Skip to main content
Log in

Increases in Lifestyle Activities as a Result of Experience Corps® Participation

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experience Corps® (EC) was designed to simultaneously increase cognitive, social, and physical activity through high-intensity volunteerism in elementary school classrooms. It is, therefore, highly likely that EC participation may alter pre-existing patterns of lifestyle activity. This study examined the impact of “real-world” volunteer engagement on the frequency of participation in various lifestyle activities over a 2-year period. Specifically, we examined intervention-related changes on reported activity levels at 12 and 24 months post-baseline using Intention-to-Treat (ITT) and Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) analyses, which account for the amount of program exposure. ITT analyses indicated that, compared to the control group, EC participants reported modest increases (approximately half a day/month) in overall activity level, especially in intellectual and physical activities 12 months post-baseline. Increases in activity were not found at the 24-month assessment. CACE models revealed similar findings for overall activity as well as for intellectual and physical activities at 12 months. Additionally, CACE findings suggested modest increases in social activity at 12 months and in intellectual and passive activities at 24 months post-baseline. This community-based, health promotion intervention has the potential to impact lifestyle activity, which may lead to long-term increases in activity and to other positive cognitive, physical, and psychosocial health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIGURE 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett DA, Arnold SE, Valenzuela MJ, Brayne C, Schneider JA. Cognitive and social lifestyle: links with neuropathology and cognition in late life. Acta Neuropathol. 2014; 127: 137–150.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9: 58–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hong S, Hasche L, Bowland S. Structural relationships between social activities and longitudinal trajectories of depression among older adults. Gerontologist. 2009; 49: 1–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang HX, Xu W, Pei JJ. Leisure activities, cognition, and dementia. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1822; 2012: 482–491.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson RS, Barnes LL, Aggarwal NT, et al. Cognitive activity and the cognitive morbidity of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2010; 75: 990–996.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. James BD, Boyle PA, Buchman AS, Bennett DA. Relation of late-life social activity with incident disability among community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Med Sci. 2011; 66: 467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paganini-Hill A, Kawas CH, Corrada MM. Activities and mortality in the elderly: the Leisure World Cohort Study. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Med Sci. 2011; 66: 559–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell MB, Cimino CR, Benitez A, et al. Cognitively stimulating activities: effects on cognition across four studies with up to 21 years of longitudinal data. J Aging Res. 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/461592.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Small BJ, Dixon RA, McArdle JJ, Grimm KJ. Do changes in lifestyle engagement moderate cognitive decline in normal aging? Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Neuropsychology. 2012; 26: 144–155.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson MC, Parisi JM, Xia J, et al. Lifestyle activities and memory: variety may be the spice of life. The Women’s Health and Aging Study II. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012; 18: 286–294.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nilsson I, Löfgren B, Fisher AG, Bernspång B. Focus on leisure repertoire in the oldest old: the Umeå 85 study. J Appl Gerontol. 2006; 25: 391–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stine-Morrow EAL, Basak C. Cognitive interventions. In: Schaie KW, Willis SL, eds. Handbook of the psychology of aging. 7th ed. New York, NY: Elsevier; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fried LP, Carlson MC, Freedman M, et al. A social model for health promotion for an aging population: initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. J Urban Health. 2004; 81: 64–78.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fried LP, Carlson MC, McGill S, et al. Experience Corps: a dual trial to promote the health of older adults and children’s academic success. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013; 36: 1–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rebok GW, Barron JS, Carlson MC, et al. Experience Corps®: a civic engagement-based public health intervention. In: Hartman-Stein PE, La Rue A, eds. Enhancing cognitive fitness in adults: a handbook for the development of community based programs. New York, NY: Springer; 2011: 469–488.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Morrow-Howell N, Hong S-L, McCrary S, Blinne W. Changes in activity among older volunteers. Res Aging. 2012; 34: 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parisi JM, Rebok GW, Seeman TE, et al. Lifestyle activities in sociodemographically at-risk urban, older adults prior to participation in the Baltimore Experience Corps trial. Act Adapt Aging. 2012; 36: 242–260.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frangakis CE, Rubin DB. Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics. 2002; 58: 21–29.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jo B. Estimation of intervention effects with noncompliance: alternative model specifications. J Educ Behav Stat. 2002; 27: 385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yau LHY, Little RJ. Inference for the complier-average causal effect from longitudinal data subject to noncompliance and missing data, with application to a job training assessment for the unemployed. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001; 96: 1232–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheik J, Yesavage J. Geriatric depression scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In: Brink TL, ed. Clinical Gerontology: a Guide to Assessment and Intervention. New York, NY: Haworth Press; 1986: 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189–198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hultsch DF, Hertzog C, Small BJ, Dixon RA. Use it or lose it: engaged lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline in aging? Psychol Aging. 1999; 14: 245–263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jopp D, Hertzog C. Activities, self-referent memory beliefs, and cognitive performance: evidence for direct and mediated relations. Psychol Aging. 2007; 22: 811–825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Verghese J, Lipton RB, Katz MJ, et al. Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 2508–2516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Little RJ, D’Agostino R, Cohen ML, et al. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1355–1360.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2011.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fratiglioni L, Wang HX. Brain reserve hypothesis in dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2007; 12: 11–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grøntved A, Hu FB. Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011; 305: 2448–2455.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Mishra GD. Television- and screen-based activity and mental well-being in adults. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38: 375–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996–2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41: 207–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moore SC, Patel AV, Matthews CE, et al. Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis. PLoS Med. 2012; 9: e1001335.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Carlson MC, Varma VR. Activity and neurocognitive health in older adults. In: Waldstein SR, Elias MF, eds. Neuropsychology of cardiovascular disease. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Carlson MC, Seplaki CL, Seeman TE. Reversing the impact of disparities in socioeconomic status over the life course on cognitive and brain aging. In: Wolfe B, Evans WN, Seeman TE, eds. The biological consequences of socioeconomic inequalities. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2012: 215–247.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Varma VR, Tan EJ, Wang T, et al. Low-intensity walking activity is associated with better health. J Appl Gerontol. 2014; 33: 870–887.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fogel J, Carlson MC. Soap operas and talk shows on television are associated with poorer cognition in older women. South Med J. 2006; 99: 226–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute on Aging (P01 AG027735), the John A. Hartford Foundation, and the Johns Hopkins Older Americans Independence Center under contracts P30-AG02133 and R37-AG19905 from the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health. The authors would also like to thank the Greater Homewood Community Corporation, Experience Corps National, Civic Ventures, the Baltimore City Public School System, the City of Baltimore, the Commission on Aging and Retirement Education, the Baltimore City Retirees Association, AARP, the Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, and The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation for ongoing vision and support. Special thanks to all the staff and volunteers of the Baltimore Experience Corps who have made this all possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanine M. Parisi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parisi, J.M., Kuo, J., Rebok, G.W. et al. Increases in Lifestyle Activities as a Result of Experience Corps® Participation. J Urban Health 92, 55–66 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9918-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9918-z

Keywords

Navigation