Mobilizing collective identity to reduce HIV risk among sex workers in Sonagachi, India: The boundaries, consciousness, negotiation framework

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.045Get rights and content

Abstract

The significantly low rate of HIV infection and high rate of condom use among sex workers in Kolkata, India is partially attributable to a community-led structural intervention called the Sonagachi Project which mobilizes sex workers to engage in HIV education, formation of community-based organizations and advocacy around sex work issues. This research examines how Sonagachi Project participants mobilize collective identity and the manner in which collective identity influences condom use. Using purposive sampling methods, 46 Sonagachi Project participants were selected in 2005 for in-depth qualitative interviews. Taylor and Whittier's (Taylor, V & Whittier, N (1992). Collective identities in social movement communities: lesbian feminist mobilization. In A. Morris & C. Mueller (Eds.) Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press) model of identity-formation through boundaries, consciousness and negotiation was used to interpret results. Subjects mobilized collective identity by (1) building boundaries demarcating in-group sex workers from out-group members, (2) raising consciousness about sex work as legitimate labor and the transformative change that results from program participation, and (3) negotiating identity with out-group members. This research establishes a conceptual link between the boundaries, consciousness and negotiation framework of collective identity mobilization and condom use. Condom use among sex workers is motivated by each element of the boundaries, consciousness and negotiation model: condoms mark boundaries, enunciate the consciousness that sex with clients is legitimate labor, and help negotiate the identity of sex workers in interactions with clients.

Introduction

While HIV prevalence among sex workers in Indian cities like Bombay, Delhi and Chennai ranges from 50% to 90% (see Basu et al., 2004), seroprevalence among sex workers in Kolkata is 11% (UNAIDS, 2002). Reported condom use among sex workers in Kolkata rose from 3% in 1992 to 90% in 1999 (National AIDS Control Organization [NACO], 1999, National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), 2001). Scholars have argued that a peer-led intervention called the Sonagachi Project (SP) which utilizes sex workers engaging in HIV intervention efforts has played a significant role in changing attitudes among Sonagachi's sex workers (Gangopadhyay et al., 2005) and reducing their sexual risk behavior (Basu et al., 2004, Jana and Singh, 1995).

Although scholars have emphasized the role of collective identity (CI) in the success of peer-led interventions like SP (Campbell and MacPhail, 2002, Latkin and Knowlton, 2005), few studies have sought to describe it, or explicitly link it to behavior change. Understanding the role of CI in empowering Sonagachi sex workers can fill several gaps in our knowledge. A lack of conceptual understanding of how the programs of SP and other peer-led interventions work limits the scope of efforts to replicate them. A conceptual framework that describes CI and the way it influences condom use can serve as a useful guide for replication efforts, especially in sites where differences in culture and context do not allow an easy or direct translation of the original intervention programs.

As a peer-led intervention seeking to change structural factors affecting HIV risk such as access to healthcare, the legal environment of sex work and societal perception of sex workers, SP has been described as a community-level structural intervention (CLSI) (Blankenship, Friedman, Dworkin, & Mantell, 2006). Evaluations of CLSIs have usually focused on individual-level outcomes and have largely ignored evaluating changes in the structures that they target (Blankenship et al., 2006). A conceptual definition of sex workers' CI will facilitate efforts to measure and evaluate one of the key structural outcomes of a CLSI like SP that seeks to increase levels of community empowerment.

This research contributes to our understanding of the role of CI in HIV interventions by (1) describing how it is established by SP participants and (2) enunciating the conceptual link between CI and condom use.

SP began in 1992 as a peer-facilitated condom education program implemented by Durbar Mahila Samanwaya Committee (DMSC)1, a community organization run by sex workers. It now runs healthcare clinics providing services to 20,000 sex workers, a savings and banking co-operative that invests in community business enterprises, a dance–drama troupe that performs in public venues about sex worker issues, a support group for HIV positive sex workers, several schools for children of sex workers and a babu (long-term male clients) group that helps clients avoid being targeted by the police (Chakrabarty, 2004, Jana and Singh, 1995). Moreover, the intervention has been replicated in 49 sites all over West Bengal, India (Chakrabarty, 2004) and has been shown to increase condom use in replication sites (Basu et al., 2004).

