Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 53, Issue 5, September 2001, Pages 553-567
Social Science & Medicine

Feminism meets the “new” epidemiologies: toward an appraisal of antifeminist biases in epidemiological research on women's health

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00360-9Get rights and content

Abstract

This essay explores an alternative paradigm for epidemiology, one which is explicitly informed by a feminist perspective. We intend to expand upon recent critiques and debates within the emergent fields of “critical”, “popular”, and “alternative” epidemiology to examine how epidemiology's conceptual models — which are meant to contribute to the prevention of social inequalities in health, but may instead reinforce social hierarchies based on gender, race, and class — constrain our understanding of health and disease. Specifically, we examine persistent antifeminist biases in contemporary epidemiological research on women's health. Issues highlighted include: problem definition and knowledge production in women's health; biological essentialization of women as reproducers; and decontextualization and depoliticization of women's health risks. As part of this critique, we include suggestions for an emancipatory epidemiology that incorporates an alternative feminist framework.

Section snippets

Introduction

If the biological finality of death can only be explained in wider social context then the complex realities of women's sickness and health must be explored in similar ways. In order to do this, traditional epidemiological methods have to be turned on their head. Instead of identifying diseases and then searching for the cause, we need to begin by identifying the major areas of activity that constitute women's lives. We can then go on to analyze the impact of these activities on their health and well being. Lesley Doyal (1995, p. 1)

Epidemiology is currently engaged in a moment of critical self-reflection, debating its models, theories, methods, levels of analysis, guiding principles, ethics, and future role in protecting the public's health.1

“New” epidemiologies and their articulation with feminism

In this essay, we hope to contribute to an alternative paradigm for epidemiology, one which is explicitly informed by a feminist perspective. To this end, our thinking clearly has been informed by three emerging forms of “new” epidemiology, including: (1) the critical epidemiology of Krieger & colleagues (Fee & Krieger, 1994; Krieger et al., 1993; Krieger & Fee, 1994; Krieger & Zierler (1995), Krieger & Zierler (1996)); (2) the popular epidemiology of Brown (Brown (1992), Brown (1997)); and (3)

Problem definition and knowledge production in women's health

In the new movement toward a more self-reflexive, critical epidemiology, debates often center on what epidemiologists should study — namely, what topics are worthy of epidemiological engagement and investment. Less often questions are asked about why and how epidemiologists produce knowledge, make knowledge claims, and articulate “difference” from the conjunction of knowledge/power. These epistemological (i.e., theories about the nature and scope of knowing, including presuppositions and

Creating a feminist epidemiology

Having spelled out a number of antifeminist biases in epidemiological studies of women's health, we conclude this essay with a hopeful exhortation to all epidemiologists: Namely, a call for the development of an emancipatory, feminist epidemiology that is perceptive of and responsive to the great diversity of women, their multiple forms of oppression, and the breadth of their health needs as they themselves define them. The theorizing of Euro-American women of color (a.k.a. black feminists) (

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Robert A. Hahn, of the Division of Prevention Research and Analytic Methods, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. He planted the seeds of this essay and provided rich critical insights on the nature of current epidemiological practice.

References (92)

  • M. Belenky et al.

    Women's ways of knowingThe development of self, voice, and mind

    (1986)
  • B. Berman et al.

    Women and smokingCurrent trends and issues of the 1990s

    Journal of Substance Abuse

    (1991)
  • J. Bertin

    Women's health and women's rightsReproductive health hazards in the workplace

  • S. Bordo

    Unbearable weightFeminism, western culture, and the body

    (1993)
  • P. Brown

    Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contaminationLay and professional ways of knowing

    Journal of Health and Social Behavior

    (1992)
  • P. Brown

    Popular epidemiology revisited

    Current Sociology

    (1997)
  • C. Browner et al.

    Women, work, and household health in the context of development

  • J. Butler

    Gender troubleFeminism and the subversion of identity

    (1990)
  • R. Casper et al.

    Weight and dieting concerns in adolescents. Fashion or symptom?

    Pediatrics

    (1990)
  • B. Charlton

    Epidemiology as a toolkit for clinical scientists

    Epidemiology

    (1997)
  • L. Clarke et al.

