CommentaryPresumed innocent: Why we need systematic reviews of social policies
Section snippets
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Sally Macintyre, Hilary Thomson, and David Ogilvie for helpful comments on the paper. Funding: Mark Petticrew is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Department of Health, and receives funding as part of the ESRC EvidenceNetwork.
References (11)
- et al.
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trialsthe QUOROM statement
Lancet
(1999) - Anderson LM, Shinn C, Fullilove MT, et al. The effectiveness of early childhood development programs: a systematic...
- Anderson LM, St. Charles J, Fullilove MT, et al. Providing affordable family housing and reducing residential...
- Anderson ELM, Scrimshaw ESC, Fullilove EMT, Fielding EJE, Normand EJ, and the Task Force on Community Preventive...
- et al.
Evidence-based public health practice; improving the quality and quantity of the evidence
J Public Health Med
(2002)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (0)
Copyright © 2003 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.