Skip to main content
Log in

An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been a great deal of research in recent years concerning the use of substantive policy analysis in public policy-making. This paper seeks to integrate those findings - e.g., the ‘enlightenment function’ of policy research - into a more general model of policy-making over periods of a decade or more. The conceptual framework focuses on the belief systems of advocacy coalitions within policy subsystems as the critical vehicle for understanding the role of policy analysis in policy-oriented learning and the effect, in turn, of such learning on changes in governmental programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, Robert et al. (1968). Theories of Cognitive Consistency. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, Bruce and Hassler, William (1981). Clean Coal Dirty Air. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, Icek and Fishbein, Martin (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton, Thomas (1980). Administered Politics. Boston: Martinas Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, Chris and Schon, Donald (1978). Organizational Learning. N.Y.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, Douglas (1981). Policy and Politics in Britain. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert, ed. (1976). Structure of Decision. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbus, Isaac (1971). The Concept of Interest in Pluralist and Marxian Analysis, Politics and Society 1 (Feb.) 151–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel (1960). The End of Ideology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Paul (1978). ‘Macro- and Micro-Implementation,’ Public Policy 26 (Spring): 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Marver (1955). Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Jeffrey (1977). Lobbying for the People. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, Janice and Trice, Harrison (1982). ‘The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings’, Administrative Science Quarterly 27 (December): 591–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boffey, Philip (1975). The Brain Bank of America. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Garry (1973). Politicians, Bureaucrats, and the Consultant. N.Y.: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Garry (1974). ‘The Policy Sciences Emerge,’ Policy Science 15 (Sept.): 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Garry and de Leon, Peter (1983). Foundations of Policy Analysis. Homewood: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Anthony (1987). The Politics of Airline Deregulation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Eric (1970). Coalition Theories. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, Eric and Dreijamis, John, eds. (1982). Government Coalitions in Western Democracies. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, Martin (1980). Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Walter Dean (1970). Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, Frederick and Flinn, William (1978). ‘The Politics of Environmental Concern,’ Environment and Behavior 10 (March): 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, James (1978). ‘Ideology and Policy Termination: Restructuring California's Mental Health System,’ in The Policy Cycle, ed. Judith May and Aaron Wildavsky (Beverly Hills: Sage), pp. 301–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald (1977). ‘Reforms as Experiments,’ Readings in Evaluation Research, ed. by Francis Caro (N.Y.: Russell Sage), pp. 172–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Nathan et al. (1975). The Use of Social Science Knowledge in Policy Decisions at the National Level. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, Roger (1973). ‘The Belief Systems Perspective.’ Journal of Politics 35 (Feb.): 121–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J. and Feldman, Stanley (1984). ‘How People Organize the Political World: A Schematic Model,’ American Journal of Political Science 28 (February): 95–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Phillip (1964). ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,’ in Ideology and Discontent, ed. David Apter. N.Y.: Free Press, pp. 206–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Brian J. (1988). Bureaucratic Politics and Regulatory Reform: The EPA and Emissions Trading. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert (1971). Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. Clarence (1970). The Politics of Pollution. N.Y.: Pegasus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Charles and Davis, Sandra (1988). ‘Analyzing Change in Public Lands Policymaking: From Subsystems to Advocacy Coalitions’, Policy Studies Journal (forthcoming).

  • de Haven-Smith, Lance and C. Van Horn (1984). ‘Subgovernment Conflict in Public Policy’, Policy Studies Journal 12 (June): 627–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swann, Abram (1973). Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derthick, Martha (1979). Policymaking for Social Security. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derthick, Martha and Quirk, Paul (1985). The Politics of Deregulation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, Lawrence (1976). Coalitions in Parliamentary Governments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, Lawrence and Schott, Richard (1979). Congress and the Administrative State. N.Y.: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doggan, Mattei (1975). The Mandarins of Western Europe. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, Paul (1984). Environmental Economics and Policy. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, Michael (1981). The Politics of Mass Housing in Britain, 1945–75. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, William (1980). ‘The Two-Communities Metaphor and Models of Knowledge Use,’ Knowledge 1 (June): 515–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, William (1982). ‘The Theory of Exceptional Clinicians,’ Paper presented at the Conference on the Production of Useful Knowledge, University of Pittsburgh, Oct. 28–30, 1982.

