Table 3

 Associations of procedural and interactional justice with heavy smoking (⩾20 cigarettes/day) among current smokers: adjusted ORs and their 95% CIs from logistic regression models with generalised estimating equations

Participants, nORs (95% CI), adjusted for:
Age (A)A+education, SEP, marital status, job contract and NA (B)B+job strain and ERI (C)
ERI, effort–reward imbalance; NA, negative affectivity; SEP, socioeconomic position.
Women4666
    Procedural justice
        High17051.001.001.00
        Intermediate14581.06 (0.81 to 1.38)1.03 (0.79 to 1.35)1.01 (0.77 to 1.33)
        Low15031.44 (1.12 to 1.82)1.34 (1.04 to 1.73)1.32 (1.02 to 1.71)
    Interactional justice
        High16171.001.001.00
        Intermediate15051.24 (0.96 to 1.60)1.20 (0.93 to 1.56)1.19 (0.92 to 1.53)
        Low15441.57 (1.22 to 2.02)1.41 (1.09 to 1.83)1.39 (1.06 to 1.81)
Men1629
    Procedural justice
        High5711.001.001.00
        Intermediate4951.22 (0.93 to 1.59)1.01 (0.76 to 1.33)1.03 (0.77 to 1.36)
        Low5631.66 (1.23 to 2.17)1.44 (1.09 to 1.90)1.48 (1.10 to 2.00)
    Interactional justice
        High5021.001.001.00
        Intermediate5950.97 (0.74 to 1.28)0.90 (0.68 to 1.20)0.92 (0.69 to 1.23)
        Low5321.59 (1.22 to 2.07)1.35 (1.03 to 1.77)1.38 (1.03 to 1.83)