Logistic regression model outputs based on imputed data set when comparing hazardous drinkers and harmful drinkers to lower-risk drinkers
| 24-year clinic | Prevalence (n, %) | Crude (model 1) OR (95% CI, p value) | Model 2* OR (95% CI, p value) | Model 3* OR (95% CI, p value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anxiety, GAD | ||||
| Lower-risk drinkers | 163 (11.39) | – | – | – |
| Hazardous drinkers | 133 (7.55) | 0.64 (0.50–0.80) | 0.67 (0.53–0.86) | 0.69 (0.54–0.88) |
| Harmful drinkers | 51 (13.46) | 1.20 (0.86–1.69) p<0.001 | 1.36 (0.97–1.91) p<0.001 | 1.39 (0.99–1.96) p<0.001 |
| Depression | ||||
| Low-risk drinkers | 180 (12.58) | – | – | – |
| Hazardous drinkers | 144 (8.17) | 0.62 (0.49–0.79) | 0.66 (0.52–0.84) | 0.68 (0.54–0.86) |
| Harmful drinkers | 67 (17.68) | 1.49 (1.09–2.02) p<0.001 | 1.72 (1.26–2.36) p<0.001 | 1.77 (1.29–2.43) p<0.001 |
| Fear-based anxieties | ||||
| Low-risk drinkers | 17 (1.19) | – | – | – |
| Hazardous drinkers | 11 (0.62) | 0.52 (0.24–1.12) | 0.57 (0.27–1.22) | 0.59 (0.27–1.27) |
| Harmful drinkers | 9 (2.37) | 2.02 (0.89–4.58) p=0.01 | 2.40 (1.05–5.47) p=0.006 | 2.41 (1.04–5.56) p=0.009 |
*Model 1 (crude). Model 2 adjusted for sex. Model 3 adjusted for sex, social status, income and maternal education.
**Estimates are accompanied by omnibus p values with two df to assess differences in odds across all alcohol groups.