  • Easton, David (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. N.Y: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, Richard (1979). ‘Backward Mapping,’ Political Science Quarterly 94 (Winter): 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etheredge, Lloyd (1981). ‘Political Learning,’ in Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. by S. Long. N.Y: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etheredge, Lloyd (1985). Can Governments Learn? Amercan Foreign Policy and Central American Relations. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, Suzanne (1971). Urban Lobbying. New York: New York Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, Leon (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan and Taylor, Shelley (1984). Social Cognition. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, Henry (1975). Community Mental Health Legislation. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Mark and Mackie, Thomas (1984). ‘Reassessing the Importance of Size and Ideology for the Formation of Governing Coalitions in Parliamentary Democracies,’ American Journal of Political Science 28 (November): 671–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, P. E. and Freedman, Anne (1981). ‘Political Learning,’ in The Handbook of Political Behavior ed. Samuel Long. New York: Plenum, pp. 255–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritschler, A. Lee (1975). Smoking and Politics, 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Alexander (1969). ‘The Operational Code,’ International Studies Quarterly 13 (June): 110–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Leonard and Moen, Phyllis (1981). ‘The Evolution and Implementation of Federal Welfare Policy,’ in Effective Policy Implementation, ed. D. Mazmanian and P. Sabatier. (Lexington: Heath), pp. 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormley, William (1986). ‘Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System’, Polity (Summer): 595–620.

  • Greenberger, Martin et al. (1983). Caught Unawares. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, Anthony and Ronis, David (1978). ‘Twenty Years of Cognitive Dissonance: Case Study of the Evolution of a Theory,’ Psychological Review 85 (No. 1): 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, Ernest (1961). Congress: Its Contemporary Role, 3d ed., N.Y.: New York Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagevik, George (1970). Decision-Making in Air Pollution Control. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, Keith (1983). ‘Patterns of Influence among Committees, Agencies and Interest Groups,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 8 (August): 379–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Norwood (1969). Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Jeffrey (1976). ‘Comparative Cognition: Politics of International Control of the Oceans,’ in Structure of Decision, ed. R. Axelrod. Princeton: Princeton University Press, Chap. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, Hugh (1974). Social Policy in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, Hugh (1978). ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment,’ in The New American Political System, ed. A. King. Washington: AEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Douglas and Fassbender, H., eds. (1981). Contemporary Political Economy. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinckley, Barbara (1981). Coalitions and Polities. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjern, Benny and Porter, David (1981). ‘Implementation Structures,’ Organization Studies 2: 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferbert, Richard (1974). The Study of Public Policy. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, Brian and Peters, B. Guy (1983). Policy Dynamics. N.Y.: St. Martins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inan, Michele (1979). ‘Savior of the Cities — Would You Believe, Howard Jarvis?’ California Journal 10 (April): 138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, Helen (1977). ‘Policy Implementation through Bargaining: Federal Grants in Aid,’ Public Story 25 (Fall):

  • Ingram, Helen (1978). ‘The Political Rationality of Innovation: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970,’ in Approaches to Controlling Air Pollution, ed. by Ann Friedlaender. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 12–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, J. M. (1978). ‘Selective Exposure as a Function of Dogmatism and Incentive,’ Journal of Social Psychology 106: 261–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, Irving (1983). Groupthink, 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank (1985). ‘Adversarial Analysis in the Bureaucratic Context,’ in Advocacy Analysis, ed. Peter Brown. Baltimore: University of Maryland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank and Sabatier, Paul (1987). ‘The Use of Content Analysis to Examine Changes in Elite Beliefs and Public Policy over Time’, Paper submitted to the American Journal of Political Science.

  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank and St. Clair, Gilbert (1988). ‘Analysis of Change in Elite Policy Beliefs within Subsystems.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Assn., San Francisco.

