Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring patterns of environmental injustice in the Global South: Maquiladoras in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decades of research in countries of the Global North have revealed distinct environmental injustices whereby industrial hazards tend to be located in poor and minority neighborhoods; few studies have investigated similar relationships between humans and hazards in the Global South. This study uses conventional quantitative environmental justice methodology to investigate spatial relationships between residential socio-demographics and maquiladoras (i.e., final assembly plants) in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. When predicting maquiladora density using percent children and social class in a spatial error regression model, we find that percent children was a positive and significant predictor, while social class was not significant. Adding formal residential development to the model, social class becomes a negative and significant predictor. Formal residential development and percent children are also positive and significant. As is the case in the Global North, relationships between neighborhood characteristics and transnationally operated maquiladoras along the northern border of Mexico are linked to urban development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Of the 50 largest maquiladoras in Mexico in 2002, 36 were owned by American Corporations; Japanese Corporations owned the second largest share with seven (Frey 2003).

  2. The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) is a publicly available database compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency. Federal facilities and certain industries are required to report annually on toxic chemical releases and waste management activities. The TRI database facilitates public access to these data (see www.epa.gov for additional information).

  3. While race/ethnicity is typically used alongside social class in studies done in the US, this information is not reported in the Mexican census and therefore not included in the analysis. Race and ethnicity are less commonly employed in studies done outside the US, and even if they had been available here, this study makes transparent the socially constructed nature of these categories in environmental justice work. Hispanic, for example, would not be a very meaningful indicator of social marginality in a study in Mexico, despite its applicability in the US context. A more useful variable in the Mexican context would be the proportion of indigenous people living in each neighborhood, although this information is not collected by the Mexican census.

  4. Mexico collects income data in four categories: number of persons making less than minimum wage, one-to-two times the minimum wage, three-to-five times the minimum wage, and over five times the minimum wage. To create a mean income variable using these categories, we took the following steps. We first took the daily minimum wage in Mexico in 1999 and 2000 ($3.99 in US dollars) and created actual monetary income categories using that figure. Then, the number of people in each income category was multiplied by the mid-point income value and then the groups were summed and divided by the neighborhood’s employed population. We felt it necessary to create this mean income variable because it is the most commonly used measure of social class in environmental justice studies.

  5. We ran a third model testing an interaction effect between social class and formal development, but the coefficient was not statistically significant (beta = −145; = .156).

  6. Had we used classic OLS regression as opposed to the spatial error model, we would not have uncovered this negative effect between social class and hazard. When using OLS regression (in SAS 9.2), we found that social class had a significant and positive effect (< 0.04) on maquiladora density when controlling for formal development and percent children. This sign change underscores the importance of accounting for spatial autocorrelation in environmental justice analysis using regression. Findings for children and formal development were similar between the OLS and spatial error regression model.

  7. This shift is not related to the consideration of percent children. In a bivariate spatial error regression model predicting maquiladora density using only social class, social class was not significant (beta = −.073, = .298).

  8. Davis (1999) contrasts the facilitation of Malibu elites with that of the poor predominantly Central American immigrant population residing in the inner city tenements of Los Angeles’ Westlake district. This socially marginal community has been subject to a vicious cycle of inadequate regulation and negligent enforcement that has contributed to an urban fire crisis of extraordinarily lethal proportions (Davis 1999).

References

  • Adeola, F. O. (2000). Cross-national environmental injustice and human rights issues—A review of evidence in the developing world. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 686–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderton, D. L., Anderson, A. B., Rossi, P. H., Oakes, J. M., Fraser, M. R., Weber, E. W., et al. (1994). Hazardous waste facilities: ‘Environmental equity’ issues in metropolitan areas. Evaluation Review, 18, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Syabri, I., & Kho, Y. (2006). GeoDa: An introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis, 38, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arreola, D. D., & Curtis, J. R. (1993). The Mexican border cities: Landscape anatomy and place personality. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden, B. M., Noonan, D. S., & Turaga, R. M. R. (2007). Scales of justice: Is there a geographic bias in environmental equity analysis? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(2), 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, C. H. C., Sandlin, G., Bassok, A., & Kim, S. (2007). The exposure of disadvantaged populations in freeway air-pollution sheds: A case study of the Seattle and Portland regions. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 34(1), 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcazar, H., Denman, C., & Lara, F. (1995). Factors associated with work-related accidents and sickness among Maquiladora workers—The case of Nogales, Sonora, Mexico. International Journal of Health Services, 25(3), 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, H. L. (2004). Hawth’s analysis tools for ArcGIS. Retrieved July 5, 2005, from http://www.spatialecology.com/htools

