Elsevier

Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Volume 46, Issue 4, January–February 2004, Pages 337-347
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Psychosocial factors in the development of coronary artery disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2003.09.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The fact that traditional risk factors only account for approximately two thirds of cases of coronary artery disease (CAD) has stimulated increasing interest in the relationship between CAD and psychosocial factors. Five areas—chronic stress, socioeconomic status (SES), personality, depression, and social support—have been most thoroughly examined. There is evidence to support a causal relationship between chronic stress, SES, depression, and social support and development of CAD. In this article, we discuss the epidemiologic evidence linking psychosocial factors and CAD, and review the effects of psychosocial factors on several pathophysiologic mechanisms that have been proposed as potential mediators of CAD. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, hypertension and cardiovascular reactivity, endothelial function, inflammatory markers, platelets, coagulation factors, fibrinogen, lipids, glucose metabolism, and lifestyle factors have all been implicated in this process. Recently, the first intervention trials have been carried out, although with initially disappointing results. Reducing the cardiovascular risk due to these psychosocial factors will be one of the major health care challenges in the future.

Section snippets

Work stress

It has been estimated that 10% to 40% of the workforce suffer from work stress, and at least one third of these have severe chronic psychosocial stress.2 Work stress tends to be greater in individuals of lower SES, and is also associated with lower social support, conventional cardiovascular risk factors, less education, and certain psychological traits. There are two main models of work stress. The Job Strain model (or demand-control model) centers on the concept that the highest job strain

Socioeconomic status

SES is an important and powerful determinant of CAD incidence and outcomes. The inverse gradient between CAD and SES as defined by occupational position, income, or education has been confirmed in a number of studies internationally,19, 20, 21, 22, 23with little evidence to the contrary. Some have argued that this association may be even stronger in women than men.24 Among men in the United Kingdom, 5000 additional deaths occur each year because of the social disparity in mortality rates.25 The

Depression and anxiety

Depression is a prospective risk factor for the development of CAD and it also influences prognosis after coronary events. Depression is 3 times more common among patients with CAD than controls31; one fifth of patients with CAD have depression32 and 15% to 20% of patients suffer major depression post-MI. This review is limited to the evidence and mechanisms for the involvement of depression in the development of CAD; discussion of the role of depression in patients with established cardiac

Personality, hostility, and anger

Despite early evidence that Type A behavior was an independent risk factor for CAD, subsequent literature has been rather negative and research to date has been inconclusive.4, 31 Attention has more recently been focused on hostility and anger as the potentially harmful aspects of Type A behavior.

Reanalyses of data from large Type A studies provided strong support for hostility being the toxic component.44, 45 However, the confounding effects of gender, ethnicity, social support, increased fat

Social support

In England, 16% of men and 11% of women report a severe lack of social support. Low social support causes greater psychological distress.58 People in unskilled manual jobs are more likely to have low social support than those in professional employment. Individuals with little social contact may have experienced psychologically upsetting events that separated them from friends and loved ones, leading to a diminution of social contact. The adverse effects of stressful life events can be

Mechanisms

Full consideration of the role of psychosocial factors in CAD not only involves scrutiny of the epidemiologic research, but also an understanding of the mechanisms through which social and psychological factors impact on coronary atherogenesis and the initiation of acute cardiac events. Several biological pathways relevant to the development of CAD are sensitive to psychological stress, and this provides a starting point for delineating the mediating mechanisms.

Summary and implications

There are now convincing data to support a link between SES, social support, depression, and work stress and CAD. There is growing evidence to support a link with anger. The wide variation in results relating to hostility prevents any concrete conclusions from being made at this time. It is often difficult to isolate the effects of independent psychosocial variables because they interact and tend to cluster together. For example, lower SES men and women who experience work stress are more

References (129)

  • W.J. Kop et al.

    Inflammation and coagulation factors in persons > 65 years of age with symptoms of depression but without evidence of myocardial ischemia

    Am J Cardiol

    (2002)
  • I. Kawachi et al.

    Decreased heart rate variability in men with phobic anxiety (data from the Normative Aging Study)

    Am J Cardiol

    (1995)
  • F.H. Gabbay et al.

    Triggers of myocardial ischemia during daily life in patients with coronary artery diseasephysical and mental activities, anger and smoking

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1996)
  • K.C. Light et al.

    Enhanced cardiovascular and catecholamine responses in women with depressive symptoms

    Int J Psychophysiol

    (1998)
  • S. Rajagopalan et al.

    Abnormal brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation in young adults with major depression

    Am J Cardiol

    (2001)
  • H.B. Skantze et al.

    Psychosocial stress causes endothelial injury in cynomolgus monkeys via beta1-adrenoceptor activation

    Atherosclerosis

    (1998)
  • L. Lind

    Circulating markers of inflammation and atherosclerosis

    Atherosclerosis

    (2003)
  • N. Owen et al.

