Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 367, Issue 9524, 27 May–2 June 2006, Pages 1758-1766
The Lancet

Articles
Patterns, trends, and increasing disparities in mortality for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal infants born in Western Australia, 1980–2001: population database study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68771-0Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Since there are known disparities between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations in Australia, trends in infant mortality rates can be used to assess the effectiveness of programmes designed to improve the health of Aboriginal populations. We have examined mortality rates in these populations in Western Australia.

Methods

We used the most comprehensive and valid total population data available for an Australian state to determine all-cause and cause-specific mortality for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal infants born in Western Australia from 1980 to 2001.

Findings

Overall, infant mortality rates fell in both populations, but less so in Aboriginal (from 25·0 in 1980–84 to 16·1 in 1998–2001) than in non-Aboriginal infants (from 8·4 in 1980–84 to 3·7 in 1998–2001) such that disparities between the two groups increased for all major causes of infant death. The relative risk for Aboriginal compared with non-Aboriginal infants rose from 3·0 (95% CI 2·5–3·6) to 4·4 (3·5–5·5), and there were significantly more potentially preventable deaths, such as those caused by infections (5·9 per 1000 livebirths vs 0·7 per 1000 livebirths, RR 8·5, 95% CI 7·1–10·2). Additionally, for Aboriginal infants, postneonatal mortality rates were higher than neonatal mortality rates (11·2 per 1000 livebirths vs 9·7 per 1000 livebirths), trend analyses showed that previous reductions in deaths due to preterm birth (4·3 per 1000 livebirths—1·4 per 1000 livebirths from 1980–97) were not sustained in the most recent years studied (3·5 per 1000 livebirths), and rates of sudden infant death syndrome did not fall significantly (4·9 per 1000 livebirths vs 4·7 per 1000 livebirths).

Interpretation

These increasing disparities between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal infants, especially in remote areas, demand immediate action in partnership with Aboriginal communities, focusing on both access to primary health care and better living conditions. Implementation and assessment of policies to reduce the continuing social and economic disadvantage faced by Aboriginal families are vital.

Introduction

A child's risk of death is greatest around time of birth and in the first year of life. For the past 100 years or so, children who survived the first year had a good chance of living to adulthood. Since the most powerful determinants of infant mortality are social and economic, death in infancy is a good indicator of the social progress of a society, country, or group of people. Many of the causes of infant death, such as infections, are potentially preventable; others, such as low birthweight or preterm birth can be treated with good health care and services. Although we do not know the cause or causes of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), the frequency of this diagnosis fell substantially in non-Aboriginal infants after risk-intervention campaigns.1 Thus infant mortality is also an important measure of the effectiveness and availability of health services for mothers and children. As a result, any disparities in infant mortality, as are seen between rich and poor countries or between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children in Australia, are indications of inequalities in social and economic status and in the availability of health care.2

Not only birthweight but also the pattern of infant mortality differs between rich and poor populations. Those who are advantaged and have good services have higher neonatal than postneonatal mortality rates. The main causes of neonatal deaths are birth defects and preterm birth, which are not very amenable to either prevention or treatment. Postneonatal deaths are now mostly preventable—eg, infections and SIDS.

The excess burden of premature deaths in Aboriginal Australians and the disparity in the rates of infant and childhood deaths between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians are well known.3, 4, 5 A comprehensive and accurate profile of mortality is vital to enable effective prevention strategies, including appropriate health and other government policies to redress this disparity.

Despite a large amount of data describing the poor health status of Aboriginal people in Australia, few states have comprehensive death data for more than a few years, including those where most Aboriginal people live.6 Thus in 2003, when the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia developed a plan for Aboriginal health research, a main recommendation was to obtain more data for deaths and for neglected groups such as urban Aboriginal and young people.7

Epidemiological data are essential to contribute to the prevention of infant and child deaths and should not only include mortality trends over time but also measure potential risk factors; these include maternal and infant factors, specific causes of death, where families live, and where the infants die (as measures of access to health-care services). Complete death information is available in the unique total population linked data in Western Australia for all births since 1980. We have comprehensively reviewed all deaths to provide a complete and accurate epidemiological description of trends and potential risk factors.

Section snippets

Population data

The main source of data was the linked, total population Western Australian Maternal And Child Health Research Database (MCHRDB).8 The study population consisted of all livebirths in Western Australia from 1980 to 2001 inclusive that were linked to infant deaths. These data are more than 99% complete for both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal infants.9 Descriptive data for causes of death from the office of the Registrar General of Western Australia and autopsy reports held at the forensic

Results

We assessed total-population mortality data for 534 922 births in Western Australia between 1980 and 2001, in this birth cohort there were 3713 deaths. Births to Aboriginal mothers accounted for 6% of all births in Western Australia, but for 17% of the deaths (table 1). The IMR for Aboriginal infants was over three times that for non-Aboriginal infants. By contrast with non-Aboriginal infants, the rate of postneonatal death in Aboriginal infants was higher than that of neonatal deaths, but in

Discussion

This research has extended the previous reports of infant mortality in Western Australia and described all-cause and cause-specific mortality to the end of 2002. We have shown that the main causes of infant death in Western Australia are SIDS and infection in Aboriginal infants and birth defects and prematurity in non-Aboriginal infants.5 Notably, the only significantly reduced rates in Aboriginal infants were overall neonatal deaths and those due to sequelae of prematurity up to birth years

References (34)

  • The health and welfare of Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People

    (2005)
  • The NHMRC road map: a strategic framework for improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health through research

    (2003)
  • V Gee et al.

    Validation study of the Western Australian midwives' notification system 1992

    (1994)
  • C Bower et al.

    Ascertainment of birth defects: the effect on completeness of adding a new source of data

    J Paediatr Child Health

    (2000)
  • Freemantle CJ, Read AW, de Klerk NH, McAullay D, Stanley FJ. Sudden infant death syndrome: Aboriginal and...
  • V Gee et al.

    Perinatal statistics in Western Australia: fourteenth annual report of the Western Australia midwives' notification system

    (1998)
  • AW Read

    Comparison of Indigenous status at birth with that at hospital admission using the maternal and child health research database

    (1999)
  • Cited by (82)

    • New Frameworks for Understanding Sudden Unexpected Deaths in Infancy (SUDI) in Socially Vulnerable Families

      2017, Journal of Pediatric Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      For many years, there have been known disparities in neonatal and postneonatal deaths between the richest 20% and poorest 20% of the population, and these disparities are greatest for postneonatal deaths (Lawn, Cousens, & Zupan, 2005; Luo et al., 2004). Deaths in the postneonatal period are, in the main, considered preventable, and largely associated with social determinants of health (Freemantle et al., 2006; Kleinman & Kiely, 1990). Approximately 94% of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI) occur in the postneonatal period where it is the leading category of death (Queensland Family and Child Commission, 2016).

    • Twenty-Five Year Survival of Children with Intellectual Disability in Western Australia

      2017, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although Aboriginal children are more likely to have an intellectual disability, with a greater risk of mild or moderate intellectual disability rather than severe intellectual disability,5 our study found that Aboriginal children with intellectual disability were not at any greater risk of mortality, compared with non-Aboriginal children with intellectual disability. However, within the cohort of children and young people without intellectual disability, we showed lower survival for Aboriginal compared with Caucasian children at all ages, as has been documented previously in the Australian population.16,33 This contradiction may be due to the fact that many Aboriginal children with intellectual disability have mild or moderate intellectual disability not necessarily associated with comorbid health conditions.5

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text