Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 43, Issue 5, September 1996, Pages 865-872
Social Science & Medicine

Translating research findings into health policy

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(96)00130-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Evidence of the influence of research on health policy is paradoxical. While there is scant evidence that research has had any impact on the direction or implementation of widespread health reforms, research on evidence-based medicine has dramatically increased, despite limited evidence that it has affected clinical practice. These developments have occurred in the context of a general decline in state intervention and provision and a post-modern questioning of researchers' authority. Models of the relationship between research and policy range from one where empirical research rationally informs decision-making, through research incrementally affecting policy, to an “enlightenment” or “infiltration” model, which may operate on a conceptual level. Health research that contributes to large-scale socio-political change may require more methodological pluralism and greater focus on key institutional structures. Case studies reviewed suggest that dissemination is enhanced if researchers involve managers and policy-makers in the development of the framework for and focus of research and if investigators assume a responsibility for seeing their research translated into policy. Public health research is more influential if topical, timely, well-funded and carried out by a collaborative team that includes academics. Evaluations are more influential if, in addition, they are commissioned by health authorities but based on local collection of data, and instruments and incentives to implement policy are available. In some areas, such as the recent policy focus on carers in the community, researchers were largely responsible for raising this policy issue, whereas in other areas, such as the relationship between unemployment and health, researchers are just one of the groups of experts making competing claims about causality. In conclusion, clear research findings are not always a passport to policy, but researchers can reframe the way health policy issues are seen, and collaboration with policy-makers initially can enhance implementation later, Copyright

References (40)

  • J. Ellis et al.

    Inpatient general medicine is evidence based

    Lancet

    (1995)
  • J.H. Ferguson
  • Ministry of Research, Science and Technology

    Drawing on the Evidence: Social Science Research and Government Policy

  • F. Fischer

    Reconstructing policy analysis: a postpositivist perspective

    Pol. Sciences

    (1993)
  • J. Lomas

    Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: who should do what?

    Ann. NY Acad. Sciences

    (1993)
  • H. Lasswell

    The policy orientation

  • C.E. Lindblom

    The Policy-Making Process

    (1980)
  • C.H. Weiss

    Evaluation research in the political context

  • C.H. Weiss

    The many meanings of research utilization

    Pub. Admin. Rev.

    (1979)
  • C.H. Weiss

    Improving the linkage between social research and public policy

  • Cited by (170)

    • Translating Research into Child Health Policy: Aligning Incentives and Building a New Discourse

      2023, Pediatric Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Raising the quality of the debate about health issues to include scholarly evidence as well as anecdotes and biases.5 The worlds of research and health policy often have challenges talking to each other, however, as research findings are not easily accessed by policy makers and are additionally laden with technical jargon, complex statistical models, and associations rather than the clear cause and effect conclusions with specific policy recommendations.6 There are examples in the last few decades of translating research into public policy in the pediatric space, including research demonstrating the association of infants safe sleeping and suddent infant death syndrome (SIDS) deaths which launched the “back to sleep” campaign.

    • Knowledge and power in policy-making for child survival in Niger

      2017, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      To date, nearly all African countries have adopted some form of iCCM policy (Rasanathan et al., 2014). In recent years, calls have increased to move toward evidence-informed decision-making in global health and public policy following observations in the 1990s and 2000s that policies did not reflect evidence as much as they could and that stores of useful research were going to waste (Davis and Howden-Chapman, 1996; Hanney et al., 2003; Lavis et al., 2002). Concurrently, new directions are emerging in the types of knowledge considered relevant to health policy making, with a growing consensus that earlier conceptions of evidence, defined “statistical inference about events in populations that are studied prospectively,” were too narrow and should be expanded to include observational and qualitative studies and health policy and systems research (HPSR) (Black, 2001; Fox, 2005; Sturm, 2002).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text