Table 2

Comparison of successfully completed evaluation tasks between ECD-group (n=219) and IHIP-group (n=216) children after 1-year follow-up

Proportion indicators solvedScored above mean
Child developmental domainECD group, median (IQR)IHIP group, median (IQR)ECD group, % (n)IHIP group, % (n)RR* (95% CI)
FM60% (25–75)40% (20–60)62 (136)39 (84)1.6 (1.2 to 2.0)
RO67% (50–75)50% (33–67)62 (135)40 (86)1.5 (1.3 to 1.9)
BH66% (50–100)50% (33–67)57 (124)36 (77)1.6 (1.3 to 2.0)
PS80% (60–100)60% (40–83)60 (131)40 (86)1.5 (1.1 to 2.0)
CO60% (40–80)40% (33–60)54 (119)36 (77)1.5 (1.1 to 2.2)
ST67% (33–75)50% (25–67)66 (145)49 (106)1.3 (1.0 to 1.8)
GM67% (50–83)67% (50–83)49 (108)37 (80)1.3 (1.0 to 1.7)
  • *Relative risks, estimated by log-binomial generalised estimating equations to account for within-cluster correlation.

  • BH, basic habits; CO, communication; ECD, early child development; FM, fine motor skills; GM, gross motor skills; IHIP, integrated household intervention package; PS, personal and social development; RO, Relationship between objects; ST, space and time.