Table 3

 Model 1: multilevel logistic regression of poor self rated health and area level variables for men and women, Tasmanian healthy communities study 1998

Models 1*Models 2†
EstimateSEt ratiop valueEstimateSEt ratiop value
*Age adjusted only. †Includes age, marital status, household income, education, occupation, indigenous status, and smoking.
Men
SE disadvantage0.0960.0234.17<0.0010.0280.0142.000.053
Neighbourhood integration−0.0160.026−0.620.532−0.0200.019−1.050.302
Neighbourhood alienation−0.0760.033−2.300.021−0.0270.027−1.000.314
Neighbourhood safety0.0380.0301.270.1940.0140.0250.560.586
Political participation0.0280.1890.150.882−0.0200.184−0.110.913
Social trust−0.0700.030−2.330.009−0.0590.023−2.570.010
Trust in public/private institutions0.0020.0210.100.9160.0010.0180.060.964
Women
SE disadvantage0.1080.00912.00<0.0010.0540.0105.40<0.001
Neighbourhood integration−0.0340.027−1.260.303−0.0280.022−1.270.210
Neighbourhood alienation0.0240.0300.800.4270.0410.0281.460.142
Neighbourhood safety−0.0480.020−2.400.014−0.0520.013−4.00<0.001
Political participation−0.5260.171−3.080.002−0.5630.127−4.43<0.001
Social trust−0.0490.025−1.960.051−0.0230.018−1.280.182
Trust in public/private institutions0.0220.0230.960.3410.0200.0171.180.251