ArticlesImpact of fly control on childhood diarrhoea in Pakistan: community-randomised trial
Introduction
Diarrhoeal diseases are a leading cause of childhood mortality, accounting for 3·3 million deaths worldwide each year.1 Preventive strategies are needed to reduce this mortality and the estimated annual morbidity of 1 billion diarrhoea episodes in children under 5 years of age.2 An effective prevention programme will integrate a selection of proven interventions aimed at specific pathogens (such as rotavirus immunisation) or transmission routes (improved water supply and sanitation). As a step towards defining which interventions should be recommended for inclusion in national programmes, WHO published a series of reviews on the effectiveness of various candidate interventions. Three categories of intervention were defined: ineffective or intervention of limited feasibility unlikely to have a major role in control programmes; intervention for which effectiveness or feasibility remains uncertain and in need of further research; highly effective intervention with strong evidence for its feasibility.3
The third “highly effective” category contained seven interventions that were considered promising for inclusion in diarrhoeal disease control programmes. These were promotion of breastfeeding, improvement of weaning practices, rotavirus immunisation, cholera immunisation (in special circumstances), measles immunisation, improvement of water supply and sanitation, and promotion of personal and domestic hygiene. Of the interventions reviewed, only two reduced diarrhoea incidence by more than 5% (median reduction of many studies) in children under 5 years old.
Fly control was placed in the first “ineffective” category, despite the fact that previous studies indicated a median reduction in diarrhoea incidence of 40%.4 Likely reasons for this decision are that many of the reviewed studies were poorly designed (with the exception of one study carried out in southern USA in the 1940s5) and that the sustainability of fly-control technology was unclear. If these were the reasons, fly control might, more appropriately, have been placed in the second “uncertain” category, pending further investigation.6 Subsequently, Cohen and colleagues found a reduction in diarrhoea incidence among Israeli soldiers after fly control with yeast-baited traps.7 Based on these promising results, and the fact that many previous intervention trials had been poorly designed, we undertook a controlled trial to investigate the impact of fly control on the incidence of childhood diarrhoea in a developing country where diarrhoea is a leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality.
Section snippets
Location and methods
The study area comprised six study villages and two control villages near the town of Peshawar in North West Frontier Province, Pakistan. Preliminary studies showed that a seasonal peak in diarrhoea incidence between March and June coincided with a peak in fly density.8 The villages consist of 20–40 compounds, each inhabited by two or three related families. Livestock are kept inside the compounds, giving rise to manure heaps throughout the villages, resulting in high fly-breeding potential.
Results
During the study period, 4160 fly catches were done in the eight monitored villages. The number of flies caught per paper per day ranged from 0 to 675; the data on fly density in the three groups of villages over the course of the study is shown in the figure. Data from the control group show three pronounced fly seasons in March to June each year. The fly season of 1996 was less pronounced than the others; this was probably due to climatic factors affecting fly breeding. During the 1995 fly
Discussion
This study suggests that fly control can significantly reduce childhood diarrhoea incidence during periods of high fly densities. This effect compares favourably with some of the WHO recommended diarrhoea interventions such as immunisation. One possible explanation for this finding is reporting bias. However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of cough or fever, two outcomes that are unlikely to be affected by the intervention.
The results of previous studies have tended to
References (16)
- et al.
Fly control in prevention of diarrhoeal disease
Lancet
(1994) - et al.
Reduction of transmission of shigellosis by control of houseflies (Musca domestica)
Lancet
(1991) - et al.
Scope for fly control as a diarrhoea intervention in Pakistan: a community perspective
Soc Sci Med
(1996) - et al.
The magnitude of the global problem of diarrhoeal disease: a ten year update
Bull World Health Organ
(1992) - et al.
Prevention of diarrhoea in young children in developing countries
Bull World Health Organ
(1997) Preventing diarrhoea: what are the policy options?
Health Pol Plan
(1986)Interventions for the control of diarrhoeal diseases among young children: fly control. WHO/CDD/91·37
(1991)- et al.
Diarrhoeal disease control studies: I—effect of fly control in a high morbidity area
Public Health Rep
(1948)
Cited by (117)
Development of QuEChERS method for simultaneous detection of cyromazine and melamine residues in eggs
2024, Journal of Food Composition and AnalysisEnvironmental assessment of on-site source-separated wastewater treatment and reuse systems for resource recovery in a sustainable sanitation view
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentThe dirty business of eliminating open defecation: The effect of village sanitation on child height from field experiments in four countries
2022, Journal of Development EconomicsCitation Excerpt :Open defecation (OD) is a major cause of the persistent worldwide burden of diarrhea and enteric parasite infection among children under 5 years old (Mara et al., 2010). OD can lead to the fecal contamination of water and food supplies and to the transmission of soil-borne helminths (Chavasse et al., 1999). Reducing OD requires access to and use of improved sanitation facilities, typically toilets of some form, defined as facilities that prevent human feces from re-entering the environment.2
Spatial dynamics of illegal dumpsites and prevalence of diarrhoeal diseases in Makokoba Township in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
2021, Scientific AfricanCitation Excerpt :A 90m buffer was mapped around the dumpsites. Studies suggest that the closer one is to the dumpsite (100 metres or less), the higher the risk as most vectors travel plus or minus 100 metres with the reported distances by different authors ranging from 90-150metres [2,24-27]. The Fishers Exact test was employed to determine whether there were relationships between socio-demographic characteristics and the prevalence of diarrhoeal diseases.
A Faecal Contamination Index for interpreting heterogeneous diarrhoea impacts of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions and overall, regional and country estimates of community sanitation coverage with a focus on low- and middle-income countries
2019, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental HealthThe public health benefits of urban sanitation in low and middle income countries
2018, Utilities Policy