PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gemma Frances Spiers
AU  - Jennifer E Liddle
AU  - Daniel Stow
AU  - Ben Searle
AU  - Ishbel Orla Whitehead
AU  - Andrew Kingston
AU  - Suzanne Moffatt
AU  - Fiona E Matthews
AU  - Barbara Hanratty
TI  - Measuring older people’s socioeconomic position: a scoping review of studies of self-rated health, health service and social care use
AID  - 10.1136/jech-2021-218265
DP  - 2022 Jun 01
TA  - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
PG  - 572--579
VI  - 76
IP  - 6
4099  - http://jech.bmj.com/content/76/6/572.short
4100  - http://jech.bmj.com/content/76/6/572.full
SO  - J Epidemiol Community Health2022 Jun 01; 76
AB  - Background The challenges of measuring socioeconomic position in older populations were first set out two decades ago. However, the question of how best to measure older people’s socioeconomic position remains pertinent as populations age and health inequalities widen.Methods A scoping review aimed to identify and appraise measures of socioeconomic position used in studies of health inequalities in older populations in high-income countries. Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, HMIC and references lists of systematic reviews were searched for observational studies of socioeconomic health inequalities in adults aged 60 years and over, published between 2000 and 2020. A narrative synthesis was conducted.Findings One-hundred and thirty-eight studies were included; 20 approaches to measuring socioeconomic position were identified. Few studies considered which pathways the chosen measures of socioeconomic position intended to capture. The validity of subjective socioeconomic position measures, and measures that assume shared income and educational capital, should be verified in older populations. Incomplete financial data risk under-representation of some older groups when missing data are socially patterned. Older study samples were largely homogeneous on measures of housing tenure, and to a lesser extent, measures of educational attainment. Measures that use only two response categories risk missing subtle differences in older people’s socioeconomic circumstances.Conclusion Poor choice of measures of socioeconomic position risk underestimating the size of health inequalities in older populations. Choice of measures should be shaped by considerations of theory, context and response categories that detect subtle, yet important, inequalities. Further evidence is required to ascertain the validity of some measures identified in this review.Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. No datasets were generated and/or analysed for this study.