Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Why are women more likely than men to extend paid work? The impact of work–family life history

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
European Journal of Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extending working life beyond the state pension age is a key European Union policy. In the UK, women are more likely to extend paid work than men, indicating that factors other than the state pension age play a role in working longer. Women are less able to build pension income due to their role as carer within the family. It, therefore, follows that gender inequalities over the life course continue into older age to influence need, capacity and desire to undertake paid work after state pension age. This paper explores how work, marital and fertility history impact upon the likelihood of extending employment. It uses the British Household Panel Survey’s retrospective data from the first 14 waves to summarise work–family histories, and logistic regression to understand the impact of work and family histories on extending paid work. Findings show that, on the one hand, women are extending paid work for financial reasons to make up for ‘opportunity costs’ as a result of their caring role within the family, with short breaks due to caring, lengthy marriages, divorcing and remaining single with children all being important. Yet, there is also evidence of ‘status maintenance’ from working life, with the women most likely to extend paid work, also those with the highest work orientation, prior to state pension age. But lengthy dis-attachment (due to caring) from the labour market makes extending working life more difficult. This has implications for policy strategies to entice women into paid work to make up for low independent financial resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the UK, state pension age is 60 for women and 65 for men.

  2. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken using household income data. Generally, the results did not change when household income was used but the sample size was reduced.

  3. Exploratory analysis was undertaken using different definitions, namely extending working life for a full year after state pension age and extending working life for a total of a year (but not necessarily in succession). But there were no large differences in the results, and these more limited definitions produced smaller cells numbers, which would make analysis of sub groups difficult.

  4. Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) worked by reducing the number of qualifying years you needed for a full basic State Pension. For most of the women in our sample, the home responsibilities protection allowance introduced in 1978 would have been introduced too late to make a significant difference.

  5. An alternative explanation could be that married women work longer to retire with their partners (since entitlement to derived pension rights only begins once husbands are retired). But this analysis has controlled for whether a partner is employed or not, and this variable makes little difference to the odds ratio.

  6. Although there were differences found between those returning to full-time and part-time work, both groups were in a relatively advantageous position in the labour market.

References

  • Arber S, Ginn J (1991) Gender and later life: a sociological analysis of resources and constraints. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardasi E, Jenkins SP (2002) Income in later life: work history matters. The Policy Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes H, Parry H (2003) Renegotiating identity and relationships: men and women’s adjustment to retirement. Policy Studies Institute (PSI) research discussion paper, vol 14. PSI, London

  • Barnes H, Parry J, Taylor R (2004) Working after state pension age: qualitative research. Department for Work and Pensions research report, vol 208. Department of Work and Pensions, London

  • Brown R (1998) Retirement: a multiphased transition, conference paper presented at the retirement need framework symposium. http://www.soa.org/news-and-publications/publications/other-publications/monographs/m-rs00-1-toc.aspx. Accessed 18 June 2013

  • Dannefer D (2003) Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. J Gerontol 58B(6):S327–S337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2005) Women and pensions: the evidence. Department for Work and Pensions, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Evandrou M, Glaser K (2003) Combining work and family life: the pension penalty of caring. Ageing Soc 23:583–601. doi:10.1017/S0144686X03001314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginn J (2003) Gender, pensions and the life course. How pensions need to adapt to changing family forms. Policy Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginn J, Street D, Arber S (2001) Women, work and pensions: international issues and prospects. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin B (1997) Unified BHPS work-life histories: combining multiple sources into a user-friendly format. Technical Paper 13, ESRC Research Centre on Micro-social Change, University of Essex

  • Halpin B (2000) BHPS work-life history files, version 2. Mimeo, ISER, University of Essex, Colchester. Available online at UKDA (documentation for study 3954)

  • Hank K (2004) Effects of early life family events on women’s late life labour market behaviour: an analysis of the relation between childbearing and retirement in Western German. Working paper

  • Hardy MA (1991) Employment after retirement: who gets back in? Res Aging 13(3):267–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward MD, Hardy MA, Liu M (1994) Work After retirement: the experiences of older men in The United States. Soc Sci Res 23:82–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henretta JC, O’Rand A, Chan CG (1993) Joint role investments and synchronization of retirement: a sequential approach to couple’s retirement timing. Soc Forces 71(4):981–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks S, Thomas J (2009) Presentation of the gender pay gap. ONS position paper. Office for National Statistics, London

  • HM Government (Directgov) (2013) https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/reviewing-the-state-pension-age. Accessed 7 July 2013

  • Humphrey A, Costigan P, Pickering K, Stratford N, Barnes M (2003) Factors affecting the labour market participation of older workers. Research report no. 200. Department for Work and Pensions, London

  • Loretto W, Vickerstaff S (2013) The domestic and gendered context for retirement in Hum. Relations 66:65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald L (1996) Transitions into retirement: a time for retirement final report. Human Resources Development, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald L (1997) The link between social research and social policy options: reverse retirement as a case in point. Public Policy 23(special joint issue, aging):90–113

  • McDonald L, Donahue P (2011) Retirement lost. Canad J Aging 30(3):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand AM (1996) The precious and the precocious: understanding cumulative disadvantage and cumulative advantage over the life course. The Gerontologist 36:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand AM, Henretta J (1999) Age and inequality: diverse pathways through later life. Westview, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rand AM, Henretta JC, Krecker ML (1992) Family pathways to retirement. In: Szinovacz M, Ekerdt DJ, Vinick BH (eds) Families and retirement. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 81–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics (2011) Pension trends: the labour market and retirement, Chap. 4. Office for National Statistics, London

  • Phillipson C, Smith A (2005) Extending working life: a review of the research literature, department for work and pensions. Research report no. 299. Corporate Document Services, Leeds

  • Pienta A (1999) Early childbearing patterns and women’s labour force behaviour in later life. J Women Aging 11(1):69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pienta A, Burr J, Mitchler J (1994) Women’s labor force participation in later life: the effects of early work and family experiences. J Gerontol Soc Sci 49(5):S231–S239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price D, Ginn J (2003) Sharing the crust? Gender, partnership status and inequalities in pension accumulation. In Arber S, Davidson K, Ginn J (eds) Gender and ageing: changing roles and relationships, Chap. 9. Open University Press, Buckingham

  • Rake K (2007) Women’s incomes over the lifetime: a report to the women’s unit. The Stationery Office, Pronzato, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymo J, Warren J, Sweeney M, Hauser R, Ho J (2010) Later-life employment preferences and outcomes: the role of midlife work experiences. Res Aging 32:419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury R, Finch N, Corden A (2006) Self-employment and retirement, department for work and pensions research repor****t, vol 395. Corporate Document Services, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  • Sefton T (2011) Evandrou, M and Falkingham, J (2011) Family Ties: Women’s Work and Family Histories and their Association with Incomes in Later Life in the UK. J Soc Policy 40(1):41–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sefton T, Evandrou M, Falkingham J (2008) Women’s Work and Family Histories and their Association with Incomes in Later Life in the UK, CASE Paper 135. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE), London School of Economics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeaton D, McKay S (2003) Working after state pension age: quantitative analysis. DWP research report no. 182

  • Yabiku ST (2000) Family history and pensions: The relationships between marriage, divorce, children, and private pension coverage. J of Aging Studies. 14:293–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Finch.

Additional information

Communicated by H. Litwin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finch, N. Why are women more likely than men to extend paid work? The impact of work–family life history. Eur J Ageing 11, 31–39 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-013-0290-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-013-0290-8

Keywords

Navigation