Elsevier

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volume 104, Issue 2, 30 September 2006, Pages 190-200
Remote Sensing of Environment

Linking satellite images and hand-held infrared thermography to observed neighborhood climate conditions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.12.019Get rights and content

Abstract

While satellite images effectively show surface urban heat islands in urbanized areas, linking surface temperatures to actual ambient temperatures remains a research challenge. Microclimates in urbanized settings can vary tremendously in very short distances, making adequate climate interpolations across a large metropolitan area difficult, at best. This study links the coarse scale of satellite (ASTER) images to the fine scale of hand-held thermography as part of an in-depth suburban neighborhood climate study to determine if ASTER imaging can be used to adequately estimate neighborhood climate conditions in an urbanized area. The study utilizes day and night remotely-sensed and ground data from June, 2004 for Phoenix, Arizona. Microclimate conditions of three urban fringe neighborhoods with varying amounts of natural vegetation and development density were studied, along with ASTER remote sensing data, mobile climate transects, and spot infrared thermographic images.

These neighborhoods, though variable, showed only minor differences, and the study indicates that daytime images (11:20 am) do not adequately rank observed conditions within these neighborhoods — the highest ASTER surface temperatures were recorded for the least-dense neighborhood with a natural desert landscaping, though lowest ambient temperatures were measured there. Daytime mean surface temperatures versus air temperatures were 50.4 °C (30.8 °C air temp); 53.5 °C (29.7 °C); and 50.6 °C (31.9 °C). It was found that nighttime (10:40 pm LST) differences among neighborhoods of surface and air temperatures were relatively consistent, with the most densely developed neighborhood having the highest ASTER surface temperatures (29.0 °C) and transect-derived air temperatures (30.0 °C). Issues of view angle, shadowing, emissivity, resolution, and wind conditions for daytime results with their relatively small mean differences observed across the neighborhoods may explain why the rank of ASTER thermal conditions versus observed ambient conditions was poor. However, following sunset, these issues of view angle, etc., are much less problematic.

Introduction

Research on urban heat islands (e.g., Bonan, 2000, Oke, 1973, Svensson, 2004) suggests even settlements with a small population can have a substantial heat island impact. The metropolitan area of Phoenix, Arizona, USA with a population of over 3 million, has a well studied urban heat island (UHI), characterized by higher urban vs. rural temperatures, and a historical trend of significantly increasing temperatures in the city over the past 50 years (e.g.: Baker et al., 2002, Brazel et al., 2000). Urbanization is rapidly expanding into the open desert and the resultant suburban residential land may be contributing a positive feedback to the spread of the urban heat island. The heterogeneity found within the urban fabric in metropolitan Phoenix creates a complexity of microclimates with significant local variability within the metropolitan area, which is difficult to assess adequately.

Remote sensing is a key to mesoscale modeling through specification of land cover distributions and creating spatial products of moisture, reflectance, and surface temperatures (Zehnder, 2002). Understanding the relationship between the “coarse” scale satellite remotely-sensed data, to “fine” scale hand-held thermography, and then to the observed ambient temperatures at the neighborhood microclimate scale, could allow further extrapolation to estimate the impact of urbanization across the metropolitan area for input into mesoscale models, and enhance prediction of UHI expansion through assessing the microclimate impact of growth and neighborhood design.

While there have been many studies that have highlighted temperature variation in urban areas through the use of high resolution remote sensing imagery (e.g., Eliasson, 1992, Quattrochi and Ridd, 1998), our study also adds the technique of ground thermography surveys and in situ surface climate observations to describe the residential environments. This method quantifies the thermal variation based on urban land use type, using the techniques of thermography, processing of remote sensing data, and utilization of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). These techniques can be easily applied to other arid cities and utilized by non-modeling researchers to describe the thermal environment of residential neighborhoods on the periphery of the city, and generate results that can be provided to urban planners and policy makers.

Connections between urbanization and climate in the region have been studied previously (e.g. Lougeay et al., 1994), but it is not known to what extent new residential developments beyond the urban fringe have an impact on local climatic conditions. Previous mobile transect sampling through urban, residential, and rural areas has shown on clear, calm days, the existence of very large thermal gradients across the urban fringe zone into rural areas, but the details of rural thermal patterns, associated with new developments, has not been fully investigated (Brazel et al., 1999, Hawkins et al., 2004, Hedquist, 2002, Stabler et al., 2005). In order to generate accurate models of Phoenix's mesoclimate, the impacts of large acreage tract residential developments on the urban fringe should be understood.

