Variables | Exposed | Decline in health | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
No | No (%) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
Women (n = 1809) | ||||||
Job insecurity and labour market chances | ||||||
No job insecurity | 1481 | 149 (10.1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Job insecurity with good labour market chances | 148 | 18 (12.2) | 1.42 (0.84 to 2.41) | 1.45 (0.85 to 2.48) | 1.44 (0.84 to 2.47) | 1.44 (0.84 to 2.47) |
Job insecurity with poor labour market chances | 180 | 33 (18.3) | 2.04 (1.34 to 3.09) | 2.11 (1.38 to 3.22) | 2.07 (1.35 to 3.18) | 2.04 (1.32 to 3.15) |
Men (n = 1918) | ||||||
Job insecurity and labour market chances | ||||||
No job insecurity | 1614 | 186 (11.5) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Job insecurity with good labour market chances | 186 | 22 (11.8) | 1.15 (0.71 to 1.85) | 1.11 (0.68 to 1.79) | 1.05 (0.64 to 1.71) | 0.87 (0.53 to 1.43) |
Job insecurity with poor labour market chances | 118 | 22 (18.6) | 1.70 (1.04 to 2.77) | 1.60 (0.97 to 2.63) | 1.52 (0.92 to 2.52) | 1.37 (0.82 to 2.28) |
Logistic regression analyses: model 1 is adjusted for age, model 2 is additionally adjusted for smoking and body mass index; model 3 is additionally adjusted for cohabitation, small children at home, socioeconomic position and type of employment; model 4 is additionally adjusted for “good” versus “very good” self-rated health at baseline.