  • Blaikie, P., Brookfield, H., & Allen, B. (1987). Land degradation and society (1st ed.). London: Methune.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, B., Grineski, S., & Collins, T. (2005). Geography of despair: Environmental racism and the making of South Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Human Ecology Review, 12(2), 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, B., Matranga, E., Hackett, E., Sadalla, E., Pijawka, D., Brewer, D., et al. (2000). Environmental equity in a Sunbelt City: The spatial distribution of toxic hazards in Phoenix, Arizona. Environmental Hazards, 2(1), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, B., Nelson, A., Hackett, E., Pijawka, K. D., Smith, C. S., Sicotte, D., et al. (2002). The ecology of technological risk in a Sunbelt city. Environment and Planning A, 34, 317–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, B., & Stanford, L. (1998). The Northridge earthquake: Vulnerability and disaster. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C. G. (2002). An assessment and explanation of environmental inequity in Baltimore. Urban Geography, 23(6), 581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. M. (2001). Environmental justice through research-based decision making. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1995). Race, class and environmental health: A review and systematization of the literature. Environmental Research, 69, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., Ciambrone, D., & Hunter, L. (1997). Does ‘green’ mask grey? Environmental equity issues at the metropolitan level. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 134, 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, S. (1985). Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, unequal exchange, and the failure of the modern state. Urbana: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzzelli, M., & Jerrett, M. (2004). Racial gradients in ambient air pollution exposure in Hamilton, Canada. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1855–1876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzzelli, M., Jerrett, M., Burnett, R., & Finklestein, N. (2003). Spatiotemporal perspectives on air pollution and environmental justice in Hamilton, Canada, 1985–1996. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(3), 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, D. V. (2007). Environmental justice and the politics of energy on the US-Mexico border. Environmental Politics, 16(3), 394–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, D. V. (2008). Popular environmentalism and social justice in Latin America. In D. V. Carruthers (Ed.), Environmental justice in Latin America: Problems, promise and practice (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: MIT Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaix, B., Gustafsson, S., Jerrett, M., Kristersson, H., Lithman, T., Boalt, A., et al. (2006). Children’s exposure to nitrogen dioxide in Sweden: Investigating environmental injustice in an egalitarian country. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(3), 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, J., & Zandbergen, P. A. (2007). Children at risk: Measuring racial/ethnic disparities in potential exposure to air pollution at school and home. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(12), 1074–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. (2008). The political ecology of hazard vulnerability: Marginalization, facilitation and the production of differential risk to urban wildfires in Arizona’s White Mountains. Journal of Political Ecology, 15, 21–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, P. (2001). The Mexican crisis and the maquiladora boom. A paradox of development or the logic of neoliberalism? Latin American Perspectives, 28(3), 55–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corliss, D. (2000). Regulating the border environment: Toxics, maquiladoras and the public right to know. In L. A. Herzog (Ed.), Shared space: Rethinking the US–Mexico border environment (pp. 295–312). San Diego: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Hodgson, M. E., & Dow, K. (2001). Subsidized inequities: The spatial patterning of environmental risks and federally assisted housing. Urban Geography, 22(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Holm, D. M., & Clark, L. (1996). The role of geographic scale in monitoring environmental justice. Risk Analysis, 16, 517–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallas Federal Reserve Bank. (2006). Maquila industry update. Retrieved 17 September, 2007, from http://www.dallasfed.org/data/data/maq-charts.pdf

  • Davis, M. (1999). The ecology of fear: Los Angeles and the imagination of disaster. New York: Metropolitan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2006). Planet of the slums. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeOliveira, O., & Roberts, B. (1996). Urban development and social inequality in Latin America. In J. Gugler (Ed.), The urban transformation of the developing world (pp. 253–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L. (2005). Single mother families and industrial pollution in metropolitan America. Sociological Spectrum, 25(6), 651–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L. (2006). Environmental racial inequality in Detroit. Social Forces, 85(2), 771–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L., & Hawkins, B. (2008). Single-mother families and air pollution: A national study. Social Science Quarterly, 89(2), 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L., & Van Willigen, M. (2005). Environmental stressors: The mental health impacts of living near industrial activity. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(3), 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA. (2006). What is the toxic release inventory. Retrieved October 8, 2006, from http://www.epa.gov/tri/whatis.htm

