e., completed dose 2 before the third school visit) almost always completed the three-dose schedule even without the intervention. The findings of this randomized control trial are consistent with several published systematic reviews in this field, which have found that overall, interventions using reminder strategies positively impact vaccination rates [34–37] and with studies specifically investigating SMS reminders to increase adolescent HPV vaccination rates [17,18]. However, there are two important differences between these and the present trial.
Communication-based interventions for increasing influenza vaccination rates among Aboriginal children: A randomised controlled trial
2018, VaccineCitation Excerpt :This means that children may be at risk from other vaccine-preventable diseases such as influenza. Influenza is a common cause of morbidity and mortality around the world, particularly among vulnerable populations like the elderly and young children [5]. Additionally, “a substantial proportion of the Indigenous population [report] a current medical condition that increases their risk of severe influenza” [6].
Effects of Phone and Text Message Reminders on Completion of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Series
2017, Journal of Adolescent HealthCitation Excerpt :Just over half of parents chose a text reminder, and we found that text reminders resulted in an 18% increase in patients achieving full vaccination for HPV. Several studies and systematic reviews have found telephone reminders to be effective for increasing early childhood immunization rates [8,30,31], for influenza vaccine [32], and adult pneumococcal vaccine [33]. Yet our study found a nonsignificant 8% increase in patients being fully vaccinated for HPV vaccine after telephone reminders, perhaps because of sample size limitations.
Randomized controlled trial of text message reminders for increasing influenza vaccination
2017, Annals of Family MedicineCitation Excerpt :To limit the message length (ie, cost) we did not include educational content in the messages used in the current study. Considering that previous research has shown patient education activities to be associated with improved vaccine uptake, however, it is possible that our intervention would have been more successful had we incorporated some patient education.13,14 For example, patients with no history of influenza vaccination may have responded better if we had provided educational content on vaccination benefits.