Why are socioeconomic mortality differences smaller among women than among men?

doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90276-3

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 38, Issue 10, May 1994, Pages 1385-1396

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90276-3 Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examines whether women's socioeconomic mortality differences appear to be smaller than those of men because of: (1) the choice of indicator used in measuring socioeconomic position; (2) the confounding influence of other sociodemographic variables, either masking women's inequities or accentuating them among men; or (3) differences in the cause of death structure between women and men.

The data set is based on individual records of the 1980 census linked with death records for the period 1981–1985 in the 35–64-year old population in Finland.

According to each of the socioeconomic indicators applied in this study (level of education, occupational class, housing density and standard of equipment of the dwelling) the relative magnitude of inequalities among women is considerably smaller than among men. This result arises totally from the married subpopulation—in other marital status groups women's inequalities are at least as large as men's. In most causes of death the socioeconomic mortality gradient is as steep or even steeper among women in comparison with men. When the cause of death structure of men is applied to the cause-specific mortality differences of women, the socioeconomic gradient in total mortality is almost similar among both genders even in the married population.

References (19)

E. Lahelma et al.
Health and social inequalities in Finland and elsewhere
Soc. Sci. Med.
(1990)
A. Wagstaff et al.
On the measurement of inequalities in health
Soc. Sci. Med.
(1991)
WHO
T. Valkonen
Social inequality in the face of death
T. Valkonen
Adult mortality and level of education: a comparison of six countries
E. Powell-Griner et al.
New data on socio-economic differential mortality in the United States
F. Pagnanelli
Les differences de mortalite en Italie selon certains facteurs socio-economiques: une synthese des informations
T. Valkonen et al.
Socio-economic Mortality Differences in Finland 1981–1990
Statistics Finland, Population 1993
(1993)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (186)

