Abstract
Drug addiction is a major public health problem, one that is most acutely felt in major cities around the globe. Harm reduction and safe injection sites are an attempt to address this problem and are at the cutting edge of public health policy and practice. One of the most studied safe injection sites is INSITE located in Vancouver, British Columbia. Using INSITE as a case study, this paper argues that knowledge translation offers a limited framework for understanding the development of public health policy. This paper also argues that the experience of INSITE suggests that science and social justice, the meta-ideas that lie at the core of the public health enterprise, are an inadequate basis for a theory of public health policy making. However, on a more positive note, INSITE also shows the value of concepts drawn from the ways in which political science analyzes the policy process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Debeck K, Kerr T. The use of knowledge translation and legal proceedings to support evidence-based drug policy in Canada: opportunities and ongoing challenges. Open Med. 2010; 4(3).
Kerr T, Montaner J, Wood E. Supervised injecting facilities: time for scale-up? Lancet. 2008; 372(9636): 354–355.
Hathaway AD, Tousaw KI. Harm reduction headway and continuing resistance: insights from safe injection in the city of Vancouver. Int J Drug Policy. 2008; 19(1): 11–16.
Hwang SW. Science and ideology. Open Med. 2007; 1(2): 99–101.
Dooling K, Rachlis M. Vancouver’s supervised injection facility challenges Canada’s drug laws. Can Med Assoc J. 2010; 182(13): 1440–1444.
Cain J. Report of the task force into illicit narcotic overdose deaths in British Columbia. Victoria: Ministry of Attorney General; 1994.
Campbell L, Boyd N, Culbert L. A thousand dreams: Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside and the fight for its future. Vancouver: Greystone Books; 2009.
McCann EJ. Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s “four pillar” drug strategy. Environ Plann A. 2008; 40(4): 885–904.
Kerr T, MacPherson D, Wood E. Establishing North America’s first safer injection facility: lessons from the Vancouver experience. In: Stevens A, ed. Crossing frontiers: international developments in the treatment of drug dependence. Brighton: Pavilion Publishing; 2008: 109–129.
Martin L. Harperland: the politics of control. Toronto: Viking Canada; 2010.
Wells P. Harper swings and misses on Insite. Macleans. 2011. Available at: http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/10/10/swing-and-a-miss/#.TpNZ-OjrJMQ. Accessed October 10, 2011
Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ. 2009; 181: 165e8.
Murphy K, Fafard P. Knowledge translation and social epidemiology: taking power, politics, and values seriously. In: O’Campo P, Dunn R, eds. Rethinking social epidemiology: towards a science of change. New York: Springer; 2011. http://www.springer.com/biomed/book/978-94-007-2137-1. Accessed March 27, 2012
Uchtenhagen A. Heroin-assisted treatment in Switzerland: a case study in policy change. Addiction. 2010; 105(1): 29–37.
Kerr T, Stoltz J-A, Tyndall M, et al. Impact of a medically supervised safer injection facility on community drug use patterns: a before and after study. BMJ. 2006; 332(7535): 220–222.
Hathaway A. Ushering in another harm reduction era? Discursive authenticity, drug policy and research. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005; 24(6): 549–550.
Jenson J. Getting to sewers and sanitation: doing public health within nineteenth-century britain’s citizenship regimes. Polit Soc. 2008; 36(4): 532–556.
Tilson H, Berkowitz B. The public health enterprise: examining our twenty-first-century policy challenges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006; 25(4): 900–910.
Bernier NF, Clavier C. Public health policy research: making the case for a political science approach. Heal Promot Int. 2011; 26(1): 109–116.
Fafard P. Evidence and healthy public policy: insights from health and political sciences. Montreal: National Collaborating Centre on Healthy Public Policy/Canadian Policy Research Networks; 2008.
Bowen S, Zwi AB. Pathways to “evidence-informed” policy and practice: a framework for action. PLoS Med. 2005; 2(7): e166.
Lomas J, Brown AD. Research and advice giving: a functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian Ministry of Health. Milbank Q. 2009; 87(4): 903–926.
Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Waye Perry B. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q. 2007; 85(4): 729–768.
Kerner JF. Integrating research, practice, and policy: what we see depends on where we stand. J Publ Health Manag Pract. 2008; 14(2): 193–199.
Hawe P, Potvin L. What is population health intervention research? Rev Can Sante Publique. 2009; 100(1): I8–I14.
Levy B, Sidel V. Social injustice and public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Edwards N. Revisiting our social justice roots in population health intervention research. Rev Can Sante Publique. 2009; 100(6): 405–406.
Gostin LO, Powers M. What does social justice require for the public’s health? Public health ethics and policy imperatives. Heal Aff. 2006; 25(4): 1053–1060.
Alderman J, Dollar KM, Holtz TH. Commentary: understanding the origins of anger, contempt, and disgust in public health policy disputes: applying moral psychology to harm reduction debates. J Public Health Pol. 2010; 31(1): 1–16.
Powers M, Faden R. Social justice: the moral foundations of public health and health policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Fry CL, Khoshnood K, Power R, Sharma M. Harm reduction ethics: acknowledging the values and beliefs behind our actions. Int J Drug Pol. 2008; 19(1): 1–3.
Pauly B. Harm reduction through a social justice lens. Int J Drug Pol. 2008; 19(1): 4–10.
Cash C. Insite, foresight, hindsight. Macleans.ca. 2010. Available at: http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/01/19/insite-foresight-hindsight/#idc-container. Accessed January 21, 2010
Weinstock D. The political ethics of health. Les ateliers de l’éthique. 2010; 5(1): 15.
Bayoumi A, Guta A. Values and social epidemiological research. In: Rethinking social epidemiology: towards a science of change. New York: Springer; (in press)
Rawls J. A theory of justice: revised edition. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1999. Revised edition.
Nozick R. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books; 1974.
Cohen GA. Rescuing justice and equality. 1st ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2008.
Sen A. The idea of justice. 1st ed. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2009.
Beaglehole R, Bonita R. Public health at the crossroads: which way forward? Lancet. 1998; 351(9102): 590–592.
Breton E, Richard L, Gagnon F, Jacques M, Bergeron P. Health promotion research and practice require sound policy analysis models: the case of Quebec’s Tobacco Act. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(11): 1679–1689.
Exworthy M. Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: using conceptual models to understand the policy process. Health Pol Plann. 2008; 23(5): 318–327.
Kübler D. Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: an application to Swiss drug policy. J Eur Publ Pol. 2001; 8(4): 623–641.
Acknowledgments
This work has been funded in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) under grant #101693, entitled “Power, Politics, and the Use of Health Equity Research.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fafard, P. Public Health Understandings of Policy and Power: Lessons from INSITE. J Urban Health 89, 905–914 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9698-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9698-2