  • Fan, M. F. (2006). Environmental justice and nuclear waste conflicts in Taiwan. Environmental Politics, 15(3), 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. S. (2003). The transfer of core-based hazardous production processes to the export processing zones of the periphery: The Maquiladora centers of Northern Mexico. Journal of World Systems Research, IX(2), 317–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, C., & Simpson, A. (2004). Globalization at the crossroads: Ten years of NAFTA in the San Diego/Tijuana Border Region. San Diego: Environmental Health Coalition and the Colectivo Chilpancingo Pro Justicia Ambiental.

  • Goldman, B. A. (1996). What is the future of environmental justice? Antipode, 28(2), 122–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottdiener, M., & Hutchison, R. (2006). The new urban sociology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Gouldson, A. (2006). Do firms adopt lower standards in poorer areas? Corporate social responsibility and environmental justice in the EU and the US. Area, 38(4), 402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grineski, S. (2007). Incorporating health outcomes into environmental justice research: The case of children’s asthma and air pollution in Phoenix, Arizona. Environmental Hazards, 7(4), 360–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grineski, S., Bolin, B., & Boone, C. G. (2007). Criteria air pollution and marginalized populations. Social Science Quarterly, 88(2), 535–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guhathakurta, S., & Wichert, M. (1998). Who pays for growth in the city of Phoenix: An equity-based perspective on suburbanization. Urban Affairs Review, 33, 813–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, J. (2007). Environmental issues at the US–Mexico border and the unequal territorialization of value. In A. Hornberg, J. R. McNeill, & J. Martinez-Alier (Eds.), Rethinking environmental history: World-stems history and global environmental change (pp. 327–241). New York: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynen, N., Perkins, H., & Roy, P. (2006). The political ecology of uneven green space. Urban Affairs Review, 42, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D., Ong, P., Wu, J., & Winer, A. (2006). Proximity of licensed child care facilities to near-roadway vehicle pollution. American Journal of Public Health, 96(9), 1611–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L. (2000). The spatial association between US immigrant residential concentration and environmental hazards. International Migration Review, 34(2), 460–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, A. (1995). Environmental inequalities: Class, race, and industrial pollution in Gary, Indiana, 1945–1980. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerrett, M., Burnett, R. T., Kanaroglou, P., & Brook, J. R. (2001). A GIS-environmental justice analysis of particulate air pollution in Hamilton, Canada. Environment and Planning A, 33, 955–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingham, S., Pearce, J., & Zawar-Reza, P. (2007). Driven to injustice? Environmental justice and vehicle pollution in Christchurch, New Zealand. Transportation Research Part D—Transport and Environment, 12(4), 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2007, November 19). Rapture rescue 911: Disaster response for the chosen. The Nation, 285(16), 14.