    Social organization and riskSome current controversies

    Annual Review of Sociology

    (1993)
  • S. Colen

    “Like a mother to them”Stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York

  • P. Collins

    Black feminist thoughtKnowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment

    (1991)
  • D. Davis

    The cultural construction of the premenstrual and menopausal symptoms

  • de Koning, K., & Martin M. (Eds.) (1996). Participatory research in health: Issues and experiences. New Jersey: Zed...
  • M. Dew et al.

    Effects of solvent exposure and occupational stress on the health of blue-collar women

  • A. Diez-Roux et al.

    Epidemiology, clinical science and beyond

    Epidemiology

    (1997)
  • M. Dougherty

    Southern midwifery and organized health careSystems in conflict

    Medical Anthropology

    (1982)
  • L. Doyal

    What makes women sickGender and the political economy of health

    (1995)
  • B. Ehrenreich et al.

    Witches, midwives and nursesA history of women healers

    (1973)
  • B. Ehrenreich et al.

    For her own good150 years of experts’ advice to women

    (1978)
  • P. Farmer

    AIDS and accusationHaiti and the geography of blame

    (1992)
  • Farmer, P., Connors, M., & Simmons, J. (Eds.) (1996). Women, poverty and aids: Sex, drugs and structural violence....
  • Fee, E., & Krieger, N., (Eds.) (1994). Women's health, power and politics: Essays on sex/gender, medicine and public...
  • M. Fine

    The politics of research and activism

  • K. Finkler

    Women in painGender and morbidity in Mexico

    (1994)
  • Fonow, M., & Cook, J. (Eds.) (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana...
  • G. Fraser

    Modern bodies, modern mindsMidwifery and reproductive change in an African American community

  • C. Freedman

    High tech and high heels in the global economyWomen, work, and pink-collar identities in the Caribbean

    (1999)
  • L. Freedman et al.

    Women's mortalityA legacy of neglect

  • I. Goldstein et al.

    The broad street pump

  • J. Hamilton

    Women and health policyOn the inclusion of females in clinical trials

  • B. Hooks

    Ain’t I a womanBlack women and feminism.

    (1981)
  • B. Hooks

    Feminist theory from margin to center

    (1983)
  • B. Hooks

    Teaching to transgressEducation as the practice of freedom

    (1994)
  • M.C. Inhorn et al.

    Infertility, infections, and iatrogenesis in EgyptThe anthropological epidemiology of blocked tubes

    Medical Anthropology

    (1993)
  • Cited by (93)

    • Cultural Epidemiology

      2016, International Encyclopedia of Public Health
    • Pragmatic prevention, permanent solution: Women's experiences with hysterectomy in rural India

      2016, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, women's own treatment-seeking narratives reflected complex negotiations between bodily suffering, socioeconomic structures and the “micro-physics” of power around them, rather than that of women submitting to unilateral medical authority (Lock and Kaufert, 1998). Recognising the structural constraints and the competing concerns that shape women's health status (Inhorn & Whittle, 2001), I argue that women exhibited “pragmatic agency” in the decision to remove the uterus as treatment for gynaecological ailments (Lock and Kaufert, 1998). Moreover, their decision-making processes highlight how bio-medical conditions both embody and reproduce social inequalities (Nguyen and Peschard, 2003).

    • "I felt for a long time like everything beautiful in me had been taken out": Women's suffering, remembering, and survival following the loss of child custody

      2015, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our analytic orientation is articulated by Smith (1987) as an approach that goes beyond words used in narratives to recover deeper meaning of societal forces shaping women's access to tools and language that can explain their experiences (Leonard & Ellen, 2008; Smith, 1987). In this interrelated approach to the personal and political, central to feminist health research, we are interested in denaturalizing processes by which power relations are linked to the impacts of child custody loss for women, and how these mediate ways of thinking, feeling, acting and being in the world (Inhorn & Whittle, 2001; Rogers, 2006). Our analysis offers a critical challenge to the dominant ‘individualist’ framing of mothers who lose custody of their children to CPS, portrayed often as careless and irresponsible.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text