Table 4

Adjusted trends in predicted hospital admission rates before, during and after the Safe At Home scheme in intervention and control areas

Time pointPredicted injury hospital admission rate per 100 000 per month and 95% CI*Difference in
Trends*†
Control areasIntervention areas
Baseline period
January 2004115.1 (112.5–117.7)125.3 (122.7–128.1)
March 2009118.0 (115.8–120.3)131.2 (128.7–133.6)
Change in rate per month (%)‡0.04 (−0.02–0.10)
P=0.16
0.07 (0.02–0.13)
P=0.009
0.03 (−0.05–0.11)
P=0.42
Implementation period
April 2009118.15 (116.0–120.3)131.63 (129.3–134.0)
March 2011121.01 (118.2–123.9)143.24 (140.0–146.5)
Change in rate per month (%)‡0.10 (−0.03–0.24)
P=0.14
0.37 (0.23–0.50)
P<0.001
0.26 (0.07–0.46)
P=0.007
First postintervention period
April 2011121.1 (118.4–123.8)142.8 (139.7–145.9)
March 2013122.2 (119.5–125.0)132.4 (129.5–135.4)
Change in rate per month (%)‡0.04 (−0.11–0.19)
P=0.59
−0.33 (−0.47 to −0.18)
P<0.001
−0.37 (−0.58 to −0.16)
P=0.001
Second postintervention period
April 2013122.0 (119.4–124.6)132.3 (129.5–135.1)
December 2015114.10 (110.9–117.4)127.2 (123.7–130.8)
Change in rate per month (%)‡−0.21 (−0.34 to −0.08)
P=0.002
−0.12 (−0.25–0.01)
P=0.06
0.09 (−0.09–0.27)
P=0.35
  • *Across all time points, within each time period.

  • †The difference in trends is the difference between the change in rate in intervention areas and the change in rates in the control areas.

  • ‡The change in rate per month is derived from the incidence rate ratio and reflects the percentage change in the injury rate per month.