Original article
Methodological approaches to shortening composite measurement scales

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00363-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Composite measurement scales (CMSs) have contributed to improving the measurement of complex medical phenomena such as physical and psychological functioning or health-related quality of life. However, their use in patient care and research is often limited by their length and excessive respondent burden. In such situations, short instruments should be made available. Efforts to develop short instruments have largely focused on shortening existing instruments. To investigate the methodology currently used in the shortening of CMS, we assessed 42 studies reported in medical, psychological, and educational journals between 1984 and 1994. A number of methodological and statistical considerations important in the CMS shortening procedure were found to have been ignored or neglected by authors developing short forms from existing CMS. Serious flaws appear mainly to result from inadequate conceptualization of the shortening process, and inappropriate use and excess credit given to statistical techniques used to select items to be retained in short forms. When performed, the assessment of measurement properties of the short form was often inappropriate, and cross validation studies were seldom conducted. We propose recommendations for shortening existing CMS, to help authors and investigators develop and choose, respectively, shortened measurement instruments. These recommendations address the preliminary choice of the original CMS to be shortened, and the two successive phases to be considered in the development of short forms: the shortening process itself, where items are selected, and the validation of the shortened CMS, which should be conducted independently using independent subject samples.

References (30)

  • B Kirshner et al.

    A methodological framework for assessing health indices

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1985)
  • GJ Boyle

    Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?

    Pers Individ Diff

    (1991)
  • AR Feinstein
  • JH Wasson et al.

    Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards

    N Engl J Med

    (1985)
  • DR Cox et al.

    Quality of life assessment: Can we keep it simple?

    J Royal Stat Soc

    (1992)
  • DL Streiner et al.

    Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to their Development and Use

    (1989)
  • J Coste et al.

    Methodological and statistical problems in the contruction of composite measurement scales. A survey of six medical and epidemiological journals

    Stat Med

    (1995)
  • A Tellegen et al.

    Old wine in new skins: grouping Wechsler subtests into new scales

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1967)
  • JC Nunnally
  • Checklist for statisticians

    Brit Med J

    (1993)
  • ME Charlson et al.

    Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods?

    Arch Int Med

    (1987)
  • SA Mulaik
  • RL Gorsuch
  • Cited by (193)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text