Position papers of the Society for Adolescent Medicine
Bullying and peer victimization: Position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.09.004Get rights and content

Section snippets

Definition

The scientific literature on aggressive peer relations makes use of several different terms, including bullying, harassment and victimization. Although there may be subtle differences between these terms, they are all used to refer to behavior that is 1) aggressive or intended to harm; 2) carried out repeatedly and over time; and 3) occurs in an interpersonal relationship where a power imbalance exists [1]. A distinction is also made between direct and indirect behaviors. Direct bullying

Scope of the problem

It is estimated that up to three-quarters of young adolescents experience some types of bullying (such as rumors, name calling or public ridicule) and up to one-third report more extreme experiences of coercion or inappropriate touching [4]. In a large study of children in grades 6 through 10, 30% reported moderate or frequent involvement as a victim and/or perpetrator of bullying [5]. Direct bullying is more common among males, and indirect is more common among females [6]. Black youth report

Individual characteristics of victims

Youth who are victimized tend to be perceived as physically weaker and have fewer friends than those who are not victimized [8], [9], [10]. Gay, lesbian or bisexual adolescents are more likely to be victimized than their heterosexual peers [11], and overweight and obese adolescents suffer more harassment than normal weight teens, particularly among girls [12].

Consequences for victims

An Australian study found that victimization in middle adolescence predicted poorer physical health in later adolescence, controlling for baseline health status [13]. The psychosocial consequences of bullying are also significant: victims of bullying have reported increased rates of depression, suicidal ideation and loneliness [2], [5]. One study in particular showed that young people who had been bullied repeatedly throughout middle adolescence had lower self-esteem and higher depressive

Individual characteristics of perpetrators

Young people who engage in bullying behaviors tend to have higher levels of overall conduct problems [7], and are more likely to be involved in violence-related behaviors, such as weapon carrying and frequent fighting. These associations appear to persist into adulthood. For example, Olweus studied former bullies and found a 4-fold increase in criminal behavior at age 24 [17]. Sixty percent of the bullies had one conviction and 35 to 40% had 3 or more convictions.

It is important to note that

Environmental factors associated with bullying behavior

A variety of socio-environmental factors have been associated with the development of aggressive behavior in adolescence. General family characteristics, such as low involvement with parents, low parental warmth, low family cohesion and single-parent family structure have been found to be related to greater bullying among young people [8], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Childhood experiences more germane to aggression, such as spanking and other physical discipline, inconsistent punishment,

Interventions to reduce bullying behavior

Comprehensive school-based interventions aimed at reducing bullying behavior attempt to reduce opportunities and rewards for bullying by publicizing school-wide rules; training teachers to recognize and halt bullying; holding classroom discussions; implementing curricular activities; and meeting individually with bullies, victims and their parents. Evaluations of these programs have shown mixed results [33]. The Olweus Bullying Prevention Program, developed in Norway by one of the leading

Positions

The Society for Adolescent Medicine (SAM) supports the following positions:

  • Bullying among peers, although common, is not acceptable social behavior among youth. Adults and adolescents are encouraged to prevent bullying behavior and to change the perception that such behavior is normative.

  • Health care providers should be familiar with the characteristics of youth that may be involved in bullying, either as aggressors or victims. They need to be sensitive to signs and symptoms of bullying,

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (38)

  • D. Olweus et al.
  • M.F. Van der Wall et al.

    Psychosocial health among young victims and offenders of direct and indirect bullying

    Pediatrics

    (2003)
  • D.L. Espelage et al.

    Research on school bullying and victimizationWhat have we learned and where do we go from here?

    School Psychology Review

    (2003)
  • J. Juvonen et al.

    Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (2000)
  • T.R. Nansel et al.

    Bullying behavior among the U.S. youthPrevalence and association with psychological adjustment

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2001)
  • M.G. Borg

    The extent and nature of bullying among primary and secondary school children

    Education Research

    (1999)
  • J. Junger - Tas et al.

    Bullying and Delinquency in a Dutch School Population

    (1999)
  • D. Olweus

    Bullying at schoolWhat we know and what we can do

    (1993)
  • A.D. Pellegrini

    The rough play of adolescent boys of differing sociometric status

    International Journal of Behavioral Development

    (1994)
  • D.G. Perry et al.

    Victims of peer aggression

    Developmental Psychology

    (1988)
  • R. Garofalo et al.

    The association between health risk behaviors and sexual orientation among a school-based sample of adolescents

    Pediatrics

    (1998)
  • I. Janssen et al.

    Associations Between Overweight and Obesity With Bullying Behaviors in School-Aged Children

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • K. Rigby

    Peer victimization at school and the health of secondary school students

    British Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1999)
  • D. Olweus

    Victimization by peersAntecedents and long term outcomes

  • M.E. Eisenberg et al.

    Peer harassment, school connectedness and school success

    Journal of School Health

    (2003)
  • T.R. Nansel et al.

    Relationships between bullying and violence among US youth

    Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

    (2003)
  • D. Olweus

    Bullying among school childrenIntervention and prevention

  • S. Austin et al.

    Assessment of bully/victim problems in 8 to 11 year-olds

    British Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1996)
  • J. Juvonen et al.

    Bullying Among AdolescentsThe Strong, the Weak and the Troubled

    Pediatrics

    (2003)
  • Cited by (103)

    • Bullying: the role of the clinician in prevention and intervention

      2020, Clinician's Toolkit for Children's Behavioral Health
    • Childhood Bullying: Screening and Intervening Practices of Pediatric Primary Care Providers

      2019, Journal of Pediatric Health Care
      Citation Excerpt :

      Multiple national pediatric organizations include a policy or position statement on bullying, such as the National Association of School Nurses, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the World Health Organization, and the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. These statements, however, do not discuss specific screening methods to identify youth who have been involved with bullying (Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention, 2009; Eisenberg & Aalsma, 2005; National Association of School Nurses, 2018; World Health Organization, 2015). These generalized position statements also do not include recommendations for evidence-based interventions to treat youth after they have been involved with bullying.

    • Bullying: What the PNP Needs to Know

      2018, Journal of Pediatric Health Care
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text