Report of an NHLBI Working Conference on Coronary Heart Disease in Black Populations
A note on the biologic concept of race and its application in epidemiologic research

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(84)90662-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Use of the category of race in epidemiologic research presupposes scientific validity for a system that divides man into subspecies. Although the significance of race may be clear-cut in many practical situations, an adequate theoretical construct based on biologic principles does not exist. Anthropologists have in large measure abandoned the biologic concept of race, and its persistent widespread use in epidemiology is a scientific anachronism. The assumption that race designates important genetic factors in a population is in most cases false. Racial definitions should be seen as primarily social in origin and should be clues to environmental—rather than genetic—causes of disease. An understanding of the social forces leading to racial differentials in health will give further direction to preventive campaigns.

References (38)

  • FG Dunn et al.

    Racial differences in cardiac adaptation to essential hypertension determined by echocardiographic indexes

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1983)
  • T Dobzhansky

    Genetic diversity and human equality

    (1973)
  • WC Boyd

    Genetics and the human race

    Science

    (1963)
  • V Woodward

    Heredity and human society

    (1981)
  • A Chase

    The legacy of Malthus: The social costs of the new scientific racism

    (1980)
  • TF Gossett

    Race: The history of an idea in America

    (1965)
  • ES Watt

    The biological race concept and the diseases of modern man

  • PR Ehrlich et al.

    A biological view of race

  • WC Boyd

    Genetics and the races of man

  • SJ Gould

    Ever since Darwin: Reflections in natural history

    (1979)
  • T Dobzhansky

    Comment on Livingstone

    Curr Anthropol

    (1962)
  • T Dobzhansky et al.

    Evolution

    (1977)
  • CS Coon

    The origin of races

    (1962)
  • NA Barnicot

    Taxonomy and variation in modern man

  • B Glass

    Genes and the man

    (1943)
  • RC Lewontin

    Apportionment of human diversity

    Evol Biol

    (1972)
  • JR Paul

    The epidemiology of rheumatic fever

    (1957)
  • GH Stollerman

    Rheumatic fever and streptococcal infection

    (1975)
  • Cited by (142)

    • The Use of Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health in Three Pediatrics Journals

      2022, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The call for reform and intentionality when reporting R&E in research is not new.4 The utility of R&E categories and how to obtain those data has been controversial in medical research since at least the 1980s.20 In 2015, the American Academy of Pediatrics encouraged researchers to be more thoughtful about considerations of including R&E data and the need for SDOH data to interpret these data meaningfully.21

    • Does place explain racial health disparities? Quantifying the contribution of residential context to the Black/white health gap in the United States

      2008, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, as most genetic variation is within—rather than between—populations (Evans, Hodge, & Pless, 1994), genetics alone is unlikely to be a major determinant of population health. This must be recognized when interpreting the race residual (i.e., race coefficient) in health disparities as race is often so confounded with different definitions based on language commonalities and on regional and national origins, that it is an ineffective construct of genetic variability (Cooper, 1984; Goodman, 2000; Shields et al., 2005; Smedley & Smedley, 2005). Hence, race is likely to capture many social and cultural characteristics that are often unmeasured or incorrectly measured in survey research (Frank, 2007).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text