Section snippets

Regional

Greater Phoenix (Fig. 1: 33° 26′N /112°W, elevation ca. 350 m) encompasses approximately 38,000 sq. km in a two county region of Maricopa and Pinal counties in central Arizona, USA. It is an arid, subtropical region that has experienced explosive growth during the past half century. Regional population increased from 1,600,000 in 1980 to 2,238,000 in 1990; reached 3,379,000 as of July 2001, gaining 101,400 people annually since 1990 (HUD, 2002) — the highest percentage change of urbanized

Research methodology

A combination of methods was utilized: ASTER images, walking transects, and a fixed station observational sampling network with hand-held thermographic images for ground measurements. Ground measurements/thermography were part of a larger microclimate study (Hartz, 2004). Thermography was taken on June 10, 2004 with the nearest available times of day and night ASTER image data being June 7th for 10:40 pm LST, nighttime — and June 17, 2004 at 11:20 am LST, for daytime. Since the ideal

Surface and air temperature comparisons

Table 3 summarizes near-ground level (ca. 1.5 m) ambient air temperatures and remotely-sensed ASTER surface temperatures, albedo and SAVI for both the transects (a portion of the study areas) and for each neighborhood's full study area. Also included are the extrapolated mean surface temperature for each neighborhood derived from the thermographically-sensed measurements of built and natural features. At each of the air–dew point sensor placements, sky horizon angles were measured to determine

Conclusions

This study shows that ASTER images could be successfully used to estimate relative neighborhood temperatures at an urban microscale level especially for the evening hours — the prime hours of largest air temperature UHI formation. The overall rankings (hottest to coolest) by remotely-sensed surface temperatures were very similar to those measured by both the hand-held thermography and the neighborhood microclimate study. The nighttime images also accurately reflected the heterogeneity of the

Acknowledgements

Our thanks to the members of the transdisciplinary UHI research program of the Global Institute of Sustainability at Arizona State University, which focuses on urban topics in the context of Sustainability: Buildings, surface materials and pavements, urban forestry, and climate and modeling at the micro and mesoscales (http://www.urbanheat.org and http://www.ASUsmart.org). We are particularly grateful for the assistance of Kamil Kaloush, Assistant Professor in the Civil and Environmental

References (36)

  • R.C. Balling et al.

    High-resolution nighttime temperature patterns in Phoenix

    Journal of the Arizona–Nevada Academy of Science

    (1989)
  • L. Barring et al.

    Canyon geometry, street temperatures and urban heat island in Malmo, Sweden

    Journal of Climatology

    (1985)
  • R. Bornstien

    Mean diurnal circulation and thermodynamic evolution of urban boundary layers

  • A.J. Brazel et al.

    Microclimate and housing waves along the urban fringe

  • A.J. Brazel et al.

    The tale of two climates — Baltimore and Phoenix urban LTER sites

    Climate Research

    (2000)
  • Y. Çengel

    Heat transfer. A practical approach

    (2003)
  • T.J. Chandler

    The climate of London

    (1965)
  • I. Eliasson

    Infrared thermography and urban temperature patterns

    International Journal of Remote Sensing

    (1992)
  • Cited by (81)

    • Infrared thermography in the built environment: A multi-scale review

      2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
    • Assessment of constructing canopy urban heat island temperatures from thermal images: An integrated multi-scale approach

      2020, Scientific African
      Citation Excerpt :

      It also operates in a reasonable imaging cycle of daily (AVHRR and MODIS) and 16-days (Landsat and ASTER) revisit. Some studies have been conducted to compare canopy and surface UHIs and evaluate the applications of TIRRS data in urban climatology [4,5,16,21,23,37], estimating air temperature [15,29,34,42,52,55], or even, unlike common, predicting LST from NSAT when direct observations from satellites are unavailable [20] and when soil temperature monitoring in weather stations is inadequate [54]. Wemegah et al. [47] compared the weather station-based temperature trends versus the surface UHI intensities that are derived from Landsat imageries in Greater Accra.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +1 602 771 8407.

    2

    Tel.: +1 480 965 7533.

    3

    Tel.: +1 480 965 4951; fax: +1 480 965 8087.

    View full text