Commentary
Presumed innocent: Why we need systematic reviews of social policies

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00650-5Get rights and content

Section snippets

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Sally Macintyre, Hilary Thomson, and David Ogilvie for helpful comments on the paper. Funding: Mark Petticrew is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Department of Health, and receives funding as part of the ESRC EvidenceNetwork.

References (11)

  • D. Moher et al.

    Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trialsthe QUOROM statement

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • Anderson LM, Shinn C, Fullilove MT, et al. The effectiveness of early childhood development programs: a systematic...
  • Anderson LM, St. Charles J, Fullilove MT, et al. Providing affordable family housing and reducing residential...
  • Anderson ELM, Scrimshaw ESC, Fullilove EMT, Fielding EJE, Normand EJ, and the Task Force on Community Preventive...
  • E. Waters et al.

    Evidence-based public health practice; improving the quality and quantity of the evidence

    J Public Health Med

    (2002)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text