Elsevier

Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Volume 59, Issue 3, November–December 2014, Pages 542-548
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

The role of individual characteristics and physical frailty on health related quality of life (HRQOL): A cross sectional study of Italian community-dwelling older adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2014.08.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The study explores the relations among frailty, individual characteristics and HRQOL.

  • Gender and education are the individual characteristics more related with HRQOL.

  • The frailty component of poor endurance and energy has the largest effect on HRQOL.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between individual characteristics and HRQOL, and to identify which components of physical frailty measured according to Fried's criteria provided a better explanation of HRQOL. Two hundred and fifty-nine older adults (age 74 ± 6 years; 69% were women) living in Piemonte Region were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Socio-demographic and medical characteristics were captured by self-reported questionnaires. Physical frailty was assessed using the five criteria of Fried: shrinking, weakness, poor endurance and energy, slowness, and low physical activity level. HRQOL was measured with the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), using both the mental (MCS) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS). Among individual characteristics, gender was the best predictor for SF-36, the MCS, and the PCS, with values of R2 of 12.7%, 12.1%, and 8.8%, respectively. Among the five Fried's criteria, poor endurance and energy had the largest effect on HRQOL with values of ΔR2 of 13.9% for SF-36, 13.4% for the MCS, and 9.4% for the PCS. Results highlighted the role of the individual characteristics and the single weight of the five components of physical frailty on HRQOL. This knowledge may give new insights about the relations between individual functioning and self-rated health, allowing the development of individualized and more effective preventive interventions for a healthy aging.

Introduction

According to Eurostat data (Eurostat, 2012), Italy is one of the “oldest” countries in the world. In Italy, the life expectancy (LE) at birth is now 84 years for women and 79 for men, with a proportion of over 60 years of about 20% in 2011. Unfortunately, the prolonged LE is not accompanied by the increase of healthy life years, defined as disability-free LE, highlighting that we live an increasing number of years in a poor health condition.

Within the context of unhealthy extension of LE, it is necessary to find specific and strong indicators for predicting and preventing negative events of aging. The construct of frailty has been identify as a precursor state of adverse outcomes of aging (e.g., death, hospitalization, dependency in daily activities, institutionalization, falls, fractures, cognitive decline, dementia) (Castell et al., 2013, Chang et al., 2012, Chin et al., 1999, Clegg et al., 2013, Fried et al., 2001, Jones et al., 2004, Rockwood et al., 2005, Rockwood et al., 1999, Speechley and Tinetti, 1991, Winograd et al., 1991). Frailty is a fearsome condition for older adults, defined as a loss of physiologic reserve and an increased vulnerability to external stresses, deriving from multiple and interactive complex systems (Buchner and Wagner, 1992, Fried et al., 2001, Rockwood et al., 2000). Frailty is highly prevalent with increasing age (Collard et al., 2012, Shamliyan et al., 2013). According to the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (Santos-Eggimann, Cuenoud, Spagnoli, & Junod, 2009), 4% of seniors are frail in the age between 50 and 64 years, and 17% in the over 65 years.

Frailty in older adults is closely linked to HRQOL (Chang et al., 2012, Gobbens et al., 2012, Gobbens and van Assen, 2014, Kanwar et al., 2013, Masel et al., 2009). HRQOL refers to the physical, mental, and social domains of health, seen as distinct domains that can be influenced, in a complex way, by individual's experiences, beliefs, expectations, and perceptions (Testa & Simonson, 1996). HRQOL provides a patient point of view on effects of interventions, diseases, and processes acting on people. It is a person-centered outcome measure which is more informative than the traditional measures of mortality and morbidity (Idler and Benyamini, 1997, Tsai et al., 2007).