    Socioeconomic status, C-reactive protein, immune factors, and responses to acute mental stress

    Brain Behav Immun

    (2003)
  • E.C. Suarez et al.

    The relation of aggression, hostility, and anger to lipopolysaccharide-stimulated tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha by blood monocytes from normal men

    Brain Behav Immun

    (2002)
  • D. Shimbo et al.

    Exaggerated serotonin-mediated platelet reactivity as a possible link in depression and acute coronary syndromes

    Am J Cardiol

    (2002)
  • A. Steptoe et al.

    The influence of psychological stress and socioeconomic status on platelet activation in men

    Atherosclerosis

    (2003)
  • A. Frimerman et al.

    Changes in hemostatic function at times of cyclic variation in occupational stress

    Am J Cardiol

    (1997)
  • E. Brunner et al.

    Childhood social circumstances and psychosocial and behavioural factors as determinants of plasma fibrinogen

    Lancet

    (1996)
  • R. Beaglehole et al.

    The search for new risk factors for coronary heart diseaseoccupational therapy for epidemiologists?

    Int J Epidemiol

    (2002)
  • R. Peter et al.

    Psychosocial work environment and the risk of coronary heart disease

    Int Arch Occup Environ Health

    (2000)
  • R. Karasek

    Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strainimplications for job design

    Admin Sci Q

    (1979)
  • H. Kuper et al.

    Systematic review of prospective cohort studies of psychosocial factors in the etiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease

    Semin Vasc Med

    (2002)
  • P.L. Schnall et al.

    Job strain and cardiovascular disease

    Annu Rev Public Health

    (1994)
  • R. Peter et al.

    Psychosocial work environment and myocardial infarctionimproving risk estimation by combining two complementary job stress models in the SHEEP Study

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (2002)
  • M. Kivimaki et al.

    Work stress and risk of cardiovascular mortalityprospective cohort study of industrial employees

    BMJ

    (2002)
  • H. Kuper et al.

    Job strain, job demands, decision latitude, and risk of coronary heart disease within the Whitehall II study

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (2003)
  • J. Siegrist

    Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions

    J Occup Health Psychol

    (1996)
  • M. Rosvall et al.

    Work-related psychosocial factors and carotid atherosclerosis

    Int J Epidemiol

    (2002)
  • J. Lynch et al.

    Workplace demands, economic reward, and progression of carotid atherosclerosis

    Circulation

    (1997)
  • M.A. Hlatky et al.

    Job strain and the prevalence and outcome of coronary artery disease

    Circulation

    (1995)
  • K. Orth-Gomer et al.

    Marital stress worsens prognosis in women with coronary heart diseasethe Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • K. Orth-Gomer et al.

    [Survey of stress in women. Heart disease in Stockholm women is caused by both family- and work-related stress]

    Lakartidningen

    (1997)
  • G. Rose et al.

    Social class and coronary heart disease

    Br Heart J

    (1981)
  • A. Rosengren et al.

    Socioeconomic differences in health indices, social networks and mortality among Swedish men. a study of men born in 1933

    Scand J Soc Med

    (1998)
  • G.D. Smith et al.

    Magnitude and causes of socioeconomic differentials in mortalityfurther evidence from the Whitehall Study

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (1990)
  • G.A. Kaplan et al.

    Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular diseasea review of the literature

    Circulation

    (1993)
  • Coronary Heart Disease Statistics

    (2002)
  • J. Hallqvist et al.

    Socioeconomic differences in risk of myocardial infarction 1971–1994 in Swedentime trends, relative risks and population attributable risks

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1998)
  • M. Marmot et al.

    Social class and coronary artery disease

  • J. Pekkanen et al.

    Social class, health behaviour, and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland

    BMJ

    (1995)
  • J.W. Lynch et al.

    Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the relation between socioeconomic status, risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and acute myocardial infarction?

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1996)
  • A. Rozanski et al.

    Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy

    Circulation

    (1999)
  • H. Hemingway et al.

    Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: systematic review of prospective cohort studies

    BMJ

    (1999)
  • L.R. Wulsin et al.

    Do depressive symptoms the onset of increase the risk for coronary disease? a systematic quantitative review

    Psychosom Med

    (2003)
  • R. Ross

    Atherosclerosisan inflammatory disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1999)
  • Cited by (266)

    • Psychosocial factors and subsequent risk of hospitalizations with peripheral artery disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

      2021, Atherosclerosis
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are plausible mechanisms by which psychosocial factors can increase the risk of CVD. For example, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation, inflammation, and increased platelet reactivity can increase CVD risk [7–9]. Behavioral mechanisms such as smoking, high-fat diet, poor adherence to medical treatment, and lack of physical exercise are likely to play a role as well [7–9].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the British Heart Foundation.

    View full text