  • Jordan, A. G. and Richardson, J. J. (1983). ‘Policy Communities: The British and European Style,’ Policy Studies Journal 11 (June): 603–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul and Tversky, Amos (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, Edward (1958). ‘The Horse Calvary in the Twentieth Century,’ Public Policy 8: 120–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Herbert (1971). The Limits of Organizational Change. University, Ala.: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirst, Michael and Jung, Richard (1982).The Utility of a Longitudinal Approach in Assessing Implementation: Title I, ESEA,’ in Studying Implementation, by Walter Williams. Chatham, N. J.: Chatham House, pp. 119–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiser, Larry and Ostrom, Elinor (1982). ‘The Three Worlds of Action,’ in Strategies of Political Inquiry, ed. E. Ostrom. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 179–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneese, Allen and Bower, Blair (1968). Water Quality Management. Baltimore: John Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoepfel, Peter and Wiedner, Helmut (1982). ‘A Conceptual Framework for Studying Implementation,’ in The Implementation of Pollution Control Programs, ed. by Paul Downing and Kenneth Hanf. Tallahassee: Policy Sciences Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnow, Erwin, Lawrence Longley, and Herbert Terry (1982). The Politics of Broadcast Regulation, 3rd. ed. N.Y.: St. Martin's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krier, James and Ursin, Edmund (1977). Pollution and Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre (1971). ‘History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction,’ Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8: 42–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, James and Hamilton, Michael (1987). ‘Intergovernmental Relations and Marine Policy Change,’ in Ocean Resources and U.S. Intergovernmental Relations in the 1980s, ed. by Maynard Silva. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles and Cohen, David (1979). Usable Knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liroff, Richard (1986). Reforming Air Pollution Regulation: The Toil and Trouble of EPA's Bubble. Washington, D.C.: Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico (1980). ‘Policies as Theories,’ Omega 8:151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James and Simon, Herbert (1958). Organizations. N.Y.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Howard (1974). Technical Advice on Policy Issues, Sage Professional Paper on Administrative and Policy Studies (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmor, Theodore (1970). The Politics of Medicare. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, Daniel and Nienaber, Jeanne (1979). Can Organizations Change? Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, Daniel and Sabatier, Paul, eds. (1981). Effective Policy Implementation. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, Daniel and Sabatier, Paul (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Chicago: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, Allan (1981). The Dynamics of Technical Controversy. Washington, D.C.: Communication Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, William (1968). ‘Theory of the Structure of Human Thought,’ in Theories of Cognitive Consistency ed. R. Abelson et al., Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 148–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, John (1971). Encounters with the Archdruid. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, Kenneth (1987). Politics and the Bureaucracy, 2d ed. Monterey, CA.: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltsner, Arnold (1976). Policy Analysts in the Bureaucrcy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, H. Brinton and Wamsley, Gary (1984). ‘Policy Subsystems, Networks, and the Tools of Public Management,’ Public Policy Formation and Implementation, ed. by Robert Eyestone. N.Y.: JAI Press, Chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, Mark (1971). The Politics of Consumer Protection. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, Dorothy (1979). Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Robert (1987). ‘The Economics Profession and the Making of Public Policy,’ Journal of Economic Literature 25 (March): 42–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, Allen and Simon, Herbert (1972).Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, Richard and Ross, Lee (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, Arthur (1975). Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor (1982). ‘Institutional Arrangements and Learning,’ Paper delivered at the ZIF, University of Bielefeld, 20 July.

  • Ostrom, Elinor (1986). ‘Institutional Arrangements for Managing the Commons Dilemma,’ in Bonnie McCay and Janis Acheson, eds., Capturing the Commons. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Vincent (1982). ‘European Public Administration,’ Paper presented at the European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