The role of socio-demographic characteristics and clinical conditions on HRQOL has been widely investigated in previous studies. A lower income and educational attainment seem to be associated with a reduced HRQOL, as well as the medical conditions could have a negative impact on HRQOL (Gobbens et al., 2012, Lubetkin et al., 2005, Zaninotto et al., 2009). Zaninotto et al. (2009) reported a significant association between increasing of age and poor HRQOL; unlike, Netuveli and Blane (2008), and Gobbens et al. (2012) did not find it. Wijnhoven, Kriegsman, Snoek, Hesselink, and de Haan (2003) found a worst HRQOL for women compared to men aged between 56 and 75 years and with asthma; whereas, Kirchengast and Haslinger (2008) found a higher level of HRQOL in women aged between 57 and 70 years compared to men of same age, while did not find significant gender differences in the older group (70 years and over). Several pathological conditions, especially chronic diseases, such as hypertension, osteoarthritis, diabetes, depression, asthma, have a negative effect on HRQOL (Brown et al., 2004, Gallegos-Carrillo et al., 2009, Gobbens and van Assen, 2014, Kempen et al., 1997, Lam and Lauder, 2000). Therefore, most of the studies on HRQOL (Hopman et al., 2009, Kempen et al., 1997, Kimura et al., 2010, Lam and Lauder, 2000) were conducted on subjects suffering from diseases with the aim to evaluate the impact of morbidity or the effectiveness of a treatment or intervention. Studies investigated the relation among individual factors and HRQOL reported controversial findings, as mentioned above. In order to clarify this issue, further studies are needed.

Within the literature of frailty, the association between frailty and HRQOL has been widely analysed. Several studies (Bilotta et al., 2010, Chang et al., 2012, Gobbens et al., 2012, Lin et al., 2011, Masel et al., 2009, Puts et al., 2007) found a significant association between frailty status and impairment in the HRQOL in community-dwelling older adults. Precisely, qualitative interviews conducted with 25 older adults in the Netherlands underlined a lower perception of QOL for frail with respect to robust subjects (Puts et al., 2007). Bilotta et al. (2010) reported that physical frailty status measured according to the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures criteria negatively affected five out of seven dimensions of quality of life (QOL) investigated using the Older People's QOL questionnaire in a sample of Italian older adults. Similarly, a better HRQOL for robust compared to frail and pre-frail subjects was found in Chinese (Chang et al., 2012), Mexican American (Masel et al., 2009), and Taiwanese older adults (Lin et al., 2011). In these studies, frailty and HRQOL were evaluated by using the Fried's criteria and the Short Form-36 questionnaire, respectively. Finally, Gobbens et al. (2012) found significant correlations between frailty and QOL, measured using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, in a Dutch sample of older adults.

Despite the large number of studies that have addressed the impact of frailty on HRQOL, we still know little about the weight of single components of frailty on HRQOL. Among the five frailty components of Fried et al. (2001), Lin et al. (2011) found that poor endurance and energy had a largest effect on both mental and physical QOL of older adults measured with SF-36, followed by slowness. Whereas, Chang et al. (2012) identified slowness as the major contributing component in the physical scale of SF-36, and poor endurance and energy in the mental scale of QOL. Using the Study of the Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) criteria for frailty evaluation, the study by Bilotta et al. (2010) reported “reduced energy level” as the first predictor of QOL. Thus, little is known on the impact of single components of frailty on mental and physical domains of HRQOL.

The current study pursued a twofold aim: (i) to investigate the relationship between individual characteristics (socio-demographic and medical aspects) and HRQOL; (ii) to identify which components of physical frailty measured according to Fried's criteria provided a better explanation of HRQOL.

Section snippets

Study participants and data collection

This research employed a data subset from the Italian Regional project Act on Aging, a longitudinal, intervention research to evaluate the effects of physical and cognitive training in women and men aged 65 years and over. Participants were recruited through the Health Office of Regione Piemonte, general medical practitioners, and local seniors associations. 900 subjects were assessed for eligibility, of which 298 did not meet study's inclusion criteria, 232 declined to participate, and 3 were

Main characteristics of the sample

Table 1 summarizes the main characteristics of participants. Of 259 subjects, the 69% (N = 178) were female and the 53% (N = 137) lived not alone. The mean age was 74 years (SD = 6; range 65–90). The age between women and men was not statistically different.

The 44% (N = 114) of participants had a level of education corresponding to primary school and the 63% (N = 163) had performed a manual job before the retirement (e.g., housewife, seamstress, workman, farmer, mason). A high number of participants (N = 

Discussion

In this cross-sectional study we achieved a twofold goal. Firstly, we investigated the role of socio-demographic (gender, age, living condition, education attainment, past job) and medical (use of drugs) aspects on HRQOL. Secondly, among the five frailty components of Fried, we identified the major associated factor for general, mental and physical dimensions of HRQOL.

