Original article
Rapid method for estimating the risk of acutely controversial side effects of prescription drugs

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90131-8Get rights and content

Abstract

When controversy suddenly erupts about the risk of using a prescription drug, there is an urgent need for fast methods of risk estimation. Some unexpected side-effects of prescription drugs are indications for the prescribing of another kind of drug. If the risk of such a side-effect is high, it should be reflected in clustered prescribing of the side-effect-alleviating drug in sequence with the side-effect-causing drug. The risk of drug-attributable side-effects can be estimated by comparing average incidences of initial prescriptions for the side-effect-alleviating drug before, during, and long after the dispensing of the presumed side-effect-causing drug. We monitored computerized, complete drug dispensing records of anonymous outpatients for use of flunarizine, an anti-vertigo/anti-migraine drug that case reports had suggested causes mental depression and/or Parkinsonism. Among 1284 patients who eventually got flunarizine during a 31 month period, 1 in 7 was started on an anti-depressant before or long after flunarizine; only 1 in 82 might be said to have been started on an anti-depressant because of flunarizine. There was no evidence that anti-Parkinson drugs were started because of flunarizine, though the numbers are small. The analysis takes only a few days, and can help set bounds on risks of the subset of adverse drug reactions that are themselves indications for use of other drugs.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Vulvo-vaginal candidiasis associated with acitretin

    1995, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
View all citing articles on Scopus

A preliminary report on a portion of this work has been published [1].

View full text