Abstract
Introduction: Chinese is the world’s largest ethnic group but few health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures have been tested on them. The aim of this study was to determine if the standard SF-12 was valid and equivalent for a Chinese population. Methods: The SF-36 data of 2410 Chinese adults randomly selected from the general population of Hong Kong (HK) were analysed. The Chinese (HK) specific SF-12 items and scoring algorithm were derived from the HK Chinese population data by multiple regressions. The SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were used as criteria to assess the content and criterion validity of the SF-12. The standard and Chinese (HK) specific SF-12 PCS and MCS scores were compared for equivalence. Results: The standard SF-12 explained 82% and 89% of the variance of the SF-36 PCS and MCS scores, respectively, and the effect size differences between the standard SF-36 and SF-12 scores were less than 0.3. Six of the Chinese (HK) specific SF-12 items were different from those of the standard SF-12, but the effect size differences between the Chinese (HK) specific and standard SF-12 scores were mostly less than 0.3. Conclusions: The standard SF-12 was valid and equivalent for the Chinese, which would enable more Chinese to be included in clinical trials that measure HRQoL.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CLK Lam B Gandek XS Ren MS Chan (1998) ArticleTitleTests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 51 1139–1147
CLK Lam (2003) ArticleTitleReliability and construct validity of the Chinese (Hong Kong) SF-36 for patients in primary care. H K Pract 25 468–475
Lam CLK, Tse EYY, Gandek B. Construct validity, reliability and equivalence of the SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales in a Chinese population (under review).
J Thumboo KY Fong SP Chan et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe equivalence of English and Chinese SF-36 versions in bilingual Singapore Chinese. Qual Life Res 11 495–503
J Thumboo KY Fong D Machin et al. (2001) ArticleTitleA community-based study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore. Qual Life Res 10 175–188
JE Ware M Kosinski SD Keller (Eds) (1995) How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. EditionNumber7 The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Boston
JE Ware M Kosinski SD Keller (1996) ArticleTitleA 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34 220–233 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 Occurrence Handle8628042
B Gandek JE Ware NK Aaronson (1998) ArticleTitleCross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol 51 1171–1178 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fjt1Shtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9817135
JE Ware M Kosinski (2001) Norm-based scoring for physical and mental summary measures. JE Ware M Kosinski (Eds) SF-36 Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1. Lincoln QualityMetric, Inc. Rhode Island 28–35
F Guillemin C Bombardier D Beaton (1993) ArticleTitleCross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46 1417–1432 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD1cjis1Q%3D Occurrence Handle8263569
E McColl T Christiansen C Konig-Zahn (1997) Making the right choice of outcome measure. A Hutchinson N Bentzen C Konig-Zahn (Eds) Cross Cultural Health Outcome Assessment: A User’s Guide. European Research Group on Health Outcomes Ruinen, The Netherlands 12–26
LLY Lim JD Fisher (1999) ArticleTitleUse of the 12-item Short-Form (SF-12) Health Survey in an Australian heart and stroke population. Qual Life Res 8 1–8
JB Bjorner S Kreiner JE Ware MT Damsgaard P Berch (1998) ArticleTitleDifferential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 51 1189–1202
M Herdman J Fox-Rushby X Badia (1998) ArticleTitleA model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: The universalist approach. Qual Life Res 7 323–335
M Bullinger (1994) Ensuring international equivalence of quality of life measures: Problems and approaches to solutions. J Orley W Kuyken (Eds) Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Springler-Verlag Berlin 33–40
CLK Lam IJ Lauder TP Lam B Gandek (1999) ArticleTitlePopulation based norming of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey. H K Pract 21 460–470
CLK Lam DYT Fong IJ Lauder TP Lam (2002) ArticleTitleThe effect of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on health service utilisation of a Chinese population. Soc Sci Med 55 1635–1646
Census & Statistics Department Hong Kong, Main Tables of the 2001 Population Census. Hong Kong: Census & Statistics Department, HKSAR; 2002.
B Gandek JE Ware (1998) ArticleTitleMethods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: The IQOLA Project approach. J Clin Epidemiol 51 953–959
CLK Lam IJ Lauder TPD Lam (2003) ArticleTitleThe impact of chronic diseases on health services and quality of life of a Chinese population. Asia Pacific Fam Med 2 98–106
LE Kazis JJ Anderson RF Meenan (1989) ArticleTitleEffect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27 S178–S189
KW Wyrwich NA Nienaber WM Tierney FD Wolinsky (1999) ArticleTitleLinking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 37 469–478
J Cohen (1988) The t-test for measures. J Cohen (Eds) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, New Jersey 19–74
GR Norman FG Sridhar SD Walter GH Guyatt (2001) ArticleTitleThe relation of distribution- and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health related quality of life. Med Care 39 1039–1047
R Holman R Lindeboom M Vermeulen CAW Glas RJ Haan Particlede (2002) ArticleTitleThe Amsterdam Linear Disability Score (ALDS) Project, differential item functioning with regard to gender. QOL Newsleter 29 13–14
SM Skevington (2002) ArticleTitleAdvancing cross-cultural research on quality of life: Observations drawn from the WHOQoL development. Qual Life Res 11 135–144
SM Skevington J Bradshaw S Saxena (1999) ArticleTitleSelecting national items for the WHOQoL: Conceptual and psychometric considerations. Soc Sci Med 48 473–487
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lam, C.L., Tse, E.Y. & Gandek, B. Is the standard SF-12 Health Survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population?. Qual Life Res 14, 539–547 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-0704-3
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-0704-3