Table 3

Results of longitudinal latent class analysis for total walking and walking for transport and for recreation

	Total time spent walking				Time spent walking for recreation					Time spent walking for transport
	Two classes	Three classes	Four classes	Five classes	Two classes	Three classes	Four classes	Five classes	Six classes	Two classes	Three classes	Four classes	Five classes	Six classes
Sequential model comparisons	2 v 1	3 v 2	4 v 3	5 v 4	2 v 1	3 v 2	4 v 3	5 v 4	6 v 5	2 v 1	3 v 2	4 v 3	5 v 4	6 v 5
Log likelihood values for T classes	−10931.2	−10156.5 H0 Loglikelihood Value -10156.506	−9853.1	−9675.2	−9123.4	−8858.4	−8666.8	−8570.0	−8483.6	−8906.2	−8643.5	−8453.5	−8278.2	−8163.7
−2 difference in log likelihood	1549.4	606.8	201.4	154.1	1509.30	530.03	383.06	193.52	172.98	1157.37	525.24	380.02	350.52	229.13
Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted LRT value	1496.8	586.3	194.6	148.9	1458.28	512.11	370.11	186.98	167.13	1118.21	525.24	367.161	338.67	221.38
Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted LRT p value	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.144	0.001	0.030	0.048	0.1417	0.159	0.036	0.466	0.0512	0.0476	0.420
Bootstrap LRT p value	0.001	0.001	0.010	0.153	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.001	0.472	0.001	0.001	0.001
Information criterion
AIC	20333.0	19734.1	19540.7	19394.5	18266.7	17744.7	17369.6	17184.1	17019.1	17832.3	17315.1	16943.0	16600.5	16379.4
BIC	20384.2	19805.8	19632.8	19507.2	18318.2	17816.8	17462.3	17297.3	17153.0	17883.7	17387.0	17035.6	16713.6	16513.0
Sample size adjusted BIC	20352.5	19761.3	19575.7	19437.3	18286.4	17772.3	17405.1	17227.5	17070.4	17851.9	17342.6	16978.4	16643.7	16430.4
Entropy	0.93	0.912	0.912	0.870	0.946	0.945	0.950	0.955	0.954	0.967	0.945	0.937	0.955	0.946
Smallest class size (%)	14.6	5.0	4.8	4.1	13.9	2.6	2.4	2.6	3.17	7.3	1.9	0.79	0.64	0.55

AIC, BIC difference in the number of parameters for all models is 4.
AIC, Akaike Information Criterion BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; LRT, likelihood ratio test.