Table 2

Summary of BYM models for the association between income quintile and (A) natural space (NS) and (B) natural space and gardens (NSG)

MalesFemales
IRRLower 95% CrIUpper 95% CrIIRRLower 95% CrIUpper 95% CrI
Model A
(Intercept)1.3731.2351.5261.1801.0171.369
Income quintileQ1
Q20.7220.6280.8310.6400.5250.779
Q30.4840.4200.5580.4590.3760.560
Q40.3170.2750.3660.2530.2060.309
Q50.2040.1770.2350.1640.1340.201
Percentage NS%NS1.0000.9971.0040.9970.9931.002
Income interaction with %NSQ1: %NS
Q2: %NS0.9970.9931.0011.0010.9961.007
Q3: %NS0.9980.9941.0021.0010.9961.006
Q4: %NS0.9990.9961.0031.0051.0001.010
Q5: %NS1.0010.9971.0051.0050.9991.010
Model B
(Intercept)2.1061.6752.6481.6381.1862.261
Income quintileQ1
Q20.6080.4420.8350.4280.2730.670
Q30.3810.2810.5160.2880.1870.442
Q40.2170.1600.2950.1250.0810.193
Q50.1070.0760.1510.0850.0520.138
Percentage NSG%NSG 0.993 0.989 0.997 0.993 0.987 0.998
Income interaction with %NSGQ1: %NSG
Q2: %NSG1.0020.9961.0071.0081.0001.015*
Q3: %NSG1.0030.9991.0081.0081.0011.015
Q4: %NSG1.0061.0021.0111.0141.0071.021
Q5: %NSG1.0111.0061.0171.0131.0051.021
  • *CrI excludes 1.

  • BYM, Besag-York-Moillie; CrI, credible interval; IRR, incident rate ratio; NS, natural space; NSG, natural space and gardens.