Table 2

Hypertension and diabetes according to study setting: bivariable and multivariable models using multinomial logistic regression

Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4
PR (95% CI)PR (95% CI)PR (95% CI)PR (95% CI)
Prehypertension (vs normal)
 Lima1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)
 Urban Puno0.68 (0.56 to 0.84)0.64 (0.52 to 0.79)0.64 (0.52 to 0.79)0.64 (0.52 to 0.79)
 Rural Puno1.20 (1.03 to 1.40)1.20 (1.01 to 1.43)1.22 (1.02 to 1.45)1.28 (1.07 to 1.53)
 Tumbes1.21 (1.05 to 1.39)1.24 (1.07 to 1.42)1.19 (1.03 to 1.38)1.18 (1.02 to 1.36)
Hypertension (vs normal)
 Lima1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)
 Urban Puno0.63 (0.50 to 0.80)0.59 (0.47 to 0.75)0.61 (0.48 to 0.77)0.57 (0.44 to 0.73)
 Rural Puno0.68 (0.54 to 0.86)0.68 (0.53 to 0.88)0.73 (0.56 to 0.94)0.81 (0.62 to 1.04)
 Tumbes1.38 (1.19 to 1.60)1.36 (1.18 to 1.57)1.24 (1.08 to 1.43)1.30 (1.12 to 1.50)
Prediabetes (vs normal)
 Lima1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)
 Urban Puno0.81 (0.65 to 1.02)0.76 (0.60 to 0.98)0.77 (0.61 to 0.99)0.80 (0.63 to 1.01)
 Rural Puno0.46 (0.34 to 0.61)0.58 (0.42 to 0.79)0.58 (0.42 to 0.80)0.66 (0.49 to 0.91)
 Tumbes1.26 (1.07 to 1.48)1.39 (1.18 to 1.64)1.38 (1.16 to 1.63)1.36 (1.16 to 1.61)
Type 2 diabetes (vs normal)
 Lima1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)1 (Reference)
 Urban Puno1.25 (0.85 to 1.84)1.34 (0.88 to 2.05)1.42 (0.94 to 2.14)1.43 (0.95 to 2.15)
 Rural Puno0.48 (0.29 to 0.82)0.61 (0.35 to 1.06)0.64 (0.37 to 1.12)0.75 (0.42 to 1.31)
 Tumbes1.89 (1.40 to 2.56)2.04 (1.49 to 2.80)1.89 (1.37 to 2.57)1.93 (1.40 to 2.66)
  • Estimates in bold are significant (p<0.05).

  • Model 1: crude model.

  • Model 2: adjusted by age, sex, education level and socioeconomic status.

  • Model 3: as model 2 plus adjustment by parental history of hypertension/diabetes.

  • Model 4: as model 3 plus adjustment by obesity status.