Table 3 Effect of allostatic load on the social gradients in the extent of periodontal diseases variables in the American population 1988–1994 (NHANES III)
Education groupsPoverty : income ratio
>12 years12 years<12 years
Extent of gingival bleeding (N  = 4295)†
    Model 1 regression coefficient (95% CI)02.71*** (1.70 to 3.73)5.40*** (3.27 to 7.51)−0.86*** (−1.26 to −0.47)
    Model 2 regression coefficient (95% CI)02.13*** (1.03 to 3.24)4.58*** (2.53 to 6.63)−0.84*** (1.24 to −0.44)
Extent of loss of periodontal attachment (N  =  4295)†
    Model 1 regression coefficient (95% CI)04.36*** (2.33 to 6.40)10.58*** (7.78 to 13.38)−0.89*** (−1.46 to −0.32)
    Model 2 regression coefficient (95% CI)04.14*** (2.07 to 6.21)10.27*** (7.45 to 13.09)−0.86** (−1.42 to −0.30)
Extent of periodontal pocket depth (N  =  4295)†
    Model 1 regression coefficient (95% CI)00.95* (0.15 to 1.75)2.43*** (1.18 to 3.68)−0.37*** (−0.54 to −0.20)
    Model 2 regression coefficient (95% CI)00.81* (0.01 to 1.61)2.24*** (1.09 to 3.39)−0.36*** (−0.54 to −0.19)
  • *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

  • †Extents of gingival bleeding, loss of attachment and pocket depth, all continuous variables. Model 1 controls for education, poverty : income ratio, medical insurance, sex, ethnicity, age and smoking. Model 2 additionally controls for the aggregated allostasis variable.