As far as the first point is concerned, in agreement with previous studies (al-Windi et al., 1999, Lubetkin et al., 2005), we

Conclusions

In sum, our study highlighted the role of individual and medical characteristics as well as the single impact of the five frailty Fried's criteria on HRQOL. Our results improved the specific body of literature about mechanisms and relationships between functioning and self-rated health during the aging process. The discovery of relationship is strongly needed in order to identify risks and protective factors for a better aging and to develop new, individualized, and more effective preventive

Conflict of interest statement

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Acknowledgments

Research presented in this article has been supported by Regione Piemonte, Direzione e Innovazione Ricerca e Università, Bando Scienze Umane e Sociali 2008 (ID 59), for their contribution to ACT ON AGING study.

References (79)

  • T. Aghamolaei et al.

    Health related quality of life in elderly people living in Bandar Abbas, Iran: A population-based study

    Acta Medica Iranica

    (2010)
  • A. al-Windi et al.

    The influence of sociodemographic characteristics on well-being and symptoms in a Swedish community. Results from a postal questionnaire survey

    Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

    (1999)
  • S. Arber et al.

    Gender differences in informal caring

    Health & Social Care in the Community

    (1995)
  • J.A. Avila-Funes et al.

    Cognitive impairment improves the predictive validity of the phenotype of frailty for adverse health outcomes: The three-city study

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (2009)
  • J.P. Barile et al.

    Activities of daily living, chronic medical conditions, and health-related quality of life in older adults

    Journal of Ambulatory Care Management

    (2012)
  • K.M. Beusterien et al.

    Usefulness of the SF-36 Health Survey in measuring health outcomes in the depressed elderly

    Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology

    (1996)
  • C. Bilotta et al.

    Dimensions and correlates of quality of life according to frailty status: A cross-sectional study on community-dwelling older adults referred to an outpatient geriatric service in Italy

    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

    (2010)
  • E.F. Binder et al.

    Effects of exercise training on frailty in community-dwelling older adults: Results of a randomized, controlled trial

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (2002)
  • R.W. Bohannon

    Reference values for the timed up and go test: A descriptive meta-analysis

    Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy

    (2006)
  • D.M. Buchner et al.

    Preventing frail health

    Clinics in Geriatric Medicine

    (1992)
  • D. Buck et al.

    Cross-cultural differences in health-related quality of life of people with epilepsy: Findings from a European study

    Quality of Life Research

    (1999)
  • M.V. Castell et al.

    Frailty prevalence and slow walking speed in persons age 65 and older: Implications for primary care

    BMC Family Practice

    (2013)
  • Y.W. Chang et al.

    Frailty and its impact on health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study on elder community-dwelling preventive health service users

    PLOS ONE

    (2012)
  • H. Cheng et al.

    Self-reported lack of energy (anergia) among elders in a multiethnic community

    Journals of Gerontology: Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

    (2008)
  • A. Chin et al.

    How to select a frail elderly population? A comparison of three working definitions

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

    (1999)
  • A. Clegg et al.

    Frailty in elderly people

    Lancet

    (2013)
  • R.M. Collard et al.

    Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: A systematic review

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (2012)
  • Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct

    American Psychologist

    (2002)
  • Eurostat, European Commission

    Database: Population and social conditions

    (2012)
  • L.P. Fried et al.

    Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype

    Journals of Gerontology: Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

    (2001)
  • L. Gallicchio et al.

    The relationship between gender, social support, and health-related quality of life in a community-based study in Washington County, Maryland

    Quality of Life Research

    (2007)
  • M. Gine-Garriga et al.

    Physical exercise interventions for improving performance-based measures of physical function in community-dwelling, frail older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    (2013)
  • R.J. Gobbens et al.

    The prediction of quality of life by physical, psychological and social components of frailty in community-dwelling older people

    Quality of Life Research

    (2014)
  • R.J. Gobbens et al.

    Explaining quality of life of older people in the Netherlands using a multidimensional assessment of frailty

    Quality of Life Research

    (2012)
  • H.M. Gonzalez et al.

    Acculturation and the prevalence of depression in older Mexican Americans: Baseline results of the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (2001)
  • W.M. Hopman et al.

    Associations between chronic disease, age and physical and mental health status

    Chronic Diseases in Canada

    (2009)
  • H. Horder et al.

    Health-related quality of life in relation to walking habits and fitness: A population-based study of 75-year-olds

    Quality of Life Research

    (2013)
  • E.L. Idler et al.

    Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies

    Journal of Health and Social Behavior

    (1997)
  • 7250-2, International Standard ISO/TR (Producer)

    Basic human body measurements for technological design. Part 2. Statistical summaries of body measurements from individual ISO populations

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text