Community empowerment has been described as the community gaining control of, and helping to solve, the problems confronting it (Rappaport, 1987). Portes (1998) identifies two broad domains of community resources that are targeted by community empowerment efforts: (1) the material resources and capital embedded in networks at the community level (see also Carpiano, 2006) and (2) the relational and social psychological resources available in social networks, community participation and social cohesion (see also Hawe and Shiell, 2000, Putnam, 1993). Scholars have identified these two resource domains as the two types of social capital that can potentially enrich a community (Bourdieu, 1986, Campbell and MacPhail, 2002, Carpiano, 2006). This paper focuses on community empowerment processes that target relational social capital. We argue that the relational, social-psychological and discursive processes that constitute this arm of empowerment can be described through the mobilization of CI. By studying the process of CI mobilization among sex workers in Sonagachi and linking it to condom use, we seek to construct a conceptual framework for a crucial aspect of community empowerment.

Section snippets

Theoretical framework

Given the established body of work on CI in social movement scholarship, we draw on the work of social movement theorists who argue that CI formation is a key aspect of community mobilization and collective action (Melucci, 1985, Snow and McAdam, 2000). Taylor and Whittier (1992) describe CI mobilization as (1) the formation of boundaries differentiating movement actors from outsiders, (2) the establishment of consciousness that infuses meaning into group identification, and (3) the negotiation

Sample

In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 46 participants of SP. Since we were interested in distilling the elements of CI fostered by SP participation, purposive sampling was utilized to select key informants from the membership roster of Durbar who had been long-standing SP participants. Participants included 36 female sex workers and 10 non-sex worker Durbar staff members. Of the sex workers, two worked in Sonagachi, but didn't live there, while the others lived and worked in

Results

The results indicate that the CI mobilized by SP participants can be described by a more detailed and enunciated form of the BCN framework, and that each process constituting the BCN model influences condom use.

Discussion

This is the first study to explore a theoretical framework that links CI mobilization to intervention outcomes. By applying Taylor and Whittier's (1992) framework to CI formation in Sonagachi, we construct a useful analytical lens that can be used to enunciate CI mobilization and explain how CI influences condom use. The BCN framework has implications for our theoretical understanding of community empowerment interventions, and for their future implementation.

Study limitations

There are several limitations to the research. Since Taylor and Whittier's (1992) framework was used as an organizing coding scheme, it is possible that it skewed the interpretation of the data. While an inductive method was subsequently utilized to identify patterns in the data and ultimately led to the expansion of the original BCN model, future research needs to test the robustness of the framework.

Given the small sample size, results cannot be generalized to a wider population. Rather, the

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Center for HIV Identification, Prevention and Treatment Services for funding this research, as well as Dr. Kim Blankenship, Dr. Jeannette Ickovics and the CIRA NIMH Fellows for providing valuable feedback. Above all, we would like to thank the incredible women and men of DMSC for participating in this research.

References (27)

  • S. Jana et al.

    Beyond medical model of STD intervention – lessons from Sonagachi

    Indian Journal of Public Health

    (1995)
  • C. Latkin et al.

    Micro-social structural approaches to HIV prevention: a social-ecological perspective

    AIDS Care

    (2005)
  • M. Macaluso et al.

    Partner type and condom use

    AIDS

    (2000)
  • Cited by (96)

    • Sex work-related stigma: Experiential, symbolic and structural forms in the health systems of Delhi, India

      2019, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      To our knowledge, no other studies have deployed a multilayered conceptualization of sex work-related stigma in India. Research on sex workers in India also largely focuses on HIV (Biradavolu et al., 2009; O'Neil et al., 2004; Sinha, 2014), and there is disproportionate focus on sex workers in Sonagachi, Kolkata (Cornish and Banerjee, 2013; Fehrenbacher et al., 2016; Ghose et al., 2015, 2008; Swendeman et al., 2009) with few published studies concerning sex workers in Delhi (exceptions include Nambiar, 2009; Nambiar and Rimal, 2012; Hui, 2017). There is a significant gap in the literature on sex work-related stigma in Delhi, as distinct from HIV-related stigma.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text