Table 2

Prevalence ratio (95% CIs) of being of low socioeconomic status for those using health check-up services in intervention sessions (with nurse costumes) compared with control sessions (without nurse costumes)

Low socioeconomic status measured as
Having National Health InsuranceNot having job
Complete caseImputed*Complete caseImputed*
All
 Crude1.37 (0.99, 1.88)1.38 (1.00, 1.89)1.26 (1.01, 1.57)1.20 (0.98, 1.46)
 Age-adjusted1.34 (0.98, 1.83)1.36 (1.00, 1.87)1.22 (1.04, 1.43)1.16 (0.99, 1.35)
 Age, check-up history and biomarkers adjusted1.32 (1.07, 1.63)1.36 (1.00, 1.86)1.31 (1.10, 1.55)1.15 (0.99, 1.35)
Men
 Crude1.29 (0.89, 1.88)1.30 (0.90, 1.88)1.18 (0.88, 1.56)1.16 (0.90, 1.50)
 Model 1: age-adjusted1.27 (0.87, 1.86)1.30 (0.89, 1.89)1.17 (0.94, 1.47)1.14 (0.92, 1.40)
 Age, check-up history and biomarkers adjusted1.45 (1.09, 1.93)1.29 (0.89, 1.88)1.13 (0.88, 1.44)1.13 (0.92, 1.39)
Women
 Crude1.46 (1.12, 1.91)1.47 (1.13, 1.92)1.50 (1.16, 1.93)1.35 (1.07, 1.69)
 Age-adjusted1.43 (1.11, 1.84)1.45 (1.12, 1.87)1.37 (1.06, 1.76)1.27 (1.01, 1.60)
 Age, check-up history and biomarkers adjusted1.19 (0.98, 1.46)1.45 (1.12, 1.86)1.87 (1.27, 2.75)1.27 (1.01, 1.59)
  • *Prevalence ratios were calculated with Poisson regression adjusted for within-parlour clustering using parlour random effects.