Social inequalities in health less pronounced in women than in men: A question of measurements?
2016, Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique
Chez les femmes, les inégalités sociales de mortalité sont généralement bien moins grandes que chez les hommes. Y-a-t-il une plus grande homogénéité des risques et des comportements de santé parmi les femmes, ou bien est-ce un problème de mesure et une sous-estimation chez elles de ces inégalités ? Cet article balaie différents travaux de recherche basés sur différentes dimensions de la santé et sur différentes définitions du statut social. Leurs résultats montrent qu’il y a de larges inégalités sociales de santé aussi parmi les femmes. Les carrières, les histoires familiales et le cumul d’activités permettent de révéler des déterminants sociaux de la santé auxquels les femmes sont largement exposées. L’article souligne la nécessité d’élargir la notion d’inégalités sociales et de redéfinir les catégories, notamment en considérant les parcours des hommes et des femmes et les différentes sphères d’activités. Il en ressort que les différences de santé entre hommes et femmes sont elles-mêmes en partie socialement construites, comme le suggèrent les approches de genre en sciences sociales.
Social inequalities in mortality are generally less pronounced for women than for men. Are women's health risks and behaviours more homogeneous, or does this pattern arise from a measurement issue inducing an under-estimation of these inequalities? This article reviews a number of studies covering different dimensions of health and different dimensions of social status. Their findings show that there are large social inequalities in health among women. The focus on the working careers, family histories and conciliation of multiple activities provides evidence of major social determinants of health to which women are widely exposed. This article highlights the need to broaden the notion of social inequality and to redefine the social categories, notably by considering the distinct trajectories of men and women and their different spheres of activity. It highlights that gender differences in health are themselves partly socially constructed, as suggested by the gender approaches in the social sciences.
Living arrangements as determinants of myocardial infarction incidence and survival: A prospective register study of over 300,000 Finnish men and women
2015, Social Science and Medicine
Living with a spouse is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease mortality in middle age, but it remains unclear whether marriage and other living arrangements are important both for the development of the disease and the survival following incidence. Cohabitation and living alone have also become more common in many Western societies and thus warrant further study. We explored the association between living arrangements and myocardial infarction (MI) incidence and fatality. We used a population-based register sample of adults aged 40–60 in Finland in 1995 (n = 302,885) followed up until the end of 2007. MI incidence and mortality were identified from hospital discharge records and cause of death register (5917 incident cases in men and 1632 in women). Living with a marital partner was contrasted to three alternatives: cohabiting with non-marital partner, co-residence with persons other than a partner and living alone. MI incidence and long-term fatality were analysed with Cox proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariates and first-day fatality with logistic regression. Men who were married had a lower risk of MI incidence even after adjusting for socioeconomic factors – i.e. education, occupation, income, wealth and employment status – with small differences between the other living arrangement groups. For women the effects of living arrangements on incidence were fully explained by the same socioeconomic factors. However, our findings revealed that living arrangements were strong determinants for survival after MI independent of other socio-demographic factors. The results demonstrate greater fatality associated with living alone in men and suggest that cohabitation in midlife may be associated with a greater fatality risk in women. The social support and control offered by a marital relationship may protect from MI fatality in particular.
The mediating effect of effort-reward imbalance in household and family work on the relationship between education and women's health
2015, Social Science and Medicine
Occupational stress as a key determinant for explaining health inequalities has been well established while the impact of stress related to family work has rarely been considered. This study investigates whether stress in household and family work may contribute to health inequalities in women. We used a population-based sample of German mothers (n = 3129) to determine the total, direct and indirect effects of education on somatic complaints by means of OLS regression-based mediation models. Inference about indirect effects was determined by 95% bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals. Education was assessed by a measure combining school education and vocational training. Stress was measured using the adopted effort-reward-imbalance (ERI) questionnaire for household and family work. The von Zerssen list of somatic complaints was used as measure of subjective health. We found a significant total effect of education on somatic complaints (p ≤ 0.001) as well as significant indirect effects through ‘effort’ (p = 0.006) and ‘reward’ in household and family work (p ≤ 0.001). However, the subscales of ERI pointed into different directions: while levels of ‘effort’ increased with women's educational attainment, levels of distress related to low ‘reward’ decreased with higher levels of education. Our findings suggest that the effect of women's education on somatic complaints is mediated through stress related to low reward for household and family work. In particular, lack of ‘societal esteem’ for household and family work contributed to health disadvantages in lower educated mothers. We conclude that research on health inequality would benefit from taking stressful experiences in household and family work greater into account.
Health-related quality of life after adverse bleeding events associated with antithrombotic drug therapy – A systematic review
2019, Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Little is known about the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following adverse bleeding events associated with antithrombotic drug therapy. This systematic review assesses the HRQOL of patients who suffered a bleeding event related to antithrombotic drug use. A literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception through June 16, 2017. Studies measuring HRQOL after a bleeding event related to antithrombotic drug therapy for primary or secondary prevention of a thromboembolic event were included. Four studies with a total of 13,209 patients met the inclusion criteria, and of them, 3,649 patients developed a bleeding event. Patients who were included received antithrombotic drugs because of acute myocardial infarction or atrial fibrillation. EQ-5D, SF-36, and GHP MOS-13 were used to measure HRQOL. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 29 months. Patients who suffered a bleeding event reported worse HRQOL compared to those who did not (EQ-5D – average increase on all domains of 0.09, p-values ranging from <0.001 to 0.003; SF-36 – average decrease on all domains of 21.4, p < 0.001; and GHP MOS-13 score – decrease of 11.9 points, p < 0.05) and an increased health concern (13.4-point increase; p < 0.05). In conclusion, adverse bleeding events occurring because of the use of antithrombotic agents are associated with a clinically relevant lower HRQOL and hence deserve more attention as part of the shared decision-making process between patients and providers. These data should be valuable for facilitating more substantive care and risk discussions regarding potential changes in outcome and rehabilitation.
Risk factor control and incident cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes: Sex-specific relations
2024, Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Aging People’s Health in China
2022, Journal of Family and Economic Issues

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Why are socioeconomic mortality differences smaller among women than among men?

Abstract

Soc. Sci. Med.

Soc. Sci. Med.

Social inequality in the face of death

Adult mortality and level of education: a comparison of six countries

New data on socio-economic differential mortality in the United States

Les differences de mortalite en Italie selon certains facteurs socio-economiques: une synthese des informations

Socio-economic Mortality Differences in Finland 1981–1990

Statistics Finland, Population 1993