Hypothesised ecological causal variables
| | | |
State social capital index | 1.09 | 0.56, 2.12 | 0.97 | 0.46, 2.03 |
State generosity | 0.84* | [0.71, 0.99 | 1.02 | 0.86, 1.22 |
Local income inequality
| | | | |
County log per cent rich | 1.98* | 1.08, 3.62 | 0.74 | 0.34, 1.63 |
Ecological confounders
| | | | |
County log unskilled wage | 0.90 | 0.50, 1.61 | 1.20 | 0.63, 2.30 |
County/state housing affordability index | 1.00 | 0.99, 1.01 | 1.00 | 0.98, 1.01 |
County crime rate | 1.04 | 0.96, 1.12 | 1.00 | 0.93, 1.07 |
County unemployment rate | 1.00 | 0.93, 1.06 | 0.91** | 0.84, 0.97 |
County log per cent black | 1.02 | 0.92, 1.14 | 1.03 | 0.91, 1.15 |
County log per cent Hispanic | 0.84* | 0.72, 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.80, 1.07 |
County log mean income | 0.76 | 0.26, 2.24 | 2.83 | 0.69, 11.64 |
County log mean years of education | 0.59** | 0.42, 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.57, 1.18 |
County psych services index | 0.93 | 0.60, 1.44 | 1.77* | 1.14, 2.74 |
County health services index | 1.80 | 0.46, 7.03 | 0.28 | 0.08, 1.04 |
Number of participants | 4817 | 4817 |
Number of counties | 855 | 855 |
Pseudo R2 | 0.10 | 0.16 |