Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problem definition is a package of ideas that includes, at least implicitly, an account of the causes and consequences of undesirable circumstances and a theory about how to improve them. As such, it serves as the overture to policymaking, as an integral part of the process of policymaking, and as a policy outcome. In each of these roles it seems to exert influence on government action. Distinguishing among the roles clarifies the nature of that influence. A case study examines the transition from one problem definition to another in the domain of information collection by the federal government. The rise of the Paperwork Reduction definition illustrates the variety of ways in which problem definition has powerful consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, W. Lance, P. D. Harris, J. K. Laskey, A. H. Levitch, and S. E. Monrad (1976) ‘ Deep and surface images in the construction of political issues, ’ Quarterly Journal of Speech, April: 109–126.

  • Brewer, Garry and Peter deLeon (1983) The Foundations of Policy Analysis. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Jimmy (1977) Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, February. Reprinted in Statistical Reporter, April: 287–288.

  • Caudle, Sharon L. (1988), ‘Federal information resources management after the Paperwork Reduction Act,’ Public Administration Review 48: 790–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Richard E. (1976) ‘Big government' emerges as big issue in ‘76 election campaign,’ National Journal, March 6: 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Federal Paperwork (1976) ‘ Bits and pieces of the paperwork problem.’ Unpublished memorandum.

  • Commission on Federal Paperwork (1977a) History of Paperwork Reform Efforts: A Report of the Commission on Federal Paperwork. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Federal Paperwork (1977b) Final Summary Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Federal Paperwork (1977c) Information Value/Burden Assessment. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Government Operations (1976) U.S. Senate. Subcommittee on Oversight Procedures. Hearings on Paperwork Review and Limitation Act of 1976. May: 131–132.

  • Committee on Government Operations (1980) U.S. House of Representatives. Hearings on Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, February 7, 21, 26. Statement of Wayne Granquist, Associate Director for Management and Regulatory Policy, OMB, p. 91.

  • Derthick, Martha (1979), Policymaking for Social Security. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derthick, Martha and Quirk, Paul (1985), The Politics of Deregulation. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dery, David (1984) Problem Definition in Policy Analysis. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domestic Council, Executive Office of the President (1975) White House Public Forums on Domestic Policy 1975: Report to the President. Gerald Ford Presidential Library.

  • Downs, Anthony (1972) ‘ Up and down with ecology: The issue-attention cycle,’ The Public Interest, Summer: 38–50.

  • Duncan, Joseph W. (1975) ‘ Seeking reductions in the federal paperwork burden, ’ Statistical Reporter, July: 2.

  • Edelman, Murray (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Paul (1970) ‘ Commissions on statistics; Statistics on commissions,’ Statistical Reporter. November: 73–79.

  • Ford, Gerald (1975a) Presidential Greeting for First Meeting of Commission on Federal Paperwork. July 23. Gerald R. Ford Library.

  • Ford, Gerald (1975b) Address to National Federation of Independent Business. June 17. Gerald R. Ford Library.

  • Ford, Gerald (1975c) Address to Annual Convention of U.S. Chamber of Commerce. April 28. Gerald R. Ford Library.

  • Ford, Gerald (1976a) Statement by the President on Progress Toward Reducing the Number of Federal Reports, July 23. Reprinted in Statistical Reporter, August: 277–278.

  • Ford, Gerald (1976b) Memorandum to the Heads of Executive Departments and Establishments Regarding Reporting Burden Reduction Program. Reprinted in Statistical Reporter, October: 20–24.

  • Ford, Gerald R. (1979) A Time to Heal. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, Charles and Roger Cobb (1983) The Political Uses of Symbols. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. and Andre Modigliani (1987) ‘The changing culture of affirmative action,’ in R. Braungart (ed.), Research in Political Sociology, Volume 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office (1984) ‘ The Office of Management and Budget's Actions Show Progress in Implementing the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, ’ IMTEC 84-24, September 7.

  • Gusfield, Joseph P. (1981) The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, Hugh (1978) ‘Issue networks and the executive establishment,’ in: A. King (ed.), The New American Political System. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, Hugh (1986) ‘Reaganism and the Search for a Public Philosophy,’ in: J Palmer (ed.), Perspectives on the Reagan Years. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, Philip B. (1987) The Politics of Public Management. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Thomas D. (1986) ‘Social Policy and the Regulatory Process,’ Working paper 9, Project on the Federal Social Role, National Conference on Social Welfare.

  • Huntington, Samuel (1981) American Politics: the Promise of Disharmony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzmann, Robert A. (1986) Institutional Disability: The Saga of Transportation Policy for the Disabled. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Herbert (1977) Red Tape. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown, p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance, Bert (1977) Memorandum to the Heads of Executive Departments and Establishments: Subject President's Reporting Burden Reduction Program, February. Reprinted in Statistical Reporter, April: 288–291.

  • Light Paul C (1982) The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Carter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustadt, Richard M (dy1981) ‘Taming the paperwork tiger,’ Regulation, January–February: 28–32.

  • Oaxaca, Fernando (1976) ‘ President's Reporting Reduction Program ’ Statistical Reporter, April: 185–188.

  • Office of Management and Budget (1976) Circular A-40, Attachment A, revised February 10, p.5.

  • Office of Management and Budget (1978) Paperwork and Red Tape: New Perspectives, New Directions. A Report to the President and Congress. June: 28–33.

  • Office of Management and Budget (1979) Paperwork and Red Tape. A Report to the President and the Congress. September.

  • Office of Management and Budget (1981) Information Collection Budget for FY 1981. January.

  • Office of Management and Budget (1984) Information Collection Budget for FY 1984. January.

  • Office of Management and Budget (1985) Information Collection Budget for FY 1985. April.

  • ‘ Office of Statistical Standards, ’ (1952) Statistical Reporter, November.

  • Quade, E. S. (1975) Analysis for Public Decisions. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A. (1988), ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein,’ Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senate Report 96-930 (1980) Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980: Report to Accompany S 1411. Committee on Governmental Affairs, Subcommittee on Federal Spending Practices and Open Government. September 8.

  • Sundquist, James (1976) ‘Congress and the president: Enemies or partners?’ in H. Owen and C. Schultze (eds.), Setting National Priorities: The Next Ten Years. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Janet A. and Judith Gruber (1984) ‘ Using knowledge for control in fragmented policy arenas, ’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Winter: 225–247.

  • White House Press Office (1976) Transcript of Meeting of President Ford and Members of the Regulatory Agencies and Administration Officials. April 8. Gerald R. Ford Library.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Public Policy Studies, University of Michigan, 48109-1220, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.

    Janet A. Weiss

Authors
  1. Janet A. Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiss, J.A. The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork. Policy Sci 22, 97–121 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141381

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141381

Keywords

Search

Navigation