Regression analysis for perceived general health by level of urbanity and level of education (high, secondary, no/primary) modelled as interaction effects and controlled for sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics: parameter and standard error
| Perceived general health (good/very good = 1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very strong | Strong | Moderate | Slight | Non-urban | |
| *p⩽0.05; **p⩽0.01; ***p⩽0.001. | |||||
| Higher education * % of green space (1 km) | 0.001 (0.002) | 0.005 (0.002)** | 0.004 (0.002)* | 0.000 (0.002) | 0.002 (0.004) |
| Secondary education * % of green space (1 km) | 0.005 (0.001)*** | 0.006 (0.001) *** | 0.007 (0.001)*** | 0.008 (0.002)*** | 0.006 (0.002)** |
| Primary/no education * % of green space (1 km) | 0.002 (0.002) | 0.000 (0.001) | 0.002 (0.001)* | 0.004 (0.001)*** | 0.004 (0.002)* |
| Higher education * % of green space (3 km) | 0.000 (0.003) | 0.007 (0.002) *** | 0.004 (0.003) | 0.002 (0.003) | 0.001 (0.006) |
| Secondary education * % of green space (3 km) | 0.004 (0.002)* | 0.008 (0.001) *** | 0.008 (0.002)*** | 0.008 (0.002)*** | 0.007 (0.003)** |
| Primary/no education * % of green space (3 km) | 0.001 (0.002) | 0.004 (0.002)* | 0.004 (0.002)* | 0.005 (0.002)** | 0.006 (0.003)* |