Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 32, Issue 12, November 1996, Pages 2108-2113
European Journal of Cancer

Original paper
Alcohol and breast cancer in the Swiss Canton of Vaud

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00229-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The relationship between alcoholic beverage drinking and the risk of breast cancer was considered using data from a case-control study of breast cancer conducted between 1990 and 1995 in the Swiss Canton of Vaud on 230 incident cases of breast cancer below age 75 years, linked with the Vaud Cancer Registry, and 507 controls admitted to the same network of hospitals for a wide spectrum of acute, non-neoplastic, non-hormone-related conditions. Overall, 70.4% of cases versus 57.4% of controls consumed alcohol, corresponding to a multivariate odds ratio (OR) of 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–2.2). The ORs were 1.3 for < 1 drink per day, 1.8 for 1 to 2, 1.5 for 2 to 4, and 2.7 for > 4 drinks per day, and the trend in risk with dose was significant. The association was consistent for wine (OR = 2.0), beer (OR = 2.6) and spirits (OR = 2.0), and was apparently stronger in premenopausal women, whereas no noticeable interaction was observed with any of the hormonal or reproductive risk factors for breast cancer. The alcohol-related risk was unrelated to duration; the OR was 1.8 for women who started drinking below the age of 30 years and 1.4 for those starting at the age of ⩾ 30 years. Thus, the present study confirms that alcohol is a correlate of breast cancer risk in this European population, where alcohol drinking among women is common and relatively high. Assuming that this association reflects causality, in terms of attributable risk, alcohol could explain 25% (8–42%) of breast cancer cases.

References (35)

  • S Franceschi et al.

    Alcohol and breast cancer in an area with high alcohol consumption

    Rev Epidém Santé Publ

    (1991)
  • M Ferraroni et al.

    Alcohol and breast cancer risk: a case-control study from Northern Italy

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1991)
  • S Richardson et al.

    Alcohol consumption in a case-control study of breast cancer in Southern France

    Int J Cancer

    (1989)
  • JM Martin-Moreno et al.

    Alcoholic beverage consumption and the risk of breast cancer in Spain

    Cancer Causes and Control

    (1993)
  • F Levi et al.

    Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 1983-87

    Soz Praeventivmed

    (1993)
  • F Levi et al.

    Dietary factors and breast cancer risk in Vaud, Switzerland

    Nutr Cancer

    (1993)
  • F Levi et al.

    Statistics from the Registry of the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, 1983–1987

  • Cited by (26)

    • Lifetime alcohol intake and breast cancer risk

      2006, Annals of Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The literature has been inconsistent for both of these factors as well with some studies reporting stronger associations in premenopausal women (7, 11, 13, 23, 54–56), some in postmenopausal women (5, 17, 32, 43, 49, 57, 58), and others reporting no differences (10, 47, 52, 53, 59). Several studies have reported a stronger effect among HRT users (33, 60), but more studies support no differences between HRT users and nonusers (11, 17, 23, 44, 47, 52, 53, 61, 62). There is also some evidence that the association may be modified by race (higher in whites in some (7, 32) but not all (23) studies), smoking (supported in one study] but not in others ]), and family history (some [31, 61–63], but not all [11, 17, 52, 53] studies).

    • Breast cancer and abortion: Collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83 000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries

      2004, The Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      Efforts were made to identify studies that recorded information on abortion, whether or not results had been published. 61 eligible studies were identified, 58 of which had published some findings,2–60 although not necessarily on abortion. Another four studies64–67 that had reported on breast cancer in relation to abortion were ineligible, because specific information on whether pregnancies ended as spontaneous or induced abortions had not been recorded systematically for women with breast cancer and a comparison group.

    • Dietary catechin delays tumor onset in a transgenic mouse model

      2002, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
    • Familial breast cancer: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease

      2001, Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      All data were checked centrally and apparent inconsistencies or implausibilities were corrected by correspondence with the appropriate investigator. The 52 studies included in these analyses4–53 (and two unpublished studies) are those that contributed information on breast cancer in mothers and sisters; 17 of them also contributed information on breast cancer in daughters.6,8,13,17,21,23,25,26,28,30–32,34,39,42,47,48 Data on breast cancer in mothers, sisters, and daughters were combined for most analyses, and ‘number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer’ refers to the total number reported to have had the disease at the time that enquiries were made.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text