  • Leikauf, G. D., Kline, S., Albert, R. E., Baxter, C. S., Bernstein, D. I., Bernstein, J., et al. (1995). Evaluation of a possible association of urban air toxics and asthma. Environmental Health Perspectives, 103(Suppl 6), 253–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverman, D. M., Varady, R. G., Chavez, O., & Sanchez, R. (1999). Environmental issues along the United States–Mexico border: Drivers of change and responses of citizens and institutions. Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 24, 607–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liverman, D. M., & Vilas, S. (2006). Neoliberalism and the environment in Latin America. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 327–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maantay, J. (2007). Asthma and air pollution in the Bronx: Methodological and data considerations in using GIS for environmental justice and health research. Health & Place, 13(1), 32–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, R. B., Leitner, H., & Sheppard, E. (1997). GIS-based environmental equity and risk assessment: Methodological problems and prospects. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 24(3), 172–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennis, J. L. (2005). The distribution and enforcement of air polluting facilities in New Jersey. Professional Geographer, 57(3), 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennis, J. L., & Jordan, L. (2005). The distribution of environmental equity: Exploring spatial nonstationarity in multivariate models of air toxic releases. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meservy, D., Suruda, A. J., Bloswick, D., Lee, J., & Dumas, M. (1997). Ergonomic risk exposure and upper-extremity cumulative trauma disorders in a maquiladora medical devices manufacturing plant. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 39(8), 767–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G., & Dorling, D. (2003). An environmental justice analysis of British air quality. Environment and Planning A, 35(5), 909–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohai, P., & Saha, R. (2006). Reassessing racial and socioeconomic disparities in environmental justice research. Demography, 43(2), 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoureEraso, R., Wilcox, M., Punnett, L., MacDonald, L., & Levenstein, C. (1997). Back to the future: Sweatshop conditions on the Mexico–US border. 2. Occupational health impact of maquiladora industrial activity. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 31(5), 587–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, M., Morello-Frosch, R., & Sadd, J. L. (2005). The air is always cleaner on the other side: Race, space, and ambient air toxics exposures in California. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(2), 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, M., Morello-Frosch, R., & Sadd, J. L. (2006). Breathless: Schools, air toxics, and environmental justice in California. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 337–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, M., Sadd, J. L., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2002). Who’s minding the kids? Pollution, public schools, and environmental justice in Los Angeles. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, M., Sadd, J. L., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2004a). Reading, writing, and toxics: Children’s health, academic performance, and environmental justice in Los Angeles. Environment and Planning C, 22, 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, M., Sadd, J. L., & Morello-Frosch, R. A. (2004b). Waiting to inhale: The demographics of toxic air releases in 21st century California. Social Science Quarterly, 85(2), 420–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J., Kingham, S., & Zawar-Reza, P. (2006). Every breath you take? Environmental justice and air pollution in Christchurch, New Zealand. Environment and Planning A, 38(5), 919–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D. N. (2007). Resisting global toxics: Transnational movements for environmental justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña, D. (1997). The terror of the machine: Technology, work, gender, and ecology on the U.S.–Mexico border. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzoli, K. (1995). Mexico’s urban housing environments: Economic and ecological challenges of the 1990s. In B. C. Aldrich & R. S. Sandhu (Eds.), Housing the urban poor: Policy and practice in developing countries (pp. 140–165). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulido, L. (2000). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(1), 12–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintero, C., & Romo, L. (2001). Riesgos laborales en la maquiladora. La experiencia tamaulipeca. Revista Frontera Norte, 13(2), 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P. (2004). Political ecology: A critical introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. T., & Thanos, N. D. (2003). Trouble in paradise. Globalization and environmental crises in Latin America. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue, C. (1993). Home with a view: Chaparral fire hazard and the social geographies of risk and vulnerability. The California Geographer, 33, 29–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R. A. (1987). El problema de los desechos tóxicos industriales. Revista El Cotidiano, 1, 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R. A. (1990). Health and environmental risks of the Maquiladora in Mexicali. Natural Resources Journal, 130, 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicotte, D., & Swanson, S. (2007). Whose risk in Philadelphia? Proximity to unequally hazardous facilities. Social Science Quarterly, 88(2), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susman, P., O’Keefe, P., & Wisner, B. (1983). Global disasters, a radical interpretation. In K. Hewitt (Ed.), Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology (pp. 263–283). Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, A., & Meuser, M. (1997). Environmental inequalities: Literature review and proposals for new directions in research and theory. Current Sociology, 5(3), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taquino, M., Parisi, D., & Gill, D. A. (2002). Units of analysis and the environmental justice hypothesis: The case of industrial hog farms. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 298–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2003). The challenge of slums: Global report on human settlements. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widener, P. (2007). Benefits and burdens of transnational campaigns: A comparison of four oil struggles in Ecuador. Mobilization, 12(1), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. M., & Homedes, N. (2001). The impact of the Maquiladoras on health and health policy along the US–Mexico border. Journal of Public Health Policy, 22(3), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G., & Mawdsley, E. (2006). Postcolonial environmental justice: Government and governance in India. Geoforum, 37(5), 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeisel, K., Paredes, N., & Brunelle, D. (2006). The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA): Effects on human rights. Retrieved 10 July, 2008, from http://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/Mexique448-ang2006.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Regional Geo-Spatial Service Center housed at the University of Texas at El Paso for funding this project. We also acknowledge Dr. Diane Sicotte at Drexel University and Dr. Jayajit Chakraborty at University of South Florida for their assistance in dealing with the spatial autocorrelation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara E. Grineski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grineski, S.E., Collins, T.W. Exploring patterns of environmental injustice in the Global South: Maquiladoras in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. Popul Environ 29, 247–270 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-008-0071-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-008-0071-z

Keywords

Navigation