RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Mortality disparities and deprivation among people with intellectual disabilities in England: 2000–2019
JF Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
JO J Epidemiol Community Health
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP 168
OP 174
DO 10.1136/jech-2021-216798
VO 76
IS 2
A1 Freya Tyrer
A1 Richard Morriss
A1 Reza Kiani
A1 Satheesh K Gangadharan
A1 Mark J Rutherford
YR 2022
UL http://jech.bmj.com/content/76/2/168.abstract
AB Background The effect of policy initiatives and deprivation on mortality disparities in people with intellectual disabilities is not clear.Methods An electronic health record observational study of linked primary care data in England from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and the Office for National Statistics deaths data from 2000 to 2019 was undertaken. All-cause and cause-specific mortality for people with intellectual disabilities were calculated by gender and deprivation status (index of multiple deprivation quintile) using direct age-standardised mortality rates (all years) and ratios (SMR; 2000–2009 vs 2010–2019).Results Among 1.0 million patients (n=33 844 with intellectual disability; n=980 586 general population without intellectual disability), differential mortality was consistently higher in people with intellectual disabilities and there was no evidence of attenuation over time. There was a dose–response relationship between all-cause mortality and lower deprivation quintile in the general population which was not observed in people with intellectual disabilities. Cause-specific SMR were consistent in both the 2000–2009 and 2010–2019 calendar periods, with a threefold increased risk of death in both males and females with intellectual disabilities (SMR ranges: 2.91–3.51). Mortality was highest from epilepsy (SMR ranges: 22.90–52.74) and aspiration pneumonia (SMR ranges: 19.31–35.44). SMRs were disproportionately high for people with intellectual disabilities living in the least deprived areas.Conclusions People with intellectual disabilities in England continue to experience significant mortality disparities and there is no evidence that the situation is improving. Deprivation indicators may not be effective for targeting vulnerable individuals.Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The data used for this study involve an extract from an established research database, the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) with linked mortality data from the Office for National Statistics. The data controller for the CPRD is the Department of Health and Social Care.