Somatisation and illness behaviour

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(89)90041-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Illness behaviour patterns were evaluated in 31 psychiatric patients, who had predominant somatic complaints to which there were no organic basis, using the Illness Behaviour Assessment Schedule. Psychiatric examination was also done and diagnosis given according to ICD-9. The relationship between abnormal illness behaviour and certain socio-demographic variables was examined. Younger patients more often had disease phobia (p = 0.05) and pre-occupation with disease (p = 0.003). Interesting trends were observed in different religious groups, as regards their beliefs about the ‘cause’ of somatic symptoms. Patients diagnosed as neurotic (anxiety or depression) significantly more often (p = 0.024) regarded their illnesses to be somatic in origin. The relationship between somatisation and abnormal illness behaviour is found to be complex, and the cause-effect relationship is not fully understood.

References (10)

  • D Mechanic

    The concept of illness behaviour

    J chron Dis

    (1962)
  • ZJ Lipowski

    Somatization: a border land between medicine and psychiatry

    Can Med Ass J

    (1986)
  • LJ Kirmayer

    Culture, affect and somatization

    Transcult Psychiat Res Rev

    (1984)
  • I Pilowsky

    Abnormal illness behaviour

    Br J med Psych

    (1969)
  • CV Ford

    The Somatising Disorders: Illness as a Way of Life

    (1983)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • A retrospective observational study investigating the relationship between somatisation and pain perception in subjects with intractable pain

    2016, European Journal of Integrative Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In other words, somatisation, the manifestation of emotional problems as bodily symptoms [1], may be implicated in cases of intractable pain. Being related to emotional components in origin, somatic symptoms are poorly controlled by the usual medical treatments for pain, and lead afflicted individuals to consult a series of health professionals (doctor shopping) in the conviction that they have a physical disease, despite reassurances to the contrary [3–6]. Patients who take on this “sick role” are said to display so-called abnormal illness behaviour (AIB), which studies show is closely related to somatisation and medically unexplained syndromes [7] and leads to the perpetuation of pain and a worsening of treatment response [8].

  • Cultural and developmental factors affecting the presentation of somatic symptoms in depression: The case of turkish patients

    2012, Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Indian patients with depressive symptoms may also be more stigmatized than those with somatic symptoms.30 Also, younger and female patients from rural backgrounds may focus more on somatic symptoms; with especially gastro-intestinal problems being reported.11,28–30 Depression may be more common among Punjabis (esp.

  • The measurement of abnormal illness behavior: Toward a new research agenda for the Illness Behavior Questionnaire

    2008, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the psychiatric domain, the IBQ has been used to measure the reporting of physical symptoms in the absence of accompanying pathology such as in the case of somatoform disorders including somatization disorder, conversion disorder, hypochondriasis, and body dysmorphic disorder [3]. Both individuals with somatic symptoms receiving inpatient care [27,49] and those seeking outpatient psychiatric care [36,49–51] have been studied. AIB has also been studied among individuals with a psychiatric diagnosis of panic disorder [52,53] and hysteria [54].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Currently at: Psychological Medicine Group, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 9BX, U.K.

View full text