  • Ostrom, Vincent, Tiebout, Charles, and Warren, Robert (1961). ‘The Organization of Government in Mertropolitan Areas,’ American Pol. Sci. Review 55 (Dec.): 831–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffley, Mark and Hurwitz, Jon (1985). ‘A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint,’ American Journal of Political Science 29 (November): 871–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, Richard and Cacioppo, John (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Roy and Rochon, Thomas (1984). ‘Attitudinal Change and Elite Conversion: French Socialist Candidates in 1967 and 1978,’ American Journal of Political Science 28 (May): 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premfors, Rune (1983). ‘Governmental Commissions in Sweden,’ American Behavioral Scientist 26 (May/June): 623–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, Jeffrey and Wildavsky, Aaron (1973). Implementation. Berkely: Univ. of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, Joel and Von Hippel, Frank (1974). Advice and Dissent. N.Y.: New American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert (1973). The Beliefs of Politicians. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert (1976). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, Paul (1981). Industry Influence in Federal Regulatory Agencies. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajecki, D. W. (1982). Attitudes: Themes and Advances. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, Martin and White, Seldon (1977). ‘Policy Research: Belief and Doubt,’ Policy Analysis 3 (Spring): 239–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Robert ed. (1981). The Knowledge Cycle. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, Randall and Franklin, Grace (1982). Bureaucracy and Policy Implementation. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John B. (1982). ‘Apples and Horned Toads: On the Framework-Determined Nature of the Energy Debate.’ Policy Sciences 15: 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, Milton (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, Stein (1970). Citizens, Elections, and Parties. Oslo: Universitaetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul (1975). ‘Social Movements and Regulatory Agencies’ Political Science 6 (Sept.): 301–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul (1978). ‘The Acquisition and Utilization of Technical Information by Administrative Agencies.’ Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (Sept.): 386–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul (1986). ‘Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Policy Implementation: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis,’ Journal of Public Policy 6 (January): 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul and Hunter, Susan (1988). ‘The Incorporation of Causal Perceptions into Models of Elite Belief Systems’, Paper submitted to the Western Political Quarterly.

  • Sabatier, Paul and Pelkey, Neil (1987). ‘Incorporating Multiple Actors and Guidance Instruments into Models of Regulatory Policy-Making: An Advocacy Coalition Framework,’ Administration and Society 19 (Sept.): 236–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul, Susan Hunter, and Susan McLaughlin (1987). ‘The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents.’ Western Political Quarterly 41 (Sept.): 449–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz (1982). ‘The Political Economy of Inflation and Unemployment in Western Europe: An Outline,’ Discussion Paper 81–21 (Berlin: International Institute of Management).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, Ashley (1962). Fire and Water: Scientific Heresy in the Forest Service. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, Charles (1977). The Public Use of Private Interest. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, L. J. (1984). ‘National and Subnational Government and Coordination,’ in Guidance, Control and Evaluation in the Public Sector, ed. F. X. Kaufmann, V. Ostrom and G. Majone (Berlin: de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert (1955). ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert (1979). Models of Thought. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Don (1968). ‘Cognitive Consistency and the Perception of Others' Opinions,’ Public Opinion Quarterly 32: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbruner, John (1974). The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Michael and Laver, Michael (1973). ‘Government Coalitions in Western Europe,’ European Journal of Political Research. 1 (September): 205–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Serge (1984). Making Bureaucracies Think. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, Abraham (1987). ‘Self-Generated Attitude Change,’ Advances in Experimental Social-Psychology 11: 289–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, David (1951). The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vig, Norman and Kraft, Michael, eds. (1984). Environmental Policy in the 1980s. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wamsley, Gary (1983). ‘Policy Subsystems as a Unit of Analysis in Implementation Studies,’ Paper presented at Erasmus University, Rotterdam, June.

  • Warwick, Paul (1979). ‘The Durability of Coalition Governments in Parliamentary Democracies,’ Comparative Political Studies 11 (January): 465–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, David (1983). ‘Obstacles to the Utilization of Systematic Policy Analysis,’ Knowledge 4 (June): 534–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Alvin (1972). ‘Science and Trans-Science,’ Minerva 10 (April): 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Carol (1977a). Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Carol (1977b). ‘Research for Policy's Sake: The Enlightment Function of Social Research,’ Policy Analysis 3 (Fall): 531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, Robert and Brehm, Jack (1976). Perspectives on Cognitive Dissonance. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron (1979). Speaking Truth to Power. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron and Tenenbaum, Ellen (1981). The Politics of Mistrust. Beverley Hills, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilker, Harry and Milbrath, Lester (1972). ‘Political Belief Systems and Political Behaviour,’ in Political Attitudes and Public Opinion, ed. D. Nimmo and C. Bonjean. N.Y.: David McKay, pp. 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James Q. (1973). Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, Bjorn (1983). ‘Planning, Pluralism, and Policy Intellectuals,’ in Researchers and Policy-Makers in Education, ed. T. Husen and M. Kogan Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zariski, Raphael (1984). ‘Coalition Formation in the Italian Regions,’ Comparative Politics 16 (July): 403–420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabatier, P.A. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 21, 129–168 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406

Keywords

Navigation