Table 1

The distribution of men (n = 6195) and women (n = 6309) in different peer status positions

Peer statusMenWomen
Frequency (%)Crude HR (95% CI)Adjusted* HR (95% CI)Frequency (%)Crude HR (95% CI)Adjusted* HR (95% CI)
Marginalised813 (13.1)1.47 (1.25 to 1.74)1.41 (1.19 to 1.66)607 (9.7)1.41 (1.19 to 1.67)1.37 (1.16 to 1.62)
Peripheral1205 (19.5)1.33 (1.13 to 1.56)1.28 (1.09 to 1.50)1346 (21.3)1.34 (1.15 to 1.56)1.31 (1.13 to 1.53)
Accepted2198 (35.5)1.28 (1.10 to 1.49)1.24 (1.07 to 1.44)2470 (39.2)1.14 (0.99 to 1.32)1.12 (0.97 to 1.30)
Popular1547 (25.0)1.13 (0.97 to 1.32)1.11 (0.95 to 1.29)1542 (24.4)1.05 (0.90 to 1.23)1.05 (0.90 to 1.23)
Favourite (ref)432 (7.0)1.001.00344 (5.5)1.001.00
Total6195 (100.0)6309 (100.0)
Slope0.09350.08300.09280.0851
  • Hazard ratios (HR) from Cox regression for overall inpatient care (1973–2003) by peer status (1966). Statistically significant hazard ratios (95% CI) in bold face. Slopes in bold face are significant (95% CI) according to rank correlation tests.

  • *Adjusted for parental social class.