Original article
Efficacy of folic acid supplementation in cardiovascular disease prevention: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2012.07.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

In observational studies, lower serum homocysteine levels are associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded mixed findings regarding the efficacy of therapeutic homocysteine in lowering cardiovascular risk. Our aim was to perform an updated meta-analysis of relevant RCTs to assess the efficacy of folic acid supplementation in the prevention of CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke.

Methods

We performed systematic search to identify RCTs reported at least one of the CVD, CHD, or stroke as outcomes. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval was used as a measure of the association between folic acid supplementation and risk of CVD, CHD, stroke, and all-cause mortality. The analysis was further stratified by factors that could affect the treatment effects.

Results

The systematic search identified 26 RCTs enrolling 58,804 participants. Pooling the RRs showed that folic acid supplementation was not associated with any significant change in the risk of CVD (RR 0.98, 0.95 to 1.02; p = 0.36), CHD (RR 1.03, 0.98 to 1.08; p = 0.23), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 0.96 to 1.04; p = 0.92), but was linked to a decreasing trend in stroke risk (RR 0.93, 0.86 to 1.00; p = 0.05). In stratified analyses, the only heterogeneity was found for stroke risk reduction among groups with (RR 1.07, 0.92 to 1.25) vs. without (RR 0.88, 0.81 to 0.96) mandatory grain fortification (P for heterogeneity = 0.03).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that there might be a potentially modest benefit of folic acid supplementation in stroke prevention.

Introduction

In 1969, homocysteine was first hypothesized to promote atherosclerosis based on the observation that children with extreme elevations of plasma homocysteine due to inborn errors of metabolism had premature atherothrombotic disease [1]. Subsequent experimental studies confirmed that homocysteine and its metabolites can cause oxidative stress, enhance inflammation and damage endothelium [2], [3]. Epidemiological studies repeatedly showed that elevated homocysteine is associated with coronary heart disease and stroke [4], [5]. A meta-analysis of prospective observational studies found that a 25% lower homocysteine level was associated with 11% lower coronary heart disease risk and 19% lower stroke risk [6].

Folate and vitamin B12 are important regulators of homocysteine metabolism. Increased folate intake reduces serum homocysteine levels [7]. This information suggested that folic acid might be a useful therapeutic intervention for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. This hypothesis was supported in young adults with extreme metabolic derangements of homocysteine metabolism. Among individuals with homocystinuria, treatment with high dose folic acid, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 lowered homocysteine levels and dramatically reduced cardiovascular risk and mortality [8].

These observations gave rise to the hope that lowering homocysteine levels in patients with high normal values could also confer therapeutic benefit in a much larger population. In some studies of biomarkers of cardiovascular disease, folic acid supplementation showed beneficial signals of activity, reducing carotid atherosclerosis progression and occurrence of abnormal exercise electrocardiography tests [9], [10].

Several randomized controlled trials of lowering homocysteine with folic acid to reduce clinical cardiovascular endpoints have been initiated since 1990s [11], [12], [13]. A meta-analysis which included trials up to June 2009 failed to demonstrate a benefit of homocysteine-lowering intervention with regard to cardiovascular disease or stroke [14]. However, that meta-analysis excluded end-stage renal disease trials and additional trials have been published in recent 3 years. We therefore undertook an updated meta-analysis.

Section snippets

Search strategy

The study was performed in accordance with the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration and Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis (QUOROM) consensus group [15], [16].

We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the clinical trial registry maintained at clinicaltrials.gov (1966 to May 2012) using the search strategy “homocysteine” or “folate” or “folic acid” or “vitamin B12” or “cobalamine” or “vitamin B6” or “pyridoxine” or “multivitamin” and

Results

Of the 29 reports retrieved for detailed assessment, one was excluded because it was derived from the same study as another report [22], two for receiving therapies in addition to folic acid and B vitamin in the active treatment group that control group did not receive (Fig. 1) [23], [24]. Our final analysis included 26 randomized controlled trials [10], [11], [12], [13], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]

Discussion

To date, 26 randomized controlled trials have reported on the effect of folic acid supplementation on risk of cardiovascular events. Our meta-analysis found a strong trend in the reduction of future stroke risk of 7% with folic acid supplementation, but there was no significant benefit or harm of folic acid supplementation on the risk of coronary heart disease all-cause mortality, or composite cardiovascular disease events among persons with a high risk of cardiovascular disease. As far as we

Learning points

  • Folic acid supplementation may reduce future stroke risk in people not residing in regions with mandatory grain fortification.

  • Folic acid supplementation is not associated with lower risk of future cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, or death.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Meng Lee was supported by a grant from CMRPG 660311, Taiwan and Jeffrey L Saver was supported by NIH SPOTRIAS Center and AHA PRT Health Outcomes Center Awards. We thank Kuo-Hsuan Chang, MD, for search of EMBASE and Yueh Lee, MSc, for retrieval of papers.

References (56)

  • M. Curro et al.

    Homocysteine-induced toxicity increases TG2 expression in Neuro2a cells

    Amino Acids

    (2009)
  • G.N. Welch et al.

    Homocysteine and atherothrombosis

    N Engl J Med

    (1998)
  • P.M. Ridker et al.

    Homocysteine and risk of cardiovascular disease among postmenopausal women

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • H. Iso et al.

    Serum total homocysteine concentrations and risk of stroke and its subtypes in Japanese

    Circulation

    (2004)
  • Homocysteine and risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke: a meta-analysis

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • D.E. Wilcken et al.

    The natural history of vascular disease in homocystinuria and the effects of treatment

    J Inherit Metab Dis

    (1997)
  • H.N. Hodis et al.

    High-dose B vitamin supplementation and progression of subclinical atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial

    Stroke

    (2009)
  • E. Lonn et al.

    Homocysteine lowering with folic acid and B vitamins in vascular disease

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • J.F. Toole et al.

    Lowering homocysteine in patients with ischemic stroke to prevent recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and death: the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2004)
  • CM et al.

    Effect of folic acid and B vitamins on risk of cardiovascular events and total mortality among women at high risk for cardiovascular disease: a randomized trial

    JAMA

    (2008)
  • A.J. Marti-Carvajal et al.

    Homocysteine lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2009)
  • J. Higgins et al.

    Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions

    (2008)
  • J.P. Higgins et al.

    Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

    Stat Med

    (2002)
  • J.P. Higgins et al.

    Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

    BMJ

    (2003)
  • S. Greenland et al.

    Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data

    Biometrics

    (1985)
  • N. Mantel et al.

    Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1959)
  • D.J. Rakhit et al.

    Effect of aggressive risk factor modification on cardiac events and myocardial ischaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease

    Heart

    (2006)
  • S.D. Mark et al.

    Lowered risks of hypertension and cerebrovascular disease after vitamin/mineral supplementation: the Linxian Nutrition Intervention Trial

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text