Major article
Risk factors for developing clinical infection with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in hospital patients initially only colonized with carbapenem-resistant K pneumoniae

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.05.022Get rights and content

Background

This study examined predictors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) colonization and risk factors for the development of CRKP infection in patients initially only colonized with CRKP.

Methods

A total of 464 patients with CRKP rectal colonization (CRKP-RC) were identified. Two case-control studies were performed, one comparing risk factors for CRKP-RC in patients who did not develop CRKP infection (CRKP-IN) versus patients without CRKP-RC and CRKP-IN, and the other comparing CRKP-RC patients who did not develop CRKP-IN with those who did.

Results

Forty-two of the 464 colonized patients developed CRKP-IN. Multivariate analysis identified the following predictors for CRKP-RC: antibiotic therapy (odds ratio [OR], 5.76; P ≤ .0001), aminopenicillin therapy (OR, 7.753; P = .004), bedridden (OR, 3.09; P = .021), and nursing home residency (OR, 3.09; P = .013). Risk factors for CRKP-IN in initially CRKP-RC–positive patients were previous invasive procedure (OR, 5.737; P = .021), diabetes mellitus (OR, 4.362; P = .017), solid tumor (OR, 3.422; P = .025), tracheostomy (OR, 4.978; P = .042), urinary catheter insertion (OR, 4.696; P = .037), and antipseudomonal penicillin (OR, 23.09; P ≤ .0001).

Conclusions

We suggest that in patients with CRKP-RC, a strategy for preventing CRKP-IN might include limiting antipseudomonal penicillin and carbapenem use and preventing infections by closely following compliance with infection control bundles.

Section snippets

Methods

Soroka University Medical Center is a 1,000-bed acute tertiary care university teaching hospital with more than 85,000 admission-years, serving a population of more than 500,000 people in southern Israel. To control the nosocomial dissemination of CRKP, since May 2007 our institution has performed active surveillance cultures (using rectal cultures) in patients admitted from other institutions and/or nursing homes, in selective high-risk wards such as intensive care units, and in patients who

Risk factor analysis: CRKP-RC group versus CRKP-IN group

A total of 464 patients with CRKP colonization (70% male) were identified between May 2007 and January 2010 and had records for review. Of these patients, 42 (9%) developed CRKP infection. The median age was 72.5 years (range, 21-95 years) in the CRKP-RC group and 72 years (range, 19-91 years) in the CRKP-IN group. The total CRKP-IN incidence density was 1.57 per 10,000 patient-days. The sources of infection were urinary tract infection (57.5%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (30%), and

Discussion

To examine the acquisition and dissemination of CRKP, we conducted 2 retrospective matched case-control studies. The first CRKP-RC versus control group study aimed to identify the risk factors for acquisition of CRKP colonization in our institution. Considering that CRKP-colonized patients were widely distributed all around the hospital and that a number of cases were also identified by active surveillance at the time of hospital admission (community-acquired), assessment of predictors for CRKP

References (28)

  • A. Borer et al.

    Attributable mortality rate for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2009)
  • Borer A, Eskira S, Nativ R, Saidel-Odes L, Riesenberg K, Schlaeffer F, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella...
  • Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 16th informational supplement. Document M100-S16

    (2006)
  • K.F. Anderson et al.

    Evaluation of methods to identify the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenase in Enterobactereaceae

    J Clin Microbiol

    (2007)
  • Cited by (181)

    • CRISPR/Cas13-assisted carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae detection

      2024, Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest: None to report.

    View full text