Table 2

 Effect of contextual income, measured on different scales, on mental disorders due to psychoactive substance use and neurotic disorders. Results were obtained from hierarchical geostatistical models adjusted for individual covariates* for all people aged 40–69 years in Malmö, Sweden, in 2001

Substance related disordersNeurotic disorders
Index95% CIIndex95% CI
*The models were adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education, and income. †Contextual income variables measured on different scales were introduced into separate models. ‡The deviance information criterion (DIC) can be used to compare different models estimated for a similar mental health outcome, but not to compare models for different outcomes. The lower the DIC, the better the fit of the model.
Income of 250 closest inhabitants (v fourth quartile)†
    Third quartile1.08(0.83 to 1.40)1.21(0.84 to 1.73)
    Second quartile1.81(1.40 to 2.34)1.73(1.23 to 2.45)
    First quartile2.46(1.88 to 3.24)2.03(1.44 to 2.89)
    DIC‡71343635
Income of 500 closest inhabitants (v fourth quartile)†
    Third quartile1.01(0.78 to 1.32)1.33(0.93 to 1.95)
    Second quartile1.66(1.28 to 2.18)1.94(1.37 to 2.80)
    First quartile2.10(1.61 to 2.83)2.02(1.42 to 2.94)
    DIC‡71503635
Income of 1000 closest inhabitants (v fourth quartile)†
    Third quartile1.09(0.85 to 1.42)1.15(0.81 to 1.64)
    Second quartile1.91(1.46 to 2.50)1.55(1.11 to 2.20)
    First quartile1.94(1.45 to 2.62)1.78(1.27 to 2.54)
    DIC‡71623641
Income of 1500 closest inhabitants (v fourth quartile)†
    Third quartile1.09(0.85 to 1.40)1.26(0.89 to 1.82)
    Second quartile1.42(1.08 to 1.87)1.45(1.03 to 2.08)
    First quartile1.65(1.25 to 2.23)1.59(1.12 to 2.28)
    DIC‡71793647