Associations between an improvement in self rated health since having moved and an improved satisfaction with the “perceived air quality” and the “location of the building” in different subgroups of movers
| number | Perceived air quality | Location of the building | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR3-150 | 95% CI | χ23-151 | OR3-150 | 95% CI | χ23-151 | ||||
| Total sample | 1961 | 1.58 | 1.24, 2.01 | 1.58 | 1.28, 1.96 | ||||
| Moved into single family home | 1944 | ||||||||
| yes | 268 | 3.28 | 1.46, 7.38 | 1.16 | 0.61, 2.22 | ||||
| no | 1676 | 1.44 | 1.11, 1.87 | p=0.06 | 1.69 | 1.34, 2.12 | p=0.28 | ||
| Type of moving | 1961 | ||||||||
| out of the city | 1028 | 2.27 | 1.61, 3.20 | 1.56 | 1.15, 2.12 | ||||
| within the city | 933 | 1.19 | 0.83, 1.70 | p=0.01 | 1.58 | 1.16, 2.15 | p=0.95 | ||
| Main reason to move | 1825 | ||||||||
| environmental reason3-152 | 390 | 2.28 | 1.20, 4.31 | 1.89 | 1.05, 3.39 | ||||
| other reasons | 1435 | 1.38 | 1.05, 1.83 | p=0.16 | 1.58 | 1.23, 2.02 | p=0.58 | ||
| Type of moving and main reason to move | 1825 | ||||||||
| Moved out of the city | |||||||||
| environmental reason3-152 | 230 | 4.58 | 1.76, 11.89 | 1.89 | 0.84, 4.26 | ||||
| other reason | 739 | 1.81 | 1.22, 2.69 | p=0.08 | 1.55 | 1.09, 2.22 | p=0.66 | ||
| Moved within the city | |||||||||
| environmental reason3-152 | 160 | 1.08 | 0.37, 3.13 | 3.63 | 1.20, 11.03 | ||||
| other reason | 696 | 1.18 | 0.77, 1.80 | p=0.88 | 1.48 | 1.03, 2.12 | p=0.13 | ||
↵3-150 Final logistic regression model adjusted for sex, age, household composition and income, education, type of moving and all indicators presented in table 2.
↵3-151 χ2 test for heterogeneity of estimates.
↵3-152 Including the categories “environment” (for example, noise, traffic, not enough green) and “neighbourhood” (for example, suitability for children, problems